iShares MSCI World ETF(URTH)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) presents a distinct market profile characterized by significant concentration within the technology sector, which commands over 21% of its portfolio weight. This heavy tilt is driven largely by massive individual positions in major tech giants; NVIDIA and Apple alone account for nearly half of the fund's total assets under management when combined with Microsoft, creating substantial exposure to semiconductor and software equities. The top ten holdings further illustrate this dominance, as they collectively represent a vast majority of the asset base, leaving relatively smaller allocations to other sectors like financial services, consumer cyclicals, and healthcare despite their traditional roles in global diversified indices.
Geographically, while the ticker name suggests broad international coverage, the provided holding data reveals an intense focus on specific multinational corporations that often operate with significant US-centric revenue streams or are domiciled within North American markets. The portfolio's composition is heavily skewed toward mega-cap technology leaders rather than a balanced representation of small-to-mid cap firms across diverse global regions. With assets under management totaling $7.3 billion, the fund maintains a moderate scale compared to its larger peers in the MSCI World space, yet its internal structure mirrors that of more specialized US-focused tech funds due to the overwhelming weight of its top constituents. Investors examining this vehicle should note that it functions less as a pure geographic diversification tool and more as a concentrated bet on the performance of leading global technology innovators, with sector weights deviating sharply from historical MSCI World benchmarks where financials typically hold greater prominence.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 02:07:28.428824+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100The investment theme implied by the ETF name, iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH), suggests a broad exposure to developed markets across all sectors. The actual holdings list reveals a significant concentration in mega-cap technology and communication services firms such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Meta, and Tesla, which collectively dominate the top ten positions by weight. While these companies are global leaders rather than thematic outliers for a world index, their heavy weighting indicates that the fund's performance is heavily influenced by large-cap equities in specific industries, potentially diluting exposure to smaller or mid-sized companies across other sectors of the developed world economy.
Sector weights show Technology at 21.5% and Communication Services at 7.4%, creating a combined dominance for these two areas that exceeds typical broad market averages where technology usually sits around 13-15%. Financial services, consumer cyclicals, healthcare, industrials, and other sectors maintain relatively balanced representations consistent with global economic structures, suggesting the fund maintains general diversification despite the top-heavy tech exposure. The top-ten concentration of 24.8% reflects standard large-cap weighting patterns found in many developed market indices rather than an extreme lack of diversity. Ultimately, while the name implies a comprehensive geographic and sectoral sweep, the underlying composition leans heavily toward dominant global corporations within specific high-growth sectors, which may result in returns that diverge from a truly neutral broad-market benchmark during periods where those specific industries underperform relative to others.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 15:16:45.760104+00
⚠️ Systemic Risk Synthesis
AI GeneratedThe newly disclosed risk factors from the top holdings of this fund highlight a convergence of systemic threats centered on regulatory expansion across environmental, cybersecurity, and artificial intelligence domains. Multiple major technology constituents are explicitly flagging that compliance with evolving climate change regulations could materially adversely impact their financial conditions, suggesting a broadening macro pressure regarding sustainability mandates within the sector. Simultaneously, there is a distinct emergence of risks related to data privacy requirements and responsible AI usage, which companies indicate may drive up operational costs while constraining competitive positioning. These disclosures collectively point to an external environment where regulatory bodies are actively shaping industry standards in ways that could impose significant new burdens on large-cap technology firms simultaneously.
The concentration of these specific risk categories among the fund's highest-weighted positions signals a high degree of correlated downside potential if global regulators tighten enforcement or introduce stricter mandates. With NVDA, representing 5.0% of the portfolio alone, identifying material impacts from climate regulations alongside cost increases from cybersecurity and AI compliance, the exposure to this regulatory headwind is not diluted across diverse sectors but rather clustered within the technology leadership tier. The fact that these same themes appear in multiple top-tier holdings suggests that a shift in policy regarding digital privacy or green energy standards could trigger synchronized adjustments in earnings expectations for a substantial portion of the fund's value, thereby amplifying portfolio volatility should such regulatory trends accelerate.
While the systemic risks are broad, the sheer weight of NVDA at 5.0% means that any material adverse outcome specifically tied to its compliance with climate or AI regulations would have an outsized effect on the overall fund performance compared to lower-weighted holdings. Although other top constituents like AAPL and MSFT carry significant weights, their specific risk disclosures in this dataset are less detailed than NVDA's; however, the presence of similar regulatory themes across the group implies that the aggregate impact may extend beyond a single company. The interplay between rising operational costs from these new compliance requirements and potential competitive erosion creates a complex landscape where macro-level policy shifts could disproportionately influence the fund's trajectory through its largest individual exposures.
