iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF(IWD)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF maintains a substantial asset base of nearly $70 billion, reflecting significant investor interest in value-oriented large-cap equities. Its portfolio construction demonstrates a distinct tilt toward financial services and healthcare, which together account for over one-quarter of the total allocation, while industrials and technology sectors round out the top four exposures at roughly 19% combined. This sector distribution suggests a strategy that prioritizes established companies with stable earnings potential rather than high-growth tech firms alone, although technology remains a notable component given its nearly double-digit weighting compared to many growth indices.
Concentration analysis reveals a moderate level of risk associated with the top ten holdings, which collectively represent approximately 19% of assets under management. Notably, Berkshire Hathaway leads this concentration group at just under three percent, followed closely by major financial and energy names like JPMorgan Chase, ExxonMobil, and Chevron. The inclusion of diverse sectors within these top positions—from communication services to consumer defensives—indicates a broad-based approach rather than an aggressive bet on a single industry vertical. However, the presence of multiple heavyweight players in both finance and energy implies that macroeconomic shifts affecting these specific industries could have a disproportionately large impact on the fund's overall performance relative to more diversified peers.
Quantitatively, the fund's composition aligns with a value strategy by overweighting traditional economic drivers such as banking and industrial manufacturing while maintaining exposure to defensive healthcare staples. The geographic profile is implicitly global given the international nature of some holdings like Alphabet, though the primary driver remains domestic large-cap value stocks. This structure offers investors access to a curated slice of the Russell 1000 universe that emphasizes undervalued metrics rather than momentum or growth factors. Ultimately, the ETF serves as a vehicle for capturing returns from specific segments of the market defined by low price-to-book ratios and strong cash flow generation, allowing participants to express a view on value without directly purchasing individual securities.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 10:19:52.645512+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100The investment theme implied by the name "Russell 1000 Value" is executed with high fidelity, as the portfolio composition strictly adheres to a broad-based value factor strategy rather than pursuing a specific industry or innovation narrative. The top holdings reflect this approach through significant exposure to established leaders across diverse sectors such as financial services, healthcare, and industrials, which are traditional staples of a value-oriented index. While mega-cap technology and communication service firms like Alphabet and Amazon appear in the top ten, their inclusion aligns with the objective of capturing large-value stocks within the broader Russell 1000 universe rather than indicating a tilt toward growth or specific thematic trends. The presence of these well-known entities alongside utilities and real estate suggests the fund is maintaining its mandate to track the value segment of the total market without deviating into niche strategies that would dilute this core definition.
Sector coherence remains robust, with financial services holding the largest weight at 14.1%, followed by healthcare and industrials, all representing historically defensive or cyclical value plays typical of such indices. The distribution across twelve distinct sectors demonstrates a lack of concentration risk in any single industry, ensuring that performance is driven by the aggregate behavior of large-cap value stocks rather than idiosyncratic moves within one field. With a top-ten concentration of 19.3%, the fund avoids over-reliance on individual issuers while still benefiting from liquidity and stability provided by its largest constituents. This structure effectively differentiates the vehicle from broad market indices only through its specific valuation methodology, as evidenced by the sector weights that favor mature industries over speculative growth segments, thereby maintaining a clear distinction based on value characteristics rather than total market exposure.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 09:16:01.294501+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF exhibits a sector profile heavily weighted toward Financial Services, which accounts for nearly fourteen percent of the portfolio and serves as the largest single allocation. This significant exposure aligns with the traditional value investing thesis that often favors sectors characterized by stable cash flows and tangible assets, though it also introduces notable sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations and economic cycles affecting lending institutions. Healthcare follows at ten point one percent, providing a substantial defensive layer within the portfolio structure, while Industrials and Technology each hold just under ten percent, indicating a balanced but not aggressive tilt toward growth-oriented sectors relative to their historical weightings in broad value indices.
Concentration risk is mitigated by the fund's diversification across twelve distinct sectors, yet the top five holdings collectively represent nearly twenty percent of total assets, with Berkshire Hathaway alone comprising almost three percent despite its unique classification challenges. The presence of major players like JPMorgan Chase and Exxon Mobil in the upper echelon reinforces the financial and energy dominance typical of value strategies, while the inclusion of large-cap tech names such as Alphabet suggests an attempt to capture undervalued growth elements often overlooked by pure-growth screens. Utilities and Real Estate remain minor components at four point four percent and three point three percent respectively, signaling that the fund does not prioritize income-heavy or land-intensive sectors over those with higher earnings yield potential.
