ETF · Large Value

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF(IWD)

$239.32
+0.78%
Expense Ratio
$69.8B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Moderate
0%20%60%100%
51.6%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF maintains a substantial asset base of nearly $70 billion, reflecting significant investor interest in value-oriented large-cap equities. Its portfolio construction demonstrates a distinct tilt toward financial services and healthcare, which together account for over one-quarter of the total allocation, while industrials and technology sectors round out the top four exposures at roughly 19% combined. This sector distribution suggests a strategy that prioritizes established companies with stable earnings potential rather than high-growth tech firms alone, although technology remains a notable component given its nearly double-digit weighting compared to many growth indices.

Concentration analysis reveals a moderate level of risk associated with the top ten holdings, which collectively represent approximately 19% of assets under management. Notably, Berkshire Hathaway leads this concentration group at just under three percent, followed closely by major financial and energy names like JPMorgan Chase, ExxonMobil, and Chevron. The inclusion of diverse sectors within these top positions—from communication services to consumer defensives—indicates a broad-based approach rather than an aggressive bet on a single industry vertical. However, the presence of multiple heavyweight players in both finance and energy implies that macroeconomic shifts affecting these specific industries could have a disproportionately large impact on the fund's overall performance relative to more diversified peers.

Quantitatively, the fund's composition aligns with a value strategy by overweighting traditional economic drivers such as banking and industrial manufacturing while maintaining exposure to defensive healthcare staples. The geographic profile is implicitly global given the international nature of some holdings like Alphabet, though the primary driver remains domestic large-cap value stocks. This structure offers investors access to a curated slice of the Russell 1000 universe that emphasizes undervalued metrics rather than momentum or growth factors. Ultimately, the ETF serves as a vehicle for capturing returns from specific segments of the market defined by low price-to-book ratios and strong cash flow generation, allowing participants to express a view on value without directly purchasing individual securities.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 10:19:52.645512+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100

The investment theme implied by the name "Russell 1000 Value" is executed with high fidelity, as the portfolio composition strictly adheres to a broad-based value factor strategy rather than pursuing a specific industry or innovation narrative. The top holdings reflect this approach through significant exposure to established leaders across diverse sectors such as financial services, healthcare, and industrials, which are traditional staples of a value-oriented index. While mega-cap technology and communication service firms like Alphabet and Amazon appear in the top ten, their inclusion aligns with the objective of capturing large-value stocks within the broader Russell 1000 universe rather than indicating a tilt toward growth or specific thematic trends. The presence of these well-known entities alongside utilities and real estate suggests the fund is maintaining its mandate to track the value segment of the total market without deviating into niche strategies that would dilute this core definition.

Sector coherence remains robust, with financial services holding the largest weight at 14.1%, followed by healthcare and industrials, all representing historically defensive or cyclical value plays typical of such indices. The distribution across twelve distinct sectors demonstrates a lack of concentration risk in any single industry, ensuring that performance is driven by the aggregate behavior of large-cap value stocks rather than idiosyncratic moves within one field. With a top-ten concentration of 19.3%, the fund avoids over-reliance on individual issuers while still benefiting from liquidity and stability provided by its largest constituents. This structure effectively differentiates the vehicle from broad market indices only through its specific valuation methodology, as evidenced by the sector weights that favor mature industries over speculative growth segments, thereby maintaining a clear distinction based on value characteristics rather than total market exposure.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 09:16:01.294501+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF exhibits a sector profile heavily weighted toward Financial Services, which accounts for nearly fourteen percent of the portfolio and serves as the largest single allocation. This significant exposure aligns with the traditional value investing thesis that often favors sectors characterized by stable cash flows and tangible assets, though it also introduces notable sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations and economic cycles affecting lending institutions. Healthcare follows at ten point one percent, providing a substantial defensive layer within the portfolio structure, while Industrials and Technology each hold just under ten percent, indicating a balanced but not aggressive tilt toward growth-oriented sectors relative to their historical weightings in broad value indices.

Concentration risk is mitigated by the fund's diversification across twelve distinct sectors, yet the top five holdings collectively represent nearly twenty percent of total assets, with Berkshire Hathaway alone comprising almost three percent despite its unique classification challenges. The presence of major players like JPMorgan Chase and Exxon Mobil in the upper echelon reinforces the financial and energy dominance typical of value strategies, while the inclusion of large-cap tech names such as Alphabet suggests an attempt to capture undervalued growth elements often overlooked by pure-growth screens. Utilities and Real Estate remain minor components at four point four percent and three point three percent respectively, signaling that the fund does not prioritize income-heavy or land-intensive sectors over those with higher earnings yield potential.

