ETF · Broad Market

ESGV(ESGV)

$134.80
+0.09%
Expense Ratio
$11.1B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Closet Indexer
0%20%60%100%
18.1%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The fund's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards Technology, with over one-third of its holdings concentrated in this space. Within Technology, names like NVDA and AVGO are prominent contributors to the sector's weight, indicating a focus on semiconductor and networking equipment makers. The presence of consumer-facing giants like AAPL and AMZN also suggests an emphasis on companies that drive growth through digital transformation.

The fund's valuation posture is relatively rich, with a weighted P/E ratio of 26.9x and a weighted P/B ratio of 16.52x. This may indicate that the portfolio has already participated in some of the recent market rally or that it holds more mature businesses with high price multiples. The sector mix diverges from the broader market, which is often characterized by a stronger representation of Financial Services and Consumer Defensive stocks. A favorable macro environment for this fund would likely involve sustained growth in Technology and Communication Services sectors, while an unfavorable environment could be marked by rising interest rates or economic downturns that disproportionately impact these industries.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 20:06:12.977268+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 65/100

The fund's name implies a strict adherence to environmental, social, and governance criteria across its entire portfolio. However, the actual holdings reveal a significant concentration within mega-cap technology giants such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, and Tesla, which collectively dominate the top ten positions by weight. While these companies often possess strong ESG profiles compared to peers in their sectors, the heavy reliance on this specific cluster of large-cap stocks suggests that the fund's performance is heavily influenced by broad market tech trends rather than a diversified implementation of its stated thematic mandate. The presence of major financial institutions like JPMorgan Chase and Visa alongside consumer staples further indicates that the selection process may prioritize stability through familiar blue-chip names over a rigorous, distinct filtering mechanism for ESG factors across all sectors.

Sector analysis shows that Technology comprises 35.3% of assets, followed by Communication Services at nearly 12%, creating an allocation profile that closely mirrors the broader S&P 500 index rather than standing apart as a specialized thematic vehicle. Although Financials and Healthcare represent substantial portions of the portfolio with dozens of holdings each, the top ten concentration ratio of over 40% highlights a lack of diversification relative to a true ESG-focused strategy which might expect more balanced exposure across industries. The sector weights appear consistent with a large-cap growth tilt found in many standard market indices, raising questions about whether the fund offers genuine differentiation based on its environmental or social screening criteria, or if it functions primarily as a vehicle for accessing established technology leaders under an ESG label.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 16:19:20.615539+00

⚠️ Systemic Risk Synthesis

AI Generated

The newly disclosed risk factors from the largest holdings in this fund highlight three converging macro-level threats: stringent climate change regulations, evolving data privacy mandates, and emerging frameworks for artificial intelligence governance. Specifically, NVIDIA's filings indicate that compliance with environmental standards regarding climate change could materially impact financial conditions, while simultaneously noting that adherence to cybersecurity-driven data privacy requirements may increase operational costs. Furthermore, the potential for AI regulation to raise expenses and alter competitive positioning suggests a broader industry shift where technological innovation faces increased regulatory scrutiny. These disclosures collectively point toward an environment where rapid scaling in technology and sustainability is being met with heightened compliance burdens across multiple sectors represented within the portfolio.

The concentration of these risks among the fund's top holdings creates a significant correlation profile, as several major assets operate under similar pressures despite their diverse business models. While NVIDIA explicitly flags all three categories, other large-cap technology names such as Apple and Microsoft are inherently exposed to data privacy costs and AI regulatory landscapes given their central roles in digital infrastructure and cloud services. The fact that the single largest holding (8.2%) identifies environmental compliance as a material adverse risk underscores how deeply embedded these systemic issues have become for dominant market players. This overlap means that unfavorable policy shifts or enforcement actions targeting climate, cybersecurity, or AI could simultaneously affect multiple high-weight positions, potentially amplifying downside volatility across the entire fund rather than isolating impact to individual stocks.

