ETF · Broad Market

VAW(VAW)

$234.60
-1.39%
Expense Ratio
$4.4B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
97.7%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio is heavily skewed towards basic materials, with an 81% allocation to this sector. This concentration in commodities-driven industries suggests that the fund's performance may be closely tied to global economic growth and inflation trends. Geographically, it's unclear from the provided data where these holdings are domiciled, but the sector tilt implies a potential bias towards emerging markets or regions with significant commodity production.

The top holdings reveal a notable single-stock dominance by Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) at 5.3%, which may amplify sector-specific risks. The portfolio's valuation posture is slightly above market average, as reflected in its weighted P/E and P/B multiples of 24.4x and 4.22x, respectively. A favorable macro environment for this portfolio would likely involve sustained economic growth, rising commodity prices, or a shift towards more inflationary monetary policy. Conversely, a prolonged period of low commodity prices or recessionary pressures could be detrimental to the fund's performance.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-06-12 09:20:34.523942+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100

The investment theme implied by the VAW ticker and its market positioning is a high degree of alignment with the actual portfolio composition, which is overwhelmingly concentrated in the Basic Materials sector. The top holdings consist almost exclusively of companies operating within this specific industry, including major producers like LIN, NEM, and FCX, demonstrating that the fund's assets directly reflect its stated thematic focus without significant diversion into unrelated sectors. There are no apparent outliers among the largest positions that would suggest a reliance on broad-market mega-cap names solely for stability rather than thematic relevance; instead, every top holding is intrinsically tied to materials production or distribution. This consistency indicates that the fund maintains a coherent strategy centered on this specific industry vertical rather than diluting its exposure with non-materials assets.

Sector coherence remains exceptionally strong, as Basic Materials accounts for over eighty percent of the total portfolio weight, leaving minimal room for drift into other areas such as Consumer Cyclical or Healthcare holdings. The concentration risk is notable due to a top-ten holding ratio exceeding fifty-five percent and the dominance of individual names within the sector breakdown, meaning performance will be heavily driven by the fortunes of these specific material producers rather than broad market trends. While this structure offers clear differentiation from a diversified broad-market index through its intense industry specialization, it also creates a scenario where volatility in the materials complex directly impacts the entire fund's trajectory without significant buffering from other sectors. The data suggests a pure-play approach that successfully executes on its thematic mandate while exposing investors to specific risks inherent to concentrated industrial exposure.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-14 03:58:47.491648+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of VAW presents an extreme concentration within the Basic Materials industry, which accounts for 81.0% of total assets across forty-five holdings. This overwhelming weighting suggests a singular investment thesis focused entirely on commodity exposure rather than broad industrial diversification. The remaining sectors, including Consumer Cyclical and Healthcare, represent negligible fractions at 7.2% and 0.5% respectively, indicating that the fund does not seek to hedge against sector-specific downturns through traditional rotation or balance strategies. Instead, the portfolio structure implies a deliberate bet on cyclical commodity prices, where performance will be almost exclusively driven by fluctuations in raw material markets rather than broader economic indicators affecting consumer spending or biotechnology innovation.

This heavy reliance on Basic Materials creates significant concentration risk, further amplified by the top-10 holdings representing 55.7% of the portfolio's value. The dominance of specific names like LIN and NEM within this single sector means that idiosyncratic events affecting major mining or chemical companies could disproportionately impact overall fund performance. While the inclusion of a small number of Consumer Cyclical and Industrials holdings provides nominal diversification, their minimal weightings render them insufficient to mitigate volatility stemming from the primary allocation. Consequently, the factor tilt is heavily skewed toward value and momentum characteristics often associated with cyclical commodity stocks, while exposure to defensive factors or growth drivers in other industries remains virtually non-existent. The fund's design effectively functions as a leveraged proxy for specific material sub-sectors rather than a diversified play on the broader materials complex.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 13:18:34.446031+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share VAW's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of VAW's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPTMSPTM$12B7693.6%
ONEOONEO$25M4484.2%
QUSQUS$1B2879.0%
VONEVONE$10B2677.3%
VONVVONV$18B3076.8%