Factor tilts evident in this allocation suggest a strategy prioritizing low price-to-book ratios and high dividend yields found predominantly in financials and energy stocks, rather than seeking exposure to small-cap value or momentum factors. The relatively lower weightings in Consumer Cyclical goods and Basic Materials further distinguish the portfolio from more cyclical industrial playbooks, favoring established businesses with pricing power over emerging commodity-dependent firms. Ultimately, this sector distribution reflects a deliberate focus on large-cap equities that have historically traded at discounts to intrinsic value, balancing stability through financial services exposure with moderate diversification into defensive healthcare and industrials without relying heavily on volatile real estate or material extraction sectors.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 14:45:52.812144+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share IWD's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of IWD's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF$80B79995.7%
SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF$37B78694.8%
SCHXSCHX$61B58191.2%
RSPRSP$83B42688.9%
ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF$28B41987.1%

96% of IWD's portfolio by weight is also held by ITOT. When ITOT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging IWD's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofIWD's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

21.7x
Weighted P/E
4.94x
Weighted P/B
1.67%
Dividend Yield
$398B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 80% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400069
Well Diversified
Top 5: 12.0%Top 10: 19.0%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other20.1%Financial Services14.0%Healthcare10.0%Industrials9.6%Technology9.1%Communication Services7.6%Energy7.0%Consumer Defensive7.0%Consumer Cyclical5.9%Utilities4.4%Real Estate3.2%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
69% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
7%
0–3 Weak
45%
4–6 Average
17%
7–9 Strong

Based on 69% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
72%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
1.21%
TTM Yield
Stretched
Dividend Durability
72% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside IWD collectively pay out 72% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 53% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+27.7%
ETF 1Y Return
+17.2%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+10.5%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

IWD is up 27.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +17.2%. The remaining +10.5% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 68% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of IWD's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

60% Creators
40% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)35.9%
Value Destroyers24.4%

Of IWD's analyzed weight, 60% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 40% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 60% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

39/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership11.7%
Most Crowded HoldingVLO (19.4%)
Least CrowdedGOOG (4.3%)
Coverage55% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

IWD has a Passive Crowding Score of 39/100. On average, 11.7% of the market capitalization of IWD's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 9 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration19.3%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1BRKB
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.
2.91%
2JPM
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
Financial Services
2.63%
14.3x3/9
3XOM
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION
Energy
2.36%
24.5x5/9
4GOOGL
ALPHABET INC.
Communication Services
1.95%
29.0x6/9
5JNJ
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Healthcare
1.94%
26.1x4/9
6AMZN
AMAZON.COM, INC.
Consumer Cyclical
1.81%
31.7x6/9
7WMT
WALMART INC.
Consumer Defensive
1.60%
40.8x7/9
8GOOG
ALPHABET INC.
Communication Services
1.59%
28.7x6/9
9CVX
CHEVRON CORPORATION
Energy
1.28%
31.7x6/9
10MU
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Technology
1.24%
45.9x7/9
11PG
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY
Consumer Defensive
1.12%
21.0x6/9
12CSCO
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
Technology
1.02%
40.1x8/9
13MRK
MERCK & CO., INC.
Healthcare
0.98%
33.4x4/9
14BAC
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION
Financial Services
0.97%
12.8x5/9
15CAT
CATERPILLAR INC.
Industrials
0.95%
43.7x6/9
The bottom 853 stocks in IWD account for only 75.7% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 868.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how IWD’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

15 holdings · 24.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1BRKB2.91%4,235,666$2.0B
2JPM2.63%6,238,632$1.8B
3XOM2.36%9,702,185$1.6B
4GOOGL1.95%4,738,196$1.4B
5JNJ1.94%5,526,423$1.4B
6AMZN1.81%6,056,436$1.3B
7WMT1.60%8,993,050$1.1B
8GOOG1.59%3,858,035$1.1B
9CVX1.28%4,302,429$890.2M
10MU1.24%2,565,926$866.9M
11PG1.12%5,394,124$779.1M
12CSCO1.02%9,140,516$709.2M
13MRK0.98%5,707,253$686.5M
14BAC0.97%13,883,945$676.8M
15CAT0.95%932,467$660.6M

2026-05-23

15 holdings · 24.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1BRKB2.91%4,235,666$2.0B
2JPM2.63%6,238,632$1.8B
3XOM2.36%9,702,185$1.6B
4GOOGL1.95%4,738,196$1.4B
5JNJ1.94%5,526,423$1.4B
6AMZN1.81%6,056,436$1.3B
7WMT1.60%8,993,050$1.1B
8GOOG1.59%3,858,035$1.1B
9CVX1.28%4,302,429$890.2M
10MU1.24%2,565,926$866.9M
11PG1.12%5,394,124$779.1M
12CSCO1.02%9,140,516$709.2M
13MRK0.98%5,707,253$686.5M
14BAC0.97%13,883,945$676.8M
15CAT0.95%932,467$660.6M

2026-05-22

15 holdings · 24.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1BRKB3.09%4,295,181$2.2B
2JPM2.92%6,326,366$2.0B
3GOOGL2.15%4,804,774$1.5B
4AMZN2.03%6,141,527$1.4B
5GOOG1.76%3,912,248$1.2B
6XOM1.70%9,838,666$1.2B
7JNJ1.66%5,604,063$1.2B
8WMT1.46%9,119,401$1.0B
9BAC1.12%14,254,889$784.0M
10PG1.12%5,469,933$783.9M
11MU1.06%2,601,977$742.6M
12CSCO1.02%9,268,948$714.0M
13UNH1.00%2,119,121$699.5M
14WFC0.98%7,320,588$682.3M
15CVX0.95%4,362,955$665.0M

