VIGI(VIGI)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is notably skewed towards Other, which comprises nearly three-quarters of its holdings. This suggests that VIGI has a significant exposure to mid-cap or smaller companies in various industries. In contrast, its allocations to more traditional sectors such as Financial Services and Industrials are relatively limited.
Notably, the top holdings are concentrated in Canadian banks (RY, TD) and other financial institutions (NESN), which is consistent with the sector allocation. The presence of energy stocks like SU and 8306 adds some diversification, but the overall sector mix remains more defensive than aggressive. A stable economic environment with low interest rates would likely be beneficial for this portfolio's holdings, while a recession or sharp increase in interest rates could pose challenges.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-06-12 08:58:49.627139+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 15/100The investment theme implied by the ticker VIGI, typically associated with a specific value or growth strategy within the Canadian market, appears significantly misaligned with the actual composition of its top holdings. While the fund name suggests a focused thematic approach, the portfolio is dominated by broad financial services giants like RY and TD alongside energy majors such as SU, which are often considered defensive staples rather than drivers of a singular innovation or cyclical theme. Several significant positions lack clear sector classifications in the provided data, creating ambiguity about their specific industries and further obscuring any coherent narrative tied to the fund's name. The presence of these large-cap utility-like stocks suggests the portfolio may be relying on established market leaders for stability rather than maintaining a strict adherence to a specialized investment thesis.
Sector coherence is notably weak given that Financial Services alone accounts for 12% of assets, yet this sector does not appear to define a unique value proposition distinct from a broad index exposure. The distribution across Energy and Technology remains thin relative to the heavy weighting in financials, indicating a lack of diversification into the sectors where thematic funds usually seek alpha generation. With top-ten concentration sitting at 32.9%, the fund exhibits moderate reliance on its largest names, but this is compounded by an industry spread that mirrors general market breadth rather than a concentrated bet on a specific trend. The data reveals a structure that functions more like a diversified core holding or a broad-based index proxy than a sharply defined thematic vehicle, leaving investors with limited differentiation from standard market benchmarks based solely on the provided holdings and sector weights.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 02:48:12.779449+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation profile of VIGI presents a distinct divergence from the fund's likely underlying mandate, as Financial Services dominates exposure at 12.0% while Technology and Industrials remain minimal at 3.5% and 0.9%, respectively. This distribution suggests an investment thesis heavily weighted toward Canadian financial institutions rather than broad market growth or cyclical industrial expansion. The presence of significant holdings in non-standard sectors, such as Energy at 4.2% and the inclusion of entities like NESN and 8306 which lack standard sector classifications within the top five positions, indicates that specific stock selection drives performance more than traditional industry categorization. Consequently, the fund's risk profile appears concentrated around regulatory changes affecting banking and insurance sectors rather than broader macroeconomic trends impacting technology or manufacturing industries.
Concentration risk is notably elevated given that the top ten holdings account for 32.9% of assets, with RY alone representing over four percent of total exposure. This high degree of concentration implies that idiosyncratic events affecting a single major financial entity could disproportionately influence overall portfolio volatility compared to more diversified peers. The limited representation in Technology and Real Estate further underscores a defensive or value-oriented tilt toward established service providers rather than exposure to innovation-driven growth stocks or inflation-sensitive assets. By maintaining such low allocations across most non-financial sectors, the fund effectively isolates itself from potential downturns in those areas but simultaneously forfeits participation in their upside trajectories.
Ultimately, this allocation structure reveals a strategy focused on capturing returns within specific segments of the Canadian financial landscape while accepting higher concentration risk to achieve that objective. The data reflects a deliberate choice to prioritize stability and dividends inherent to large-cap banks over sector diversification or exposure to emerging industries. Investors evaluating this vehicle must weigh whether this narrow focus aligns with their desire for concentrated income generation from financial services versus a preference for balanced multi-sector equity exposure.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 02:06:09.781292+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share VIGI's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of VIGI's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPDWSPDW | $36B | — | 195 | 85.6% |
| VEAVanguard FTSE Developed Markets Index Fund ETF Shares | $290B | — | 79 | 79.4% |