94% of VAW's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM, which commands 3× more assets under management. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VAW's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVAW's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

25.0x
Weighted P/E
4.32x
Weighted P/B
$75B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 88% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000464
Well Diversified
Top 5: 37.7%Top 10: 54.8%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Basic Materials81.1%Other10.5%Consumer Cyclical7.3%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
99% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
Elevated

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
9%
0–3 Weak
68%
4–6 Average
22%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
71%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
TTM Yield
Stretched
Dividend Durability
71% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside VAW collectively pay out 71% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 76% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+24.0%
ETF 1Y Return
-6.6%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+30.7%
Multiple Expansion
P/E Inflation

VAW is up 24.0% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is -6.6%. The remaining +30.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 93% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of VAW's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

43% Creators
57% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)40.3%
Value Destroyers53.0%

Of VAW's analyzed weight, 43% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 57% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 93% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Concentration Risk Monitor

HIGH
14.8%
Largest Holding
LIN
28.5%
Top 3 Weight
22
Effective # of Stocks
47%
Top Stock Var. Share
Portfolio weight concentration
LIN
NEM
FCX
Other 45 stocks

LIN at 14.8% contributes an estimated 47% of portfolio variance.VAW holds 50 stocks but behaves like an 22-stock portfolio due to weight concentration in the top holdings.

Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

39/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership11.6%
Most Crowded HoldingPKG (18.0%)
Least CrowdedKNF (2.5%)
Coverage94% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

VAW has a Passive Crowding Score of 39/100. On average, 11.6% of the market capitalization of VAW's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 20 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration54.8%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1LIN
Linde plc
Basic Materials
14.81%
34.7x5/9
2NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corp.
Basic Materials
7.61%
13.0x9/9
3FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc.
Basic Materials
6.06%
36.2x6/9
4CRH
CRH plc
Basic Materials
4.68%
19.8x6/9
5SHW
Sherwin-Williams Co.
Basic Materials
4.58%
30.5x6/9
6ECL
Ecolab Inc.
Basic Materials
4.18%
36.0x5/9
7APD
Air Products & Chemicals Inc.
Basic Materials
3.62%
29.7x3/9
8NUE
Nucor Corp.
Basic Materials
3.56%
26.4x5/9
9CTVA
Corteva Inc.
Basic Materials
3.37%
41.2x7/9
10VMC
Vulcan Materials Co.
Basic Materials
2.37%
33.9x9/9
11STLD
Steel Dynamics Inc.
Basic Materials
2.30%
30.3x4/9
12MLM
Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
Basic Materials
2.25%
36.2x8/9
13AMRZ
Amrize Ltd.
Basic Materials
1.74%
25.0x4/9
14PPG
PPG Industries Inc.
Basic Materials
1.62%
17.1x6/9
15DOW
Dow Inc.
Basic Materials
1.56%
3/9
The bottom 97 stocks in VAW account for only 35.7% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 112.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how VAW’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-06-17

15 holdings · 64.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN14.81%1,352,168$673.0M
2NEM7.61%3,151,199$346.0M
3FCX6.06%4,193,693$275.6M
4CRH4.68%1,953,279$212.5M
5SHW4.58%685,706$208.3M
6ECL4.18%741,694$189.9M
7APD3.62%590,218$164.4M
8NUE3.56%648,021$162.0M
9CTVA3.37%1,959,002$153.4M
10VMC2.37%380,682$107.7M
11STLD2.30%401,622$104.5M
12MLM2.25%175,824$102.3M
13AMRZ1.74%1,452,483$79.0M
14PPG1.62%653,036$73.8M
15DOW1.56%2,099,827$70.9M