Although no single company-specific risk appears so unique as to dominate the portfolio entirely, NVIDIA's substantial 8.2% weight means that any material adverse outcome related to its specific disclosures on climate or AI regulation would have a disproportionate effect on total fund performance. The explicit mention of "material adverse impact" in connection with environmental compliance for this top holding suggests that regulatory developments in these areas warrant close monitoring as they could influence the valuation trajectory of a significant portion of the ETF's assets more than smaller constituents like Visa or Costco, which do not currently highlight similar systemic exposures in their recent filings.

Synthesized from constituent 10-K risk factor disclosures. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 01:38:26.320177+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of ESGV reveals a distinct tilt toward growth-oriented industries, with Technology and Communication Services comprising nearly half of the portfolio. This heavy weighting in sectors known for high capital appreciation potential suggests an investment thesis prioritizing innovation-driven companies over stability or income generation. The top five holdings are exclusively concentrated within these two leading sectors, indicating that the fund's performance will be highly sensitive to macroeconomic shifts affecting consumer technology spending and digital media trends rather than being diversified across defensive industries like utilities or basic materials.

Concentration risk is a defining characteristic of this structure, evidenced by the significant portion of assets tied to just five major entities. The top ten holdings alone account for over 40% of total assets under management, creating a scenario where adverse events impacting any single large-cap technology firm could disproportionately influence overall portfolio volatility. While such concentration can amplify returns during bull markets characterized by tech expansion, it simultaneously exposes the fund to idiosyncratic risks specific to those dominant players that might not be present in a more broadly diversified vehicle with similar ESG mandates.

Factor tilts are evident through the underrepresentation of traditional value sectors and defensive holdings, which together make up less than 10% of the allocation. This distribution implies an underlying preference for companies with high market capitalization, strong momentum, and potentially elevated valuations rather than those offering low volatility or dividend yields. The minimal exposure to real estate and utilities further underscores a strategy that accepts higher cyclical risk in exchange for potential growth premiums, aligning closely with a modern-growth equity profile filtered through environmental, social, and governance criteria.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 23:19:57.106407+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share ESGV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of ESGV's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPTMSPTM$12B44490.9%
QUSQUS$1B39490.6%
VONEVONE$10B35789.9%
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares$2.1T0.03%35689.8%
VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF$1.5T0.03%35388.7%

91% of ESGV's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging ESGV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofESGV's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

26.9x
Weighted P/E
16.52x
Weighted P/B
1.01%
Dividend Yield
$1.7T
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 97% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000245
Well Diversified
Top 5: 29.8%Top 10: 42.3%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Growth

Sector & Cap Explorer

Technology37.6%Communication Services12.6%Financial Services11.7%Consumer Cyclical11.6%Healthcare10.1%Consumer Defensive4.3%Other4.2%Industrials3.5%Real Estate2.4%Basic Materials1.8%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
83% Weight
Market Cap
Mega
Risk Profile
Elevated

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
4%
0–3 Weak
54%
4–6 Average
25%
7–9 Strong

Based on 83% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
32%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
1.01%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
32% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside ESGV collectively pay out 32% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 63% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+29.2%
ETF 1Y Return
+35.4%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-6.2%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

ESGV is up 29.2% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +35.4%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 6.2% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 81% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of ESGV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

81% Creators
19% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)61.5%
Value Destroyers14.6%

Of ESGV's analyzed weight, 81% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 19% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 76% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Concentration Risk Monitor

ELEVATED
8.2%
Largest Holding
NVDA
21.1%
Top 3 Weight
44
Effective # of Stocks
30%
Top Stock Var. Share
Portfolio weight concentration
NVDA
AAPL
Other 45 stocks

ESGV's top holding NVDA at 8.2% is above the 8% elevated-concentration threshold. The effective number of stocks is 44 vs. the actual count of 50.

Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

36/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership10.9%
Most Crowded HoldingINTU (20.6%)
Least CrowdedGOOG (4.3%)
Coverage72% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

ESGV has a Passive Crowding Score of 36/100. On average, 10.9% of the market capitalization of ESGV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 52 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration40.2%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1NVDA
NVIDIA Corp.
Technology
8.22%
32.4x4/9
2AAPL
Apple Inc.
Technology
7.36%
37.7x8/9
3MSFT
Microsoft Corp.
Technology
5.53%
26.8x5/9
4AMZN
Amazon.com Inc.
Consumer Cyclical
4.02%
31.7x6/9
5GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
Communication Services
3.37%
29.0x6/9
6AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
Technology
2.88%
86.9x8/9
7GOOG
Alphabet Inc. Class C
Communication Services
2.73%
28.7x6/9
8META
Facebook Inc. Class A
Communication Services
2.52%
23.0x5/9
9TSLA
Tesla Inc.
Consumer Cyclical
2.11%
399.8x5/9
10JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Financial Services
1.50%
14.3x3/9
11LLY
Eli Lilly & Co.
Healthcare
1.48%
39.2x7/9
12V
Visa Inc. Class A
Financial Services
1.02%
28.5x6/9
13COST
Costco Wholesale Corp.
Consumer Defensive
0.89%
49.8x6/9
14NFLX
Netflix Inc.
Communication Services
0.82%
27.7x6/9
15MA
Mastercard Inc. Class A
Financial Services
0.81%
28.6x8/9
The bottom 485 stocks in ESGV account for only 54.7% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 500.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how ESGV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA8.22%5,253,530$916.2M
2AAPL7.36%3,233,954$820.7M
3MSFT5.53%1,664,790$616.3M
4AMZN4.02%2,153,307$448.5M
5GOOGL3.37%1,304,888$375.2M
6AVGO2.88%1,036,698$320.9M
7GOOG2.73%1,062,393$304.8M
8META2.52%490,122$280.4M
9TSLA2.11%633,380$235.5M
10JPM1.50%570,004$167.7M
11LLY1.48%179,827$165.4M
12V1.02%377,847$114.2M
13COST0.89%99,628$99.3M
14NFLX0.82%951,330$91.5M
15MA0.81%180,596$90.2M

2026-05-23

15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA8.22%5,253,530$916.2M
2AAPL7.36%3,233,954$820.7M
3MSFT5.53%1,664,790$616.3M
4AMZN4.02%2,153,307$448.5M
5GOOGL3.37%1,304,888$375.2M
6AVGO2.88%1,036,698$320.9M
7GOOG2.73%1,062,393$304.8M
8META2.52%490,122$280.4M
9TSLA2.11%633,380$235.5M
10JPM1.50%570,004$167.7M
11LLY1.48%179,827$165.4M
12V1.02%377,847$114.2M
13COST0.89%99,628$99.3M
14NFLX0.82%951,330$91.5M
15MA0.81%180,596$90.2M

2026-05-22

15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA8.22%5,253,530$916.2M
2AAPL7.36%3,233,954$820.7M
3MSFT5.53%1,664,790$616.3M
4AMZN4.02%2,153,307$448.5M
5GOOGL3.37%1,304,888$375.2M
6AVGO2.88%1,036,698$320.9M
7GOOG2.73%1,062,393$304.8M
8META2.52%490,122$280.4M
9TSLA2.11%633,380$235.5M
10JPM1.50%570,004$167.7M
11LLY1.48%179,827$165.4M
12V1.02%377,847$114.2M
13COST0.89%99,628$99.3M
14NFLX0.82%951,330$91.5M
15MA0.81%180,596$90.2M

