EWA(EWA)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards "Other" industries, which likely encompasses a mix of financials and industrials given the presence of Australian banks and mining companies among its top holdings. The fund's weighted P/E ratio of 20.5x suggests it has a moderate valuation posture relative to global equity markets, while its weighted P/B ratio of 3.40x indicates it is trading at a premium.
The portfolio's top holdings are dominated by the Australian banking sector, with BHP and RIO also contributing significantly to its overall exposure. The concentration risk is relatively high due to the presence of these large-cap stocks, which could be influenced by regional economic trends or commodity price fluctuations. In terms of sector mix, the fund has a more pronounced tilt towards financials compared to the broader market, which may pose some risks in an environment characterized by rising interest rates or banking sector headwinds.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 09:42:36.810133+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 45/100The investment theme implied by the ticker EWA is Exposure to Australian equities, yet the portfolio's composition reveals a heavy reliance on large-cap financial and resources giants that dominate the broader market rather than offering distinct thematic exposure. The top holdings include major banks such as Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Westpac, ANZ, and NAB, alongside mining titans BHP and Rio Tinto. This concentration suggests the fund tracks the general performance of the ASX 200 or similar broad indices more closely than a dedicated sector-specific strategy would typically dictate. The significant weightings in mega-cap stocks indicate that returns are likely driven by overall market movements rather than specific thematic factors, potentially blurring the line between an active thematic vehicle and a passive broad-market proxy.
Sector coherence is further complicated by high concentration risk within these dominant industries, as evidenced by the top-ten holdings accounting for nearly two-thirds of assets under management. While financials and materials are indeed major sectors in Australia, their overwhelming presence limits diversification across other parts of the Australian economy such as healthcare, technology, or consumer discretionary. The fund appears to lack differentiation from a standard broad-market index given its heavy overlap with the largest constituents of those indices. Consequently, investors seeking exposure specifically tailored to non-financial or non-resource themes may find this allocation less aligned with their intended objectives, while those accepting general Australian market beta will see minimal deviation from benchmark performance.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 11:39:18.174403+00
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Caution: 30% of fund weight scores below 4 — indicating weak profitability or deteriorating fundamentals.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 64% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside EWA collectively pay out 81% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is stretched — a prolonged earnings slump could force constituent companies to cut dividends. Based on 18% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryEWA is up 10.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +5.0%. The remaining +5.6% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 61% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of EWA's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of EWA's analyzed weight, 77% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 23% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 33% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Concentration Risk Monitor
HIGHBHP.AX at 14.8% contributes an estimated 39% of portfolio variance.EWA holds 10 stocks but behaves like an 18-stock portfolio due to weight concentration in the top holdings.
Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
LOWHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
EWA has a low Passive Crowding Score of 0/100. On average, 0.1% of the market capitalization of EWA's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 1 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHP.AX | BHP Group Ltd | 14.81% | 17.3x | 4/9 |
| 2 | CBA.AX | Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 13.52% | 27.2x | 2/9 |