Synthesized from constituent 10-K risk factor disclosures. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 00:19:50.215949+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of the iShares MSCI World ETF reveals a pronounced tilt toward technology and innovation-driven industries, with these two sectors comprising nearly 30% of the total portfolio weight. This heavy exposure is further amplified by the top five holdings, which are dominated by major technology giants like NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google. Such a concentration indicates an investment thesis heavily weighted on expectations for continued growth in digital infrastructure, software services, and consumer electronics within developed markets. The significant weighting of large-cap tech stocks suggests the fund is positioned to capture momentum from secular trends such as artificial intelligence adoption and cloud computing expansion, while simultaneously accepting elevated volatility associated with these specific market leaders.
Despite holding over 500 underlying securities across diverse industries, the portfolio exhibits notable concentration risk due to the sheer magnitude of its top ten holdings, which account for nearly a quarter of assets under management. While the fund maintains exposure to traditional pillars like financial services and healthcare, their weights remain relatively modest compared to the tech dominance. The minimal allocation to defensive sectors such as utilities, real estate, and basic materials implies that the strategy is not currently structured to provide significant downside protection during periods of economic contraction or high inflation. Instead, the asset mix reflects a bullish outlook on cyclicality and growth potential at the expense of stability, leaving the fund's performance closely correlated with the fortunes of its largest technology constituents rather than offering broad-based diversification across all market styles.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 09:23:33.731929+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share URTH's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of URTH's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF | $28B | — | 1318 | 99.9% |
| ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF | $80B | — | 543 | 70.1% |
| SCHBSchwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | $37B | — | 540 | 69.8% |
| SCHXSCHX | $61B | — | 535 | 69.7% |
| IVViShares Core S&P 500 ETF | $762B | 0.03% | 459 | 68.1% |
100% of URTH's portfolio by weight is also held by ACWI, which commands 4× more assets under management. When ACWI receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging URTH's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofURTH's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 76% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 63% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside URTH collectively pay out 38% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 51% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryURTH is up 27.0% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +34.3%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 7.3% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 62% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of URTH's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of URTH's analyzed weight, 81% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 19% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 56% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
URTH has a Passive Crowding Score of 32/100. On average, 9.6% of the market capitalization of URTH's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 52 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | NVIDIA Corp Technology | 5.04% | 32.4x | 4/9 |
| 2 | AAPL | Apple Inc Technology | 4.58% | 37.7x | 8/9 |
| 3 | MSFT | Microsoft Corp Technology | 3.24% | 26.8x | 5/9 |
| 4 | AMZN | Amazon.com Inc Consumer Cyclical | 2.36% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 5 | GOOGL | Alphabet Inc Communication Services | 2.12% | 29.0x | 6/9 |
| 6 | GOOG | Alphabet Inc Communication Services | 1.78% | 28.7x | 6/9 |
| 7 | AVGO | Broadcom Inc Technology | 1.68% | 86.9x | 8/9 |
| 8 | META | Meta Platforms Inc Communication Services | 1.64% | 23.0x | 5/9 |
| 9 | TSLA | Tesla Inc Consumer Cyclical | 1.33% | 399.8x | 5/9 |
| 10 | LLY | Eli Lilly & Co Healthcare | 0.99% | 39.2x | 7/9 |
| 11 | JPM | JPMorgan Chase & Co Financial Services | 0.97% | 14.3x | 3/9 |
| 12 | BRKB | Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 0.81% | — | — |
| 13 | XOM | Exxon Mobil Corp Energy | 0.76% | 24.5x | 5/9 |
| 14 | JNJ | Johnson & Johnson Healthcare | 0.70% | 26.1x | 4/9 |
| 15 | NL0010273215 | ASML Holding NV | 0.66% | 53.5x | 8/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how URTH’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 28.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 5.04% | 1,966,362 | $348.4M |
| 2 | AAPL | 4.58% | 1,200,178 | $317.1M |
| 3 | MSFT | 3.24% | 571,418 | $224.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.36% | 776,397 | $163.0M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 2.12% | 470,263 | $146.6M |
| 6 | GOOG | 1.78% | 395,224 | $123.1M |
| 7 | AVGO | 1.68% | 362,880 | $116.0M |
