ETF · Broad Market

EWZ(EWZ)

$34.50
-0.14%
Expense Ratio
$9.7B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
78.8%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is skewed towards other sectors, making up nearly half of its holdings, with financial services accounting for only about 9% of the total. This suggests that the fund has a broad exposure to various industries in Brazil. At a market-cap level, the top holdings are primarily large and mid-cap companies, with no small-cap representation.

The dominance of Vale (VALE3.SA) at over 11% of the portfolio's weight is notable, indicating significant concentration risk. The sector mix is also heavily influenced by the energy and materials sectors, which are prominent in Brazil's economy. A favorable macro environment for this portfolio would likely be one with strong commodity prices and economic growth in Brazil, while a downturn in these areas could lead to underperformance.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-06-28 08:46:25.119624+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 45/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker EWZ is exposure to Brazil, yet the portfolio composition reveals a heavy reliance on specific mega-cap equities that may dilute thematic breadth. While financial services and energy giants dominate the top holdings, representing significant portions of the fund's assets, several major constituents lack explicit sector classifications in the provided data, suggesting they span diverse industries beyond a single coherent narrative. This concentration within a handful of massive companies indicates that the fund's performance is disproportionately driven by these specific entities rather than offering broad exposure to the Brazilian economy as a whole. The presence of such dominant names suggests the strategy may prioritize stability through established market leaders over maintaining a diversified thematic focus across smaller or mid-cap sectors typically associated with emerging market growth stories.

Sector coherence appears limited given that financial services alone account for less than nine percent of the portfolio despite holding multiple top-tier positions, while other major industrial and energy players remain unclassified in the breakdown. This structure creates a concentration risk where the fund's returns are tightly coupled to the performance of a few large issuers rather than reflecting the wider economic landscape implied by its geographic mandate. Consequently, the portfolio may not be sufficiently differentiated from broad Brazilian market indices that also capture these heavyweight stocks, potentially limiting the investor's ability to isolate specific thematic exposures or mitigate idiosyncratic risks associated with individual companies. The high top-ten concentration further underscores a strategy centered on liquidity and size rather than sectoral diversification within the target geography.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 08:32:19.21189+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation for EWZ reveals a distinct divergence between its reported industry breakdown and the actual composition of its largest holdings. While Financial Services accounts for only 8.7% of the portfolio, driven primarily by Banco Bradesco (NU) and Itaú Unibanco (ITUB4), this figure masks the fund's overwhelming exposure to Brazil's extractive industries. The top five positions are dominated by Vale S.A., Petrobras, and its dual-listed counterpart, indicating that energy and materials sectors likely constitute the vast majority of economic weight despite not being explicitly detailed in the provided sector line items. This structural characteristic suggests an investment thesis heavily reliant on commodity cycles rather than broad financial or consumer trends.

The concentration risk profile is exceptionally high, with the top ten holdings representing 58.4% of total assets under management. Such a concentrated portfolio implies significant vulnerability to idiosyncratic events affecting specific Brazilian corporates or systemic shocks within the resource sector. The heavy weighting in state-owned and major private energy firms further accentuates sensitivity to domestic fiscal policies, currency fluctuations, and global demand for oil and iron ore. Consequently, the fund exhibits a strong tilt toward value factors often found in cyclical industries but lacks diversification across geographies or sectors that typically mitigates country-specific volatility.

Ultimately, this allocation pattern positions EWZ as a vehicle specifically targeting exposure to Brazil's resource-rich economy rather than providing broad market coverage. The limited presence of financial services relative to the dominance of industrial giants highlights a strategic focus on capital-intensive production sectors. Investors examining this profile must weigh the potential for outsized returns during commodity supercycles against the amplified risks associated with single-country and single-sector dependencies inherent in such a concentrated structure.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 10:20:04.961483+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share EWZ's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 71% of EWZ's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VWOVanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund$149B318.7%
VXUSVXUS$624B318.7%
VYMIVYMI$19B318.7%
VEUVEU$86B215.0%
VSGXVSGX$6B211.8%

19% of EWZ's portfolio by weight is also held by VWO, which commands 15× more assets under management. When VWO receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging EWZ's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 83% ofEWZ's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

15.7x
Weighted P/E
2.52x
Weighted P/B
$191B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 68% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000413
Well Diversified
Top 5: 41.5%Top 10: 57.9%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other84.9%Financial Services15.1%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
39% Weight
Market Cap
Mega
Risk Profile
Elevated

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
0%
0–3 Weak
30%
4–6 Average
10%
7–9 Strong

Based on 39% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
105%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
2.34%
TTM Yield
At Risk
Dividend Durability
105% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside EWZ collectively pay out 105% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. Warning: constituent companies are paying out nearly all cash flow. A wave of dividend cuts may be imminent if earnings decline. Based on 24% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+24.0%
ETF 1Y Return
+19.2%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+4.9%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

EWZ is up 24.0% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +19.2%. The remaining +4.9% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 39% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of EWZ's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

63% Creators
37% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)19.2%
Value Destroyers11.3%

Of EWZ's analyzed weight, 63% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 37% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 30% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Concentration Risk Monitor

ELEVATED
11.3%
Largest Holding
VALE3.SA
28.2%
Top 3 Weight
24
Effective # of Stocks
31%
Top Stock Var. Share
Portfolio weight concentration
VALE3.SA
NU
ITUB4
PETR4
PETR3.SA
Other 5 stocks

EWZ's top holding VALE3.SA at 11.3% is above the 8% elevated-concentration threshold. The effective number of stocks is 24 vs. the actual count of 10.

Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

LOW

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

2/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership0.5%
Most Crowded HoldingNU (1.6%)
Least CrowdedPETR3.SA (0.1%)
Coverage39% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

EWZ has a low Passive Crowding Score of 2/100. On average, 0.5% of the market capitalization of EWZ's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 1 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration57.9%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1VALE3.SA
Vale SA
11.30%
27.8x5/9
2NU
Nu Holdings Ltd Ordinary Shares Class A
Financial Services
8.74%
20.3x4/9
3ITUB4
Itau Unibanco Holding SA Participating Preferred
8.14%
4PETR4
Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras Participating Preferred
6.86%
5PETR3.SA
Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras
6.50%
6.8x7/9
6BBDC4
Bank Bradesco SA Participating Preferred
3.67%
7B3SA3.SA
B3 SA - Brasil Bolsa Balcao
3.58%
20.6x4/9
8ABEV3.SA
Ambev SA
3.20%
14.9x7/9
9WEGE3.SA
Weg SA
3.05%
32.1x6/9
10SBSP3.SA
Companhia De Saneamento Basico Do Estado De Sao Paulo
2.85%
12.4x4/9

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how EWZ’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-01

10 holdings · 57.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VALE3.SA11.30%
2NU8.74%
3ITUB48.14%
4PETR46.86%
5PETR3.SA6.50%
6BBDC43.67%
7B3SA3.SA3.58%
8ABEV3.SA3.20%
9WEGE3.SA3.05%
10SBSP3.SA2.85%

2026-06-30

10 holdings · 57.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VALE3.SA11.30%
2NU8.74%
3ITUB48.14%
4PETR46.86%
5PETR3.SA6.50%
6BBDC43.67%
7B3SA3.SA3.58%
8ABEV3.SA3.20%
9WEGE3.SA3.05%
10SBSP3.SA2.85%

2026-06-29

10 holdings · 57.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VALE3.SA11.30%
2NU8.74%
3ITUB48.14%
4PETR46.86%
5PETR3.SA6.50%
6BBDC43.67%
7B3SA3.SA3.58%
8ABEV3.SA3.20%
9WEGE3.SA3.05%
10SBSP3.SA2.85%

2026-06-28

10 holdings · 57.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VALE3.SA11.30%
2NU8.74%
3ITUB48.14%
4PETR46.86%
5PETR3.SA6.50%
6BBDC43.67%
7B3SA3.SA3.58%
8ABEV3.SA3.20%
9WEGE3.SA3.05%
10SBSP3.SA2.85%

2026-06-27

10 holdings · 57.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VALE3.SA11.30%
2NU8.74%
3ITUB48.14%
4PETR46.86%
5PETR3.SA6.50%
6BBDC43.67%
7B3SA3.SA3.58%
8ABEV3.SA3.20%
9WEGE3.SA3.05%
10SBSP3.SA2.85%

2026-06-26

10 holdings · 57.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VALE3.SA11.30%
2NU8.74%
3ITUB48.14%
4PETR46.86%
5PETR3.SA6.50%
6BBDC43.67%
7B3SA3.SA3.58%
8ABEV3.SA3.20%
9WEGE3.SA3.05%
10SBSP3.SA2.85%

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

27.5%
Annual Volatility
0.88
Sharpe (1Y)
0.22
Sharpe (3Y)
-31.4%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-32.2%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove EWZ Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:-0.14%(2026-06-30)

Top Contributors

+0.153%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current price level of $35.89 for EWZ sits within a context where technical structures often reflect the positioning of larger market participants rather than isolated retail sentiment. While specific moving average crossover data and volume trends are not explicitly provided in the input, the absence of such indicators suggests that immediate institutional momentum signals may be muted or currently neutral at this snapshot in time. In many equity markets, significant shifts in large-cap behavior typically manifest as sustained deviations from key averages accompanied by divergent volume profiles; without these specific confirmations visible here, the price action appears to lack a definitive directional thrust driven by heavy-handed accumulation or distribution patterns. Institutional players frequently utilize support and resistance zones established by historical trading ranges to gauge market sentiment, yet the current data point offers only a static reference rather than a dynamic trend analysis. The solitary figure of $35.89 does not inherently reveal whether sophisticated algorithms are building long positions in anticipation of an upward move or reducing exposure ahead of potential volatility. Observers must therefore interpret this price level as merely one coordinate within a broader chart pattern that requires additional technical confirmation to infer the strategic intent of major holders. Any conclusion regarding institutional alignment remains speculative without further data on how volume interacts with price changes over successive timeframes, leaving the true positioning of large investors ambiguous at this specific moment.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

2.34%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How EWZ’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-0176 snapshots
Other84.9%
Financial Services15.1%
Change since 2026-03-30
Financial Services
-1.0%
Other
+1.0%
2026-03-302026-07-01

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-30.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.