| 3 | WBC.AX | Westpac Banking Corp | 5.91% | 19.6x | 2/9 |
| 4 | NAB.AX | National Australia Bank Ltd | 5.70% | 18.7x | 2/9 |
| 5 | ANZ.AX | ANZ Group Holdings Ltd | 5.23% | 18.3x | 4/9 |
| 6 | WES.AX | Wesfarmers Ltd | 5.04% | 27.0x | 5/9 |
| 7 | MQG.AX | Macquarie Group Ltd | 4.45% | 20.5x | 3/9 |
| 8 | RIO.AX | Rio Tinto Ltd | 3.15% | 18.2x | 4/9 |
| 9 | GMG.AX | Goodman Group | 3.05% | 29.9x | 4/9 |
| 10 | CSL.AX | CSL Ltd | 2.73% | 15.7x | 6/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how EWA’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-07-19
10 holdings · 63.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHP.AX | 14.81% | — | — |
| 2 | CBA.AX | 13.52% | — | — |
| 3 | WBC.AX | 5.91% | — | — |
| 4 | NAB.AX | 5.70% | — | — |
| 5 | ANZ.AX | 5.23% | — | — |
| 6 | WES.AX | 5.04% | — | — |
| 7 | MQG.AX | 4.45% | — | — |
| 8 | RIO.AX | 3.15% | — | — |
| 9 | GMG.AX | 3.05% | — | — |
| 10 | CSL.AX | 2.73% | — | — |
2026-07-18
10 holdings · 63.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHP.AX | 14.81% | — | — |
| 2 | CBA.AX | 13.52% | — | — |
| 3 | WBC.AX | 5.91% | — | — |
| 4 | NAB.AX | 5.70% | — | — |
| 5 | ANZ.AX | 5.23% | — | — |
| 6 | WES.AX | 5.04% | — | — |
| 7 | MQG.AX | 4.45% | — | — |
| 8 | RIO.AX | 3.15% | — | — |
| 9 | GMG.AX | 3.05% | — | — |
| 10 | CSL.AX | 2.73% | — | — |
2026-07-17
10 holdings · 63.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHP.AX | 14.81% | — | — |
| 2 | CBA.AX | 13.52% | — | — |
| 3 | WBC.AX | 5.91% | — | — |
| 4 | NAB.AX | 5.70% | — | — |
| 5 | ANZ.AX | 5.23% | — | — |
| 6 | WES.AX | 5.04% | — | — |
| 7 | MQG.AX | 4.45% | — | — |
| 8 | RIO.AX | 3.15% | — | — |
| 9 | GMG.AX | 3.05% | — | — |
| 10 | CSL.AX | 2.73% | — | — |
2026-07-16
10 holdings · 63.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHP.AX | 14.81% | — | — |
| 2 | CBA.AX | 13.52% | — | — |
| 3 | WBC.AX | 5.91% | — | — |
| 4 | NAB.AX | 5.70% | — | — |
| 5 | ANZ.AX | 5.23% | — | — |
| 6 | WES.AX | 5.04% | — | — |
| 7 | MQG.AX | 4.45% | — | — |
| 8 | RIO.AX | 3.15% | — | — |
| 9 | GMG.AX | 3.05% | — | — |
| 10 | CSL.AX | 2.73% | — | — |
2026-07-15
10 holdings · 63.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHP.AX | 14.81% | — | — |
| 2 | CBA.AX | 13.52% | — | — |
| 3 | WBC.AX | 5.91% | — | — |
| 4 | NAB.AX | 5.70% | — | — |
| 5 | ANZ.AX | 5.23% | — | — |
| 6 | WES.AX | 5.04% | — | — |
| 7 | MQG.AX | 4.45% | — | — |
| 8 | RIO.AX | 3.15% | — | — |
| 9 | GMG.AX | 3.05% | — | — |
| 10 | CSL.AX | 2.73% | — | — |
2026-07-14
10 holdings · 63.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BHP.AX | 14.81% | — | — |
| 2 | CBA.AX | 13.52% | — | — |
| 3 | WBC.AX | 5.91% | — | — |
| 4 | NAB.AX | 5.70% | — | — |
| 5 | ANZ.AX | 5.23% | — | — |
| 6 | WES.AX | 5.04% | — | — |
| 7 | MQG.AX | 4.45% | — | — |
| 8 | RIO.AX | 3.15% | — | — |
| 9 | GMG.AX | 3.05% | — | — |
| 10 | CSL.AX | 2.73% | — | — |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price of $28.53 for EWA sits at a critical juncture where technical indicators often reflect shifting institutional sentiment, though the provided data lacks specific moving average crossovers or volume metrics to confirm directional bias with certainty. In the absence of explicit trend confirmation from short-term versus long-term averages, larger market participants may be in a state of consolidation rather than aggressive accumulation or distribution. Without visible spikes in trading volume that typically accompany significant institutional positioning changes, it remains unclear whether major players are actively building positions or simply holding steady amidst market noise. Price action at this level suggests that the asset is testing key support and resistance zones without clear momentum indicators to dictate an immediate breakout direction. If institutions were aggressively entering positions, one might expect to see sustained upward pressure accompanied by expanding volume, yet current data does not explicitly confirm such dynamics. Conversely, a lack of significant selling pressure could indicate defensive holding rather than panic exits. The interplay between the current price and historical volatility patterns will likely reveal more about institutional intent once additional technical context becomes available, allowing observers to better gauge whether larger entities view this valuation as an opportunity or a risk zone requiring caution.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How EWA’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.