Factor tilts evident in this allocation suggest a strategy prioritizing low price-to-book ratios and high dividend yields found predominantly in financials and energy stocks, rather than seeking exposure to small-cap value or momentum factors. The relatively lower weightings in Consumer Cyclical goods and Basic Materials further distinguish the portfolio from more cyclical industrial playbooks, favoring established businesses with pricing power over emerging commodity-dependent firms. Ultimately, this sector distribution reflects a deliberate focus on large-cap equities that have historically traded at discounts to intrinsic value, balancing stability through financial services exposure with moderate diversification into defensive healthcare and industrials without relying heavily on volatile real estate or material extraction sectors.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 14:45:52.812144+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share IWD's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of IWD's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | $80B | — | 799 | 95.7% |
| SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | $37B | — | 786 | 94.8% |
| SCHXSCHX | $61B | — | 581 | 91.2% |
| RSPRSP | $83B | — | 426 | 88.9% |
| ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF | $28B | — | 419 | 87.1% |
96% of IWD's portfolio by weight is also held by ITOT. When ITOT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging IWD's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofIWD's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 80% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 69% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside IWD collectively pay out 72% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 53% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryIWD is up 27.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +17.2%. The remaining +10.5% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 68% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of IWD's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of IWD's analyzed weight, 60% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 40% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 60% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
IWD has a Passive Crowding Score of 39/100. On average, 11.7% of the market capitalization of IWD's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 9 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. | 2.91% | — | — |
| 2 | JPM | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. Financial Services | 2.63% | 14.3x | 3/9 |
| 3 | XOM | EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION Energy | 2.36% | 24.5x | 5/9 |
| 4 | GOOGL | ALPHABET INC. Communication Services | 1.95% | 29.0x | 6/9 |
| 5 | JNJ | JOHNSON & JOHNSON Healthcare | 1.94% | 26.1x | 4/9 |
| 6 | AMZN | AMAZON.COM, INC. Consumer Cyclical | 1.81% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 7 | WMT | WALMART INC. Consumer Defensive | 1.60% | 40.8x | 7/9 |
| 8 | GOOG | ALPHABET INC. Communication Services | 1.59% | 28.7x | 6/9 |
| 9 | CVX | CHEVRON CORPORATION Energy | 1.28% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 10 | MU | MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. Technology | 1.24% | 45.9x | 7/9 |
| 11 | PG | THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Consumer Defensive | 1.12% | 21.0x | 6/9 |
| 12 | CSCO | CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. Technology | 1.02% | 40.1x | 8/9 |
| 13 | MRK | MERCK & CO., INC. Healthcare | 0.98% | 33.4x | 4/9 |
| 14 | BAC | BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION Financial Services | 0.97% | 12.8x | 5/9 |
| 15 | CAT | CATERPILLAR INC. Industrials | 0.95% | 43.7x | 6/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how IWD’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 24.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 2.91% | 4,235,666 | $2.0B |
| 2 | JPM | 2.63% | 6,238,632 | $1.8B |
| 3 | XOM | 2.36% | 9,702,185 | $1.6B |
| 4 | GOOGL | 1.95% | 4,738,196 | $1.4B |
| 5 | JNJ | 1.94% | 5,526,423 | $1.4B |
| 6 | AMZN | 1.81% | 6,056,436 | $1.3B |
| 7 | WMT | 1.60% | 8,993,050 | $1.1B |
| 8 | GOOG | 1.59% | 3,858,035 | $1.1B |
| 9 | CVX | 1.28% | 4,302,429 | $890.2M |
| 10 | MU | 1.24% | 2,565,926 | $866.9M |
| 11 | PG | 1.12% | 5,394,124 | $779.1M |
| 12 | CSCO | 1.02% | 9,140,516 | $709.2M |
| 13 | MRK | 0.98% | 5,707,253 | $686.5M |
| 14 | BAC | 0.97% | 13,883,945 | $676.8M |
| 15 | CAT | 0.95% | 932,467 | $660.6M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 24.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 2.91% | 4,235,666 | $2.0B |
| 2 | JPM | 2.63% | 6,238,632 | $1.8B |
| 3 | XOM | 2.36% | 9,702,185 | $1.6B |
| 4 | GOOGL | 1.95% | 4,738,196 | $1.4B |
| 5 | JNJ | 1.94% | 5,526,423 | $1.4B |
| 6 | AMZN | 1.81% | 6,056,436 | $1.3B |
| 7 | WMT | 1.60% | 8,993,050 | $1.1B |
| 8 | GOOG | 1.59% | 3,858,035 | $1.1B |
| 9 | CVX | 1.28% | 4,302,429 | $890.2M |
| 10 | MU | 1.24% | 2,565,926 | $866.9M |
| 11 | PG | 1.12% | 5,394,124 | $779.1M |
| 12 | CSCO | 1.02% | 9,140,516 | $709.2M |