2026-06-16

15 holdings · 64.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN14.81%1,352,168$673.0M
2NEM7.61%3,151,199$346.0M
3FCX6.06%4,193,693$275.6M
4CRH4.68%1,953,279$212.5M
5SHW4.58%685,706$208.3M
6ECL4.18%741,694$189.9M
7APD3.62%590,218$164.4M
8NUE3.56%648,021$162.0M
9CTVA3.37%1,959,002$153.4M
10VMC2.37%380,682$107.7M
11STLD2.30%401,622$104.5M
12MLM2.25%175,824$102.3M
13AMRZ1.74%1,452,483$79.0M
14PPG1.62%653,036$73.8M
15DOW1.56%2,099,827$70.9M

2026-06-15

15 holdings · 64.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN14.81%1,352,168$673.0M
2NEM7.61%3,151,199$346.0M
3FCX6.06%4,193,693$275.6M
4CRH4.68%1,953,279$212.5M
5SHW4.58%685,706$208.3M
6ECL4.18%741,694$189.9M
7APD3.62%590,218$164.4M
8NUE3.56%648,021$162.0M
9CTVA3.37%1,959,002$153.4M
10VMC2.37%380,682$107.7M
11STLD2.30%401,622$104.5M
12MLM2.25%175,824$102.3M
13AMRZ1.74%1,452,483$79.0M
14PPG1.62%653,036$73.8M
15DOW1.56%2,099,827$70.9M

2026-06-14

15 holdings · 65.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN14.98%1,359,866$681.5M
2NEM7.76%3,178,017$353.0M
3FCX5.31%4,181,769$241.6M
4CRH5.08%1,951,986$231.2M
5SHW4.85%685,828$220.6M
6ECL4.25%742,364$193.5M
7APD4.10%621,239$186.4M
8CTVA3.50%1,967,892$159.4M
9NUE3.30%666,491$150.2M
10VMC2.55%384,797$116.1M
11MLM2.39%175,629$108.7M
12STLD2.03%404,024$92.4M
13DOW1.84%2,069,920$83.8M
14AMRZ1.71%1,449,634$78.0M
15PPG1.56%653,504$70.9M

2026-06-13

15 holdings · 65.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN14.98%1,359,866$681.5M
2NEM7.76%3,178,017$353.0M
3FCX5.31%4,181,769$241.6M
4CRH5.08%1,951,986$231.2M
5SHW4.85%685,828$220.6M
6ECL4.25%742,364$193.5M
7APD4.10%621,239$186.4M
8CTVA3.50%1,967,892$159.4M
9NUE3.30%666,491$150.2M
10VMC2.55%384,797$116.1M
11MLM2.39%175,629$108.7M
12STLD2.03%404,024$92.4M
13DOW1.84%2,069,920$83.8M
14AMRZ1.71%1,449,634$78.0M
15PPG1.56%653,504$70.9M

2026-06-12

15 holdings · 65.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN14.98%1,359,866$681.5M
2NEM7.76%3,178,017$353.0M
3FCX5.31%4,181,769$241.6M
4CRH5.08%1,951,986$231.2M
5SHW4.85%685,828$220.6M
6ECL4.25%742,364$193.5M
7APD4.10%621,239$186.4M
8CTVA3.50%1,967,892$159.4M
9NUE3.30%666,491$150.2M
10VMC2.55%384,797$116.1M
11MLM2.39%175,629$108.7M
12STLD2.03%404,024$92.4M
13DOW1.84%2,069,920$83.8M
14AMRZ1.71%1,449,634$78.0M
15PPG1.56%653,504$70.9M

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

19.6%
Annual Volatility
1.06
Sharpe (1Y)
0.49
Sharpe (3Y)
-23.2%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-25.5%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove VAW Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:-1.39%(2026-06-17)

Top Contributors

+0.190%
+0.139%
+0.082%

Top Detractors

-0.027%
-0.032%
-0.094%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How VAW’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-06-1762 snapshots
Basic Materials81.1%
Other10.5%
Consumer Cyclical7.3%
Industrials0.6%
Healthcare0.5%
Change since 2026-03-30
Consumer Cyclical
-1.4%
Basic Materials
+0.9%
Other
+0.6%
Healthcare
-0.1%
2026-03-302026-06-17

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.