USMV(USMV)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is remarkably balanced, with no single sector dominating the landscape. Technology and Healthcare sectors account for just over 6% of the fund's holdings combined, while Utilities and Real Estate each comprise around 3%. The presence of Financial Services and Other sectors adds to the diversification. This balance suggests a relatively stable and income-oriented investment approach.
The largest holdings are concentrated among large-cap companies with established track records, such as Johnson & Johnson and American Water Works. The weighted P/E ratio is above the market average, indicating that investors are willing to pay a premium for these securities. A favorable environment for this portfolio would likely be one characterized by stable economic growth, low interest rates, and a strong appetite for dividend-paying stocks. Conversely, a downturn in the Utilities or Real Estate sectors could pose challenges for this investment strategy.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 08:02:16.766428+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100The investment theme implied by the ticker USMV is ultra-low volatility, a concept that aligns closely with the composition of its top holdings. The fund heavily features established mega-cap stocks across diverse sectors such as technology, utilities, and energy, all known for their large market capitalizations and generally stable price histories compared to smaller growth or speculative equities. While specific individual weights are modest within this list, the selection criteria inherently favors companies with mature business models that typically exhibit lower beta values relative to the broader market. The presence of diversified giants like Cisco, Microsoft, and ExxonMobil supports a strategy focused on capital preservation rather than aggressive thematic exposure to niche industries or volatile small-cap segments.
Sector coherence remains high as the allocation spreads across multiple established industries without over-concentration in any single area that might introduce idiosyncratic risk. The technology sector, while prominent due to the inclusion of major players, accounts for only a fraction of the portfolio, preventing the fund from behaving like a pure tech index despite holding significant names. With top ten concentration limited to 15.6%, the structure avoids excessive reliance on just two or three stocks, reinforcing the objective of reducing overall portfolio volatility through diversification among large-cap leaders. This broad-based approach across utilities, financials, and industrials ensures that performance is driven by general market stability rather than exposure to a specific high-risk theme, effectively differentiating it from growth-oriented indices while maintaining strict adherence to low-volatility characteristics inherent in its constituent choices.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-17 22:09:52.754037+00
⚠️ Systemic Risk Synthesis
AI GeneratedThe newly disclosed risk factors from the top holdings of USMV highlight a convergence of macro-level threats centered on regulatory expansion and technological governance. A primary systemic concern is the escalating pressure from climate change regulations, which could materially impact financial conditions across multiple sectors as companies navigate stricter environmental compliance mandates. Simultaneously, there is a distinct emergence of risks related to artificial intelligence regulation; specifically, adherence to responsible AI usage standards presents potential cost increases that may alter competitive dynamics within high-growth technology segments. These disclosures suggest that external policy frameworks regarding sustainability and emerging technologies are becoming significant variables in corporate financial planning for this portfolio's largest constituents.
The concentration of these specific risk categories among the fund's top holdings indicates a notable degree of correlated downside exposure. The fact that multiple companies, including major players like NVIDIA, face material risks from climate regulations and AI governance suggests that sector-wide regulatory shifts could impact a substantial portion of the ETF's underlying value simultaneously rather than in isolation. This clustering implies that macroeconomic or legislative events targeting environmental standards or digital ethics have the potential to create synchronized headwinds across diverse industries represented in the fund, thereby reducing diversification benefits during periods of heightened regulatory scrutiny.
While systemic risks are prevalent, company-specific factors also warrant attention due to their weighting within the portfolio. For instance, NVIDIA holds a 1.6% weight and faces unique operational challenges stemming from data privacy requirements that could increase costs and affect business operations directly. Although this risk is not exclusive to the fund, its specific manifestation in a high-weight holding means any material adverse outcome related to cybersecurity compliance or AI regulation at NVIDIA would have a proportionally larger impact on the overall portfolio performance compared to lower-weighted peers facing similar but less weighted exposures.
