IWR(IWR)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards technology, with a significant presence in consumer cyclical and financial services sectors as well. This is evident from the top holdings, which include several high-growth tech stocks such as DDOG and SNOW, alongside other large-cap companies like RCL and NET. The weighted P/E ratio of 32.9x suggests that the portfolio has a relatively high valuation posture compared to the broader market.
The concentration risk in this portfolio is elevated due to its top-heavy structure, with six holdings each accounting for approximately 0.6% of the AUM. This may make it vulnerable to sector-specific downturns or individual stock performance fluctuations. The portfolio's sector mix appears to be more concentrated in growth-oriented sectors, which could be favorable in a strong economic expansion but potentially challenging during periods of rising interest rates or slowing global growth.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 07:34:19.845922+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 25/100The investment theme implied by the ticker IWR, which typically denotes a broad international stock strategy, appears significantly misaligned with the provided holding data. The top ten positions consist almost entirely of large-cap US equities spanning Technology and Industrials sectors, including names like Seagate Technology and Western Digital that are domestic market leaders rather than global diversified holdings expected under an international mandate. Notably, these specific companies represent a mere 8.1% combined weight within the portfolio, suggesting they serve as minor stabilizers or accidental exposures rather than core thematic drivers. The inclusion of financial services and energy firms further dilutes any potential narrative focus on technology-driven globalization, indicating that the fund's composition does not reflect the international scope usually associated with its classification.
Sector coherence is notably low given the fragmented nature of the top holdings across Technology, Industrials, Financial Services, and Energy without a clear dominant industry cluster typical of thematic funds. While the sector weights for Technology at 3.8% and Industrials at 3.1% are present, they remain relatively small compared to what one might expect from a fund with substantial assets under management if it were truly focused on specific global innovation or industrial expansion themes. The extremely low top-ten concentration of 8.1% suggests an ultra-diversified approach that mirrors broad market indices rather than maintaining the concentrated exposure required for distinct thematic differentiation. Consequently, the portfolio structure resembles a generalized large-cap equity basket more closely than a specialized vehicle designed to capture specific international growth trends or sector-specific opportunities.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 06:12:49.587449+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of IWR presents a highly concentrated profile focused on specific industrial and technology sub-sectors, deviating significantly from broad market diversification. With Technology comprising 3.8% and Industrials accounting for 3.1%, these two sectors dominate the portfolio's exposure, while Financial Services and Energy represent negligible fractions at 0.7% and 0.6% respectively. This distribution suggests an investment thesis centered on capital-intensive infrastructure, data storage hardware, and power generation equipment rather than software or financial intermediaries. The top five holdings further illustrate this tilt, featuring companies like Super Micro Computer, Western Digital, Corning Incorporated, Vertiv Holdings, and Quanta Services, all of which are deeply embedded in the physical layers of digital connectivity and energy management.
Concentration risk is a defining characteristic of this fund structure, evidenced by the fact that the top ten holdings account for only 8.1% of total assets, yet individual positions like SNDK and WDC approach 1.2% alone within such a small overall footprint. While low absolute weights might initially appear dispersed to an untrained eye, the lack of exposure across major economic drivers implies extreme sensitivity to sector-specific cycles rather than broad macroeconomic trends. The fund's composition reveals a deliberate avoidance of large-cap tech giants or diversified financial institutions in favor of niche industrial players and specialized technology hardware manufacturers. Consequently, performance will likely correlate tightly with supply chain dynamics for data centers, semiconductor packaging materials, and grid infrastructure upgrades, exposing the portfolio to idiosyncratic risks within these narrow verticals while offering limited protection against downturns unrelated to physical capital expenditure cycles.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 09:59:10.960628+00
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 79% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 6% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryIWR is up 17.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +45.5%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 27.9% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 6% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DDOG | Datadog Inc Class A Technology | 0.62% | 663.3x | 6/9 |
| 2 | SNOW | Snowflake Inc Ordinary Shares Technology | 0.62% | — | 5/9 |
| 3 | RCL | Royal Caribbean Group Consumer Cyclical | 0.58% | 17.9x | 7/9 |
| 4 | NET | Cloudflare Inc Technology | 0.56% | — | 4/9 |
| 5 | HOOD | Robinhood Markets Inc Class A Financial Services | 0.56% | 51.5x | 4/9 |
| 6 | TER | Teradyne Inc Technology | 0.55% | 59.9x | 5/9 |
| 7 | MPC | Marathon Petroleum Corp Energy | 0.54% | 20.1x | 7/9 |
| 8 | ALAB | Astera Labs Inc Technology | 0.53% | 216.9x | 5/9 |
| 9 | SPG | Simon Property Group Inc Real Estate | 0.52% | 15.9x | 4/9 |
| 10 | URI | United Rentals Inc Industrials | 0.51% | 27.4x | 4/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how IWR’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-07-19
10 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight2026-07-18
10 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight2026-07-17
10 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight2026-07-16
10 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight2026-07-15
10 holdings · 5.6% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove IWR Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe current price of $105.92 for IWR presents a specific snapshot, yet without accompanying data on Simple Moving Average crossovers or volume trends, it is impossible to discern the positioning strategies of larger market participants. Institutional behavior often manifests through sustained volume spikes preceding significant price moves or divergences between price action and moving averages; however, these critical signals are absent from the provided information. Consequently, no definitive conclusion can be drawn regarding whether major holders are accumulating or distributing shares at this level based solely on the single data point offered. Technical analysis relies heavily on context derived from a broader tapestry of metrics including relative strength index readings, support and resistance levels, and historical volatility patterns to infer institutional intent. In their absence, any attempt to speculate on large-cap player positioning would be purely conjectural rather than evidence-based. The solitary figure of $105.92 does not reveal the momentum shifts or capital flow dynamics that typically accompany strategic entries or exits by sophisticated investors. Without corroborating indicators such as volume profiles or trend line interactions, the technical setup remains undefined regarding institutional activity. Market participants must await further data confirmation to identify potential patterns in how larger entities might be structuring their positions relative to this current valuation point.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How IWR’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.