ETF · Broad Market

TOTL(TOTL)

$39.16
+0.01%
Expense Ratio
$4.2B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Moderate
0%20%60%100%
52.3%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is dominated by other industries, making up approximately 5.6% of its total holdings, with no specific sectors disclosed among its top holdings.

Given the lack of specific sector exposure and top holdings information, it's challenging to assess concentration risk or single-stock dominance. However, the relatively low sector allocation percentage may suggest a more diversified portfolio, but this is largely speculative without further data. The overall market-cap profile and valuation posture also remain unclear due to the limited information provided. A macro environment with significant sector rotation could present challenges for this portfolio if it's heavily reliant on specific industries not disclosed here.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 09:13:26.367315+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 15/100

The provided data presents a significant disconnect between the implied investment theme of an ETF and its actual composition, as no specific holdings or sector breakdown were listed to confirm alignment with any stated objective. The absence of identifiable assets makes it impossible to verify if the portfolio adheres to a particular strategy such as technology exposure, dividend growth, or emerging markets, rendering a thematic assessment purely speculative based on missing information. Furthermore, while the top-10 concentration is noted at 7.9%, this metric appears inconsistent with standard industry reporting where single-stock weights are typically disclosed; without knowing which specific entities comprise these positions, one cannot determine if they represent broad-market giants or niche thematic leaders, leaving the fund's true focus obscured by incomplete data.

The lack of sector weightings prevents an evaluation of whether the portfolio is genuinely differentiated from a broad market index or if it suffers from hidden concentration risks that mimic diversification while actually relying on a narrow set of large-cap equities. Without visibility into individual stock weights beyond the aggregate top-10 figure, it remains unclear if the fund maintains strict adherence to its purported strategy or if it utilizes generic names to stabilize returns without delivering thematic exposure. Consequently, potential investors cannot ascertain if the vehicle offers true alpha generation relative to a benchmark or if the structure simply mirrors wide-market performance under a misleading label, highlighting a critical gap between the product's marketing identity and the verifiable reality of its underlying assets.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 14:09:15.128535+00

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400032
Well Diversified
Top 5: 5.6%Top 10: 5.6%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Small Value

Under the Hood — Top 1 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration5.6%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1-
Prestige Brands 5.6467 07/01/2033
5.65%

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how TOTL’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-19

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.65%11,525

2026-07-18

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.65%11,525

2026-07-17

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.65%11,525

2026-07-16

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.65%11,521

2026-07-15

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.65%11,521

2026-07-14

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.65%11,521

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

5.5%
Annual Volatility
-0.70
Sharpe (1Y)
-0.22
Sharpe (3Y)
-6.6%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-16.5%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How TOTL’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1994 snapshots
Other100.0%
2026-03-302026-07-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.