| 8 | META | 1.64% | 175,548 | $113.8M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.33% | 228,496 | $92.0M |
| 10 | LLY | 0.99% | 65,099 | $68.5M |
| 11 | JPM | 0.97% | 222,370 | $66.8M |
| 12 | BRKB | 0.81% | 111,533 | $56.3M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.76% | 344,764 | $52.6M |
| 14 | JNJ | 0.70% | 194,347 | $48.3M |
| 15 | NL0010273215 | 0.66% | 31,391 | $45.7M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 28.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 5.04% | 1,966,362 | $348.4M |
| 2 | AAPL | 4.58% | 1,200,178 | $317.1M |
| 3 | MSFT | 3.24% | 571,418 | $224.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.36% | 776,397 | $163.0M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 2.12% | 470,263 | $146.6M |
| 6 | GOOG | 1.78% | 395,224 | $123.1M |
| 7 | AVGO | 1.68% | 362,880 | $116.0M |
| 8 | META | 1.64% | 175,548 | $113.8M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.33% | 228,496 | $92.0M |
| 10 | LLY | 0.99% | 65,099 | $68.5M |
| 11 | JPM | 0.97% | 222,370 | $66.8M |
| 12 | BRKB | 0.81% | 111,533 | $56.3M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.76% | 344,764 | $52.6M |
| 14 | JNJ | 0.70% | 194,347 | $48.3M |
| 15 | NL0010273215 | 0.66% | 31,391 | $45.7M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 28.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 5.04% | 1,966,362 | $348.4M |
| 2 | AAPL | 4.58% | 1,200,178 | $317.1M |
| 3 | MSFT | 3.24% | 571,418 | $224.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.36% | 776,397 | $163.0M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 2.12% | 470,263 | $146.6M |
| 6 | GOOG | 1.78% | 395,224 | $123.1M |
| 7 | AVGO | 1.68% | 362,880 | $116.0M |
| 8 | META | 1.64% | 175,548 | $113.8M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.33% | 228,496 | $92.0M |
| 10 | LLY | 0.99% | 65,099 | $68.5M |
| 11 | JPM | 0.97% | 222,370 | $66.8M |
| 12 | BRKB | 0.81% | 111,533 | $56.3M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.76% | 344,764 | $52.6M |
| 14 | JNJ | 0.70% | 194,347 | $48.3M |
| 15 | NL0010273215 | 0.66% | 31,391 | $45.7M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 28.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 5.04% | 1,966,362 | $348.4M |
| 2 | AAPL | 4.58% | 1,200,178 | $317.1M |
| 3 | MSFT | 3.24% | 571,418 | $224.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.36% | 776,397 | $163.0M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 2.12% | 470,263 | $146.6M |
| 6 | GOOG | 1.78% | 395,224 | $123.1M |
| 7 | AVGO | 1.68% | 362,880 | $116.0M |
| 8 | META | 1.64% | 175,548 | $113.8M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.33% | 228,496 | $92.0M |
| 10 | LLY | 0.99% | 65,099 | $68.5M |
| 11 | JPM | 0.97% | 222,370 | $66.8M |
| 12 | BRKB | 0.81% | 111,533 | $56.3M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.76% | 344,764 | $52.6M |
| 14 | JNJ | 0.70% | 194,347 | $48.3M |
| 15 | NL0010273215 | 0.66% | 31,391 | $45.7M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 28.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 5.04% | 1,966,362 | $348.4M |
| 2 | AAPL | 4.58% | 1,200,178 | $317.1M |
| 3 | MSFT | 3.24% | 571,418 | $224.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.36% | 776,397 | $163.0M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 2.12% | 470,263 | $146.6M |
| 6 | GOOG | 1.78% | 395,224 | $123.1M |
| 7 | AVGO | 1.68% | 362,880 | $116.0M |
| 8 | META | 1.64% | 175,548 | $113.8M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.33% | 228,496 | $92.0M |
| 10 | LLY | 0.99% | 65,099 | $68.5M |
| 11 | JPM | 0.97% | 222,370 | $66.8M |
| 12 | BRKB | 0.81% | 111,533 | $56.3M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.76% | 344,764 | $52.6M |
| 14 | JNJ | 0.70% | 194,347 | $48.3M |
| 15 | NL0010273215 | 0.66% | 31,391 | $45.7M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 28.7% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA | 5.04% | 1,966,362 | $348.4M |
| 2 | AAPL | 4.58% | 1,200,178 | $317.1M |
| 3 | MSFT | 3.24% | 571,418 | $224.4M |
| 4 | AMZN | 2.36% | 776,397 | $163.0M |
| 5 | GOOGL | 2.12% | 470,263 | $146.6M |
| 6 | GOOG | 1.78% | 395,224 | $123.1M |
| 7 | AVGO | 1.68% | 362,880 | $116.0M |
| 8 | META | 1.64% | 175,548 | $113.8M |
| 9 | TSLA | 1.33% | 228,496 | $92.0M |
| 10 | LLY | 0.99% | 65,099 | $68.5M |
| 11 | JPM | 0.97% | 222,370 | $66.8M |
| 12 | BRKB | 0.81% | 111,533 | $56.3M |
| 13 | XOM | 0.76% | 344,764 | $52.6M |
| 14 | JNJ | 0.70% | 194,347 | $48.3M |
| 15 | NL0010273215 | 0.66% | 31,391 | $45.7M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this ETF's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove URTH Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedURTH is trading below its 50-day moving average but above the 200-day moving average, suggesting it may be in a short-term downtrend relative to recent prices. The RSI reading of 36.8 indicates that URTH currently has weaker momentum and could be considered oversold on a scale where readings under 30 are typically seen as very oversold.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How URTH’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
AUM & Capital Flow Tracker
Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.
Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($6.95B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.