Synthesized from constituent 10-K risk factor disclosures. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 08:59:36.889893+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation profile of USMV demonstrates a distinct tilt toward defensive and yield-oriented industries, with significant underweighting in the technology sector relative to broad market benchmarks. Although Technology remains the largest single industry exposure at 6.5%, this represents a minimal footprint compared to typical equity funds, while Utilities holds a notably elevated position at 3.1%. This distribution suggests an investment thesis focused on capital preservation and income generation rather than aggressive growth or beta capture. The presence of Energy, Financial Services, Communication Services, and Industrials each contributing less than 2% further reinforces the fund's strategy to minimize exposure to cyclical volatility associated with these sectors during periods of market stress.
Concentration risk within this portfolio appears managed through a deliberate diversification approach across multiple industries rather than reliance on individual large-cap leaders. The top five holdings, including major names in technology and energy, collectively account for only 8.1% of the total assets, while the concentration among the top ten positions remains low at 15.6%. This structural characteristic indicates that the fund is not designed to derive substantial performance from a few dominant stocks but instead aims for stability through broad representation within specific defensive niches. The limited number of holdings per sector, such as just four in Technology or two in Utilities, underscores an intent to avoid idiosyncratic risk associated with single-company events while maintaining exposure to the fundamental earnings potential of these traditionally lower-volatility industries.
Factor tilts implied by this allocation point toward a low-beta and potentially high-dividend yield strategy, diverging from the growth-at-a-reasonable-price or momentum factors prevalent in many modern equity vehicles. By capping technology exposure so tightly while maintaining meaningful positions in utilities and energy, the fund likely seeks to decouple performance from broader macroeconomic cycles that disproportionately affect high-growth tech equities. Investors examining this structure should consider how such a defensive posture might perform during inflationary environments or recessions where yield-seeking behavior typically dominates, contrasting sharply with funds heavily weighted toward volatile growth sectors.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 23:23:09.343288+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share USMV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 55% of USMV's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VONEVONE | $10B | — | 9 | 13.7% |
| SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | $640B | 0.09% | 9 | 13.7% |
| SPLGSPLG | $97B | — | 9 | 13.7% |
| QUSQUS | $1B | — | 9 | 13.7% |
| VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF | $1.5T | 0.03% | 9 | 13.7% |
14% of USMV's portfolio by weight is also held by VONE. When VONE receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging USMV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 69% ofUSMV's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 15% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside USMV collectively pay out 48% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 8% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryUSMV is up 5.2% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +19.1%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 13.9% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 14% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of USMV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of USMV's analyzed weight, 51% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 49% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 15% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
USMV has a Passive Crowding Score of 37/100. On average, 11.2% of the market capitalization of USMV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 29 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | APH | Amphenol Corp Class A Technology | 1.76% | 44.1x | 6/9 |
| 2 | JNJ | Johnson & Johnson Healthcare | 1.55% | 29.0x | 4/9 |
| 3 | VRTX | Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc Healthcare | 1.54% | 28.8x | 6/9 |
| 4 | WELL | Welltower Inc Real Estate | 1.54% | 116.4x | 7/9 |
| 5 | CB | Chubb Ltd Financial Services | 1.52% | 12.2x | 6/9 |
| 6 | CSCO | Cisco Systems Inc Technology | 1.50% | 36.5x | 8/9 |
| 7 | SO | Southern Co Utilities | 1.48% | 24.6x | 4/9 |
| 8 | DUK | Duke Energy Corp Utilities | 1.48% | 19.4x | 7/9 |
| 9 | BRK-B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc Class B | 1.46% | 14.7x | 4/9 |
| 10 | WM | Waste Management Inc Industrials | 1.38% | 35.1x | 8/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how USMV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-07-19
10 holdings · 15.2% tracked weight2026-07-18
10 holdings · 15.2% tracked weight2026-07-17
10 holdings · 15.2% tracked weight2026-07-16
10 holdings · 15.2% tracked weight2026-07-15
10 holdings · 15.2% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove USMV Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How USMV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.