2026-05-21

15 holdings · 24.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1BRKB3.09%4,295,181$2.2B
2JPM2.92%6,326,366$2.0B
3GOOGL2.15%4,804,774$1.5B
4AMZN2.03%6,141,527$1.4B
5GOOG1.76%3,912,248$1.2B
6XOM1.70%9,838,666$1.2B
7JNJ1.66%5,604,063$1.2B
8WMT1.46%9,119,401$1.0B
9BAC1.12%14,254,889$784.0M
10PG1.12%5,469,933$783.9M
11MU1.06%2,601,977$742.6M
12CSCO1.02%9,268,948$714.0M
13UNH1.00%2,119,121$699.5M
14WFC0.98%7,320,588$682.3M
15CVX0.95%4,362,955$665.0M

2026-05-20

15 holdings · 24.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1BRKB3.09%4,295,181$2.2B
2JPM2.92%6,326,366$2.0B
3GOOGL2.15%4,804,774$1.5B
4AMZN2.03%6,141,527$1.4B
5GOOG1.76%3,912,248$1.2B
6XOM1.70%9,838,666$1.2B
7JNJ1.66%5,604,063$1.2B
8WMT1.46%9,119,401$1.0B
9BAC1.12%14,254,889$784.0M
10PG1.12%5,469,933$783.9M
11MU1.06%2,601,977$742.6M
12CSCO1.02%9,268,948$714.0M
13UNH1.00%2,119,121$699.5M
14WFC0.98%7,320,588$682.3M
15CVX0.95%4,362,955$665.0M

2026-05-19

15 holdings · 24.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1BRKB3.09%4,295,181$2.2B
2JPM2.92%6,326,366$2.0B
3GOOGL2.15%4,804,774$1.5B
4AMZN2.03%6,141,527$1.4B
5GOOG1.76%3,912,248$1.2B
6XOM1.70%9,838,666$1.2B
7JNJ1.66%5,604,063$1.2B
8WMT1.46%9,119,401$1.0B
9BAC1.12%14,254,889$784.0M
10PG1.12%5,469,933$783.9M
11MU1.06%2,601,977$742.6M
12CSCO1.02%9,268,948$714.0M
13UNH1.00%2,119,121$699.5M
14WFC0.98%7,320,588$682.3M
15CVX0.95%4,362,955$665.0M

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

15.6%
Annual Volatility
1.65
Sharpe (1Y)
-12.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure

Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this ETF's returns.

0.82
Market β
+0.044
Size (SMB)
Neutral
+0.313
Value (HML)
Value tilt
-0.065
Profit (RMW)
Neutral
+0.253
Invest (CMA)
Conservative
Alpha (annual): -1.06%
R²: 94.1%of variance explained by 5 factors

Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove IWD Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.78%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

+0.055%
+0.041%
+0.029%

Top Detractors

-0.017%
-0.018%
-0.024%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current price action for the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF at $236.32 suggests a consolidation phase where larger market participants may be assessing valuation levels before committing to directional moves. The absence of significant volume spikes alongside this price level indicates that institutional positioning is likely neutral or in a state of accumulation rather than aggressive distribution or deployment. Without clear SMA crossovers confirming a trend shift, the data implies that major players are not yet signaling a definitive change in their stance toward large-cap value equities, potentially waiting for further fundamental catalysts to justify reallocating significant capital. Volume trends remain subdued relative to historical averages during this period, which often characterizes times when institutional flow is minimal or balanced between buyers and sellers. This lack of conviction in trading activity can suggest that sophisticated investors are closely monitoring macroeconomic indicators before entering substantial positions. The technical structure currently reflects a waiting game rather than an active battle for control of the asset price, leaving room for either upward momentum if valuation gaps close or continued stagnation if external pressures persist. Market participants should interpret this setup as a period of uncertainty where institutional intent is not clearly articulated through standard volume-price confirmation mechanisms.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

1.21%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How IWD’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2457 snapshots
Other20.1%
Financial Services14.0%
Healthcare10.0%
Industrials9.6%
Technology9.1%
Communication Services7.6%
Energy7.0%
Consumer Defensive7.0%
Consumer Cyclical5.9%
Utilities4.4%
Real Estate3.2%
Basic Materials2.1%
Change since 2026-03-26
Energy
+1.8%
Financial Services
-1.7%
Communication Services
-0.5%
Healthcare
-0.4%
Industrials
+0.4%
Consumer Cyclical
-0.4%
2026-03-262026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

AUM & Capital Flow Tracker

Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.

Total Net Assets
$70.31B
Est. AUM Change (90d)
+$6.20B
Price Change (90d)
+9.54%
Filing Snapshots
2
01-2302-1303-0903-3004-2105-1206-02$62.50B$66.85B$71.21B
Estimated AUMTNA Filing Date

Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($70.31B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.