| 13 | MRK | 0.98% | 5,707,253 | $686.5M |
| 14 | BAC | 0.97% | 13,883,945 | $676.8M |
| 15 | CAT | 0.95% | 932,467 | $660.6M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 24.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.09% | 4,295,181 | $2.2B |
| 2 | JPM | 2.92% | 6,326,366 | $2.0B |
| 3 | GOOGL | 2.15% | 4,804,774 | $1.5B |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.03% | 6,141,527 | $1.4B |
| 5 | GOOG | 1.76% | 3,912,248 | $1.2B |
| 6 | XOM | 1.70% | 9,838,666 | $1.2B |
| 7 | JNJ | 1.66% | 5,604,063 | $1.2B |
| 8 | WMT | 1.46% | 9,119,401 | $1.0B |
| 9 | BAC | 1.12% | 14,254,889 | $784.0M |
| 10 | PG | 1.12% | 5,469,933 | $783.9M |
| 11 | MU | 1.06% | 2,601,977 | $742.6M |
| 12 | CSCO | 1.02% | 9,268,948 | $714.0M |
| 13 | UNH | 1.00% | 2,119,121 | $699.5M |
| 14 | WFC | 0.98% | 7,320,588 | $682.3M |
| 15 | CVX | 0.95% | 4,362,955 | $665.0M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 24.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.09% | 4,295,181 | $2.2B |
| 2 | JPM | 2.92% | 6,326,366 | $2.0B |
| 3 | GOOGL | 2.15% | 4,804,774 | $1.5B |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.03% | 6,141,527 | $1.4B |
| 5 | GOOG | 1.76% | 3,912,248 | $1.2B |
| 6 | XOM | 1.70% | 9,838,666 | $1.2B |
| 7 | JNJ | 1.66% | 5,604,063 | $1.2B |
| 8 | WMT | 1.46% | 9,119,401 | $1.0B |
| 9 | BAC | 1.12% | 14,254,889 | $784.0M |
| 10 | PG | 1.12% | 5,469,933 | $783.9M |
| 11 | MU | 1.06% | 2,601,977 | $742.6M |
| 12 | CSCO | 1.02% | 9,268,948 | $714.0M |
| 13 | UNH | 1.00% | 2,119,121 | $699.5M |
| 14 | WFC | 0.98% | 7,320,588 | $682.3M |
| 15 | CVX | 0.95% | 4,362,955 | $665.0M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 24.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.09% | 4,295,181 | $2.2B |
| 2 | JPM | 2.92% | 6,326,366 | $2.0B |
| 3 | GOOGL | 2.15% | 4,804,774 | $1.5B |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.03% | 6,141,527 | $1.4B |
| 5 | GOOG | 1.76% | 3,912,248 | $1.2B |
| 6 | XOM | 1.70% | 9,838,666 | $1.2B |
| 7 | JNJ | 1.66% | 5,604,063 | $1.2B |
| 8 | WMT | 1.46% | 9,119,401 | $1.0B |
| 9 | BAC | 1.12% | 14,254,889 | $784.0M |
| 10 | PG | 1.12% | 5,469,933 | $783.9M |
| 11 | MU | 1.06% | 2,601,977 | $742.6M |
| 12 | CSCO | 1.02% | 9,268,948 | $714.0M |
| 13 | UNH | 1.00% | 2,119,121 | $699.5M |
| 14 | WFC | 0.98% | 7,320,588 | $682.3M |
| 15 | CVX | 0.95% | 4,362,955 | $665.0M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 24.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BRKB | 3.09% | 4,295,181 | $2.2B |
| 2 | JPM | 2.92% | 6,326,366 | $2.0B |
| 3 | GOOGL | 2.15% | 4,804,774 | $1.5B |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.03% | 6,141,527 | $1.4B |
| 5 | GOOG | 1.76% | 3,912,248 | $1.2B |
| 6 | XOM | 1.70% | 9,838,666 | $1.2B |
| 7 | JNJ | 1.66% | 5,604,063 | $1.2B |
| 8 | WMT | 1.46% | 9,119,401 | $1.0B |
| 9 | BAC | 1.12% | 14,254,889 | $784.0M |
| 10 | PG | 1.12% | 5,469,933 | $783.9M |
| 11 | MU | 1.06% | 2,601,977 | $742.6M |
| 12 | CSCO | 1.02% | 9,268,948 | $714.0M |
| 13 | UNH | 1.00% | 2,119,121 | $699.5M |
| 14 | WFC | 0.98% | 7,320,588 | $682.3M |
| 15 | CVX | 0.95% | 4,362,955 | $665.0M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this ETF's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove IWD Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price action for the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF at $236.32 suggests a consolidation phase where larger market participants may be assessing valuation levels before committing to directional moves. The absence of significant volume spikes alongside this price level indicates that institutional positioning is likely neutral or in a state of accumulation rather than aggressive distribution or deployment. Without clear SMA crossovers confirming a trend shift, the data implies that major players are not yet signaling a definitive change in their stance toward large-cap value equities, potentially waiting for further fundamental catalysts to justify reallocating significant capital. Volume trends remain subdued relative to historical averages during this period, which often characterizes times when institutional flow is minimal or balanced between buyers and sellers. This lack of conviction in trading activity can suggest that sophisticated investors are closely monitoring macroeconomic indicators before entering substantial positions. The technical structure currently reflects a waiting game rather than an active battle for control of the asset price, leaving room for either upward momentum if valuation gaps close or continued stagnation if external pressures persist. Market participants should interpret this setup as a period of uncertainty where institutional intent is not clearly articulated through standard volume-price confirmation mechanisms.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How IWD’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
AUM & Capital Flow Tracker
Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.
Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($70.31B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.