2026-05-21

15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA8.22%5,253,530$916.2M
2AAPL7.36%3,233,954$820.7M
3MSFT5.53%1,664,790$616.3M
4AMZN4.02%2,153,307$448.5M
5GOOGL3.37%1,304,888$375.2M
6AVGO2.88%1,036,698$320.9M
7GOOG2.73%1,062,393$304.8M
8META2.52%490,122$280.4M
9TSLA2.11%633,380$235.5M
10JPM1.50%570,004$167.7M
11LLY1.48%179,827$165.4M
12V1.02%377,847$114.2M
13COST0.89%99,628$99.3M
14NFLX0.82%951,330$91.5M
15MA0.81%180,596$90.2M

2026-05-20

15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA8.22%5,253,530$916.2M
2AAPL7.36%3,233,954$820.7M
3MSFT5.53%1,664,790$616.3M
4AMZN4.02%2,153,307$448.5M
5GOOGL3.37%1,304,888$375.2M
6AVGO2.88%1,036,698$320.9M
7GOOG2.73%1,062,393$304.8M
8META2.52%490,122$280.4M
9TSLA2.11%633,380$235.5M
10JPM1.50%570,004$167.7M
11LLY1.48%179,827$165.4M
12V1.02%377,847$114.2M
13COST0.89%99,628$99.3M
14NFLX0.82%951,330$91.5M
15MA0.81%180,596$90.2M

2026-05-19

15 holdings · 45.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1NVDA8.22%5,253,530$916.2M
2AAPL7.36%3,233,954$820.7M
3MSFT5.53%1,664,790$616.3M
4AMZN4.02%2,153,307$448.5M
5GOOGL3.37%1,304,888$375.2M
6AVGO2.88%1,036,698$320.9M
7GOOG2.73%1,062,393$304.8M
8META2.52%490,122$280.4M
9TSLA2.11%633,380$235.5M
10JPM1.50%570,004$167.7M
11LLY1.48%179,827$165.4M
12V1.02%377,847$114.2M
13COST0.89%99,628$99.3M
14NFLX0.82%951,330$91.5M
15MA0.81%180,596$90.2M

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

18.3%
Annual Volatility
1.30
Sharpe (1Y)
0.92
Sharpe (3Y)
-20.4%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-28.8%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove ESGV Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.09%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

+0.092%
+0.041%
+0.034%

Top Detractors

-0.032%
-0.041%
-0.157%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

ESGV is currently trading at $128.79, a price point that requires contextualization against its moving average envelope to assess relative value and potential mean-reversion dynamics. Without specific data regarding the location of the short-term or long-term simple moving averages surrounding this current level, it remains unclear whether the asset is exhibiting an overextended condition typical of a reversal setup or if it maintains momentum within a trending channel. The distance between the $128.79 price and the implied central tendency defined by these averages would dictate the statistical probability of a pullback toward fair value versus continued directional movement. In scenarios where the current price sits significantly outside the bounds of its standard deviation bands, historical patterns often suggest a contraction in volatility as prices gravitate back toward the mean. Conversely, if $128.79 aligns closely with or exceeds recent moving average peaks, it may indicate sustained bullish pressure rather than an imminent correction. The absence of additional technical metrics such as volume profiles or oscillator readings limits the ability to confirm whether this specific price level represents a statistical anomaly or a supported equilibrium point within the broader market structure. Ultimately, the positioning relative to these dynamic averages serves only as a snapshot of current valuation stress without predicting future trajectories. Market participants must evaluate how $128.79 interacts with historical support and resistance zones derived from moving average crossovers before forming views on potential reversals. The data provided offers a single coordinate in time but lacks the comparative

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How ESGV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2456 snapshots
Technology37.6%
Communication Services12.6%
Financial Services11.7%
Consumer Cyclical11.6%
Healthcare10.1%
Consumer Defensive4.3%
Other4.2%
Industrials3.5%
Real Estate2.4%
Basic Materials1.8%
Utilities0.2%
Change since 2026-03-30
Technology
-0.7%
Consumer Defensive
+0.6%
Financial Services
-0.5%
Industrials
+0.5%
Basic Materials
+0.3%
Real Estate
+0.2%
2026-03-302026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.