| VEUVEU | $86B | — | 68 | 78.9% |
| VXUSVXUS | $624B | — | 68 | 78.9% |
| CWICWI | $2B | — | 91 | 77.6% |
86% of VIGI's portfolio by weight is also held by SPDW, which commands 4× more assets under management. When SPDW receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VIGI's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVIGI's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 26% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 28% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside VIGI collectively pay out 34% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 18% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryVIGI is up 6.9% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +43.4%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 36.5% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 23% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of VIGI's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of VIGI's analyzed weight, 31% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 69% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 14% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
SEVEREHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
VIGI has a Passive Crowding Score of 100/100. On average, 111.1% of the market capitalization of VIGI's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. In the event of a broad sell-off, VIGI faces elevated "gap-down" risk — as passive redemptions force simultaneous selling of constituents where a large portion of the float is not actively trading.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 10 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RY | Royal Bank of Canada Financial Services | 4.47% | 18.1x | 3/9 |
| 2 | 8306 | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc. | 3.94% | — | — |
| 3 | NESN | Nestle SA | 3.80% | — | — |
| 4 | NOVN | Novartis AG | 3.55% | — | — |
| 5 | TD | Toronto-Dominion Bank Financial Services | 3.40% | 19.2x | 4/9 |
| 6 | ROP | Roche Holding AG Technology | 3.39% | 20.9x | 5/9 |
| 7 | SU | Schneider Electric SE Energy | 3.01% | 16.3x | 7/9 |
| 8 | 6501 | Hitachi Ltd. | 2.62% | — | — |
| 9 | NOVO B | Novo Nordisk A/S Class B | 2.57% | — | — |
| 10 | IBE | Iberdrola SA | 2.50% | — | — |
| 11 | 8316 | Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc. | 2.49% | — | — |
| 12 | 6758 | Sony Group Corp. | 2.35% | — | — |
| 13 | 8058 | Mitsubishi Corp. | 2.25% | — | — |
| 14 | 6981 | Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd. | 2.05% | — | — |
| 15 | 1299 | AIA Group Ltd. | 1.95% | — | — |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how VIGI’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-06-16
15 holdings · 44.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RY | 4.47% | 2,149,915 | $412.4M |
| 2 | 8306 | 3.94% | 19,347,900 | $363.6M |
| 3 | NESN | 3.80% | 3,450,457 | $350.1M |
| 4 | NOVN | 3.55% | 2,178,039 | $327.6M |
| 5 | TD | 3.40% | 2,736,243 | $313.1M |
| 6 | ROP | 3.39% | 743,196 | $312.7M |
| 7 | SU | 3.01% | 882,220 | $277.1M |
| 8 | 6501 | 2.62% | 7,469,700 | $241.8M |
| 9 | NOVO B | 2.57% | 5,193,156 | $237.3M |
| 10 | IBE | 2.50% | 10,140,737 | $230.2M |
| 11 | 8316 | 2.49% | 6,287,000 | $229.3M |
| 12 | 6758 | 2.35% | 10,027,100 | $216.3M |
| 13 | 8058 | 2.25% | 6,568,300 | $207.7M |
| 14 | 6981 | 2.05% | 3,007,500 | $189.4M |
| 15 | 1299 | 1.95% | 17,121,360 | $179.6M |
2026-06-15
15 holdings · 44.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RY | 4.47% | 2,149,915 | $412.4M |
| 2 | 8306 | 3.94% | 19,347,900 | $363.6M |
| 3 | NESN | 3.80% | 3,450,457 | $350.1M |
| 4 | NOVN | 3.55% | 2,178,039 | $327.6M |
| 5 | TD | 3.40% | 2,736,243 | $313.1M |
| 6 | ROP | 3.39% | 743,196 | $312.7M |
| 7 | SU | 3.01% | 882,220 | $277.1M |
| 8 | 6501 | 2.62% | 7,469,700 | $241.8M |
| 9 | NOVO B | 2.57% | 5,193,156 | $237.3M |
| 10 | IBE | 2.50% | 10,140,737 | $230.2M |
| 11 | 8316 | 2.49% | 6,287,000 | $229.3M |
| 12 | 6758 | 2.35% | 10,027,100 | $216.3M |
| 13 | 8058 | 2.25% | 6,568,300 | $207.7M |
| 14 | 6981 | 2.05% | 3,007,500 | $189.4M |
| 15 | 1299 | 1.95% | 17,121,360 | $179.6M |
2026-06-14
15 holdings · 43.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RY | 4.26% | 2,171,740 | $390.6M |
| 2 | NESN | 3.85% | 3,486,734 | $353.0M |
| 3 | 8306 | 3.83% | 19,544,500 | $351.1M |
| 4 | NOVN | 3.55% | 2,200,924 | $325.3M |
| 5 | ROP | 3.34% | 751,053 | $306.1M |
| 6 | TD | 3.25% | 2,763,736 | $297.7M |
| 7 | SU | 3.10% | 891,598 | $283.7M |
| 8 | IBE | 2.62% | 10,248,689 | $240.3M |
| 9 | 6501 | 2.62% | 7,547,300 | $240.0M |
| 10 | 8316 | 2.45% | 6,350,600 | $224.2M |
| 11 | NOVO B | 2.44% | 5,247,571 | $223.2M |
| 12 | 8058 | 2.32% | 6,634,000 | $212.5M |
| 13 | 6758 | 2.21% | 10,128,000 | $202.9M |
| 14 | 1299 | 2.07% | 17,302,560 | $190.0M |
| 15 | CM | 1.86% | 1,529,075 | $170.6M |
2026-06-13
15 holdings · 43.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RY | 4.26% | 2,171,740 | $390.6M |
| 2 | NESN | 3.85% | 3,486,734 | $353.0M |
| 3 | 8306 | 3.83% | 19,544,500 | $351.1M |
| 4 | NOVN | 3.55% | 2,200,924 | $325.3M |
| 5 | ROP | 3.34% | 751,053 | $306.1M |
| 6 | TD | 3.25% | 2,763,736 | $297.7M |
| 7 | SU | 3.10% | 891,598 | $283.7M |
| 8 | IBE | 2.62% | 10,248,689 | $240.3M |
| 9 | 6501 | 2.62% | 7,547,300 | $240.0M |
| 10 | 8316 | 2.45% | 6,350,600 | $224.2M |
| 11 | NOVO B | 2.44% | 5,247,571 | $223.2M |
| 12 | 8058 | 2.32% | 6,634,000 | $212.5M |
| 13 | 6758 | 2.21% | 10,128,000 | $202.9M |
| 14 | 1299 | 2.07% | 17,302,560 | $190.0M |
| 15 | CM | 1.86% | 1,529,075 | $170.6M |
2026-06-12
15 holdings · 43.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RY | 4.26% | 2,171,740 | $390.6M |
| 2 | NESN | 3.85% | 3,486,734 | $353.0M |
| 3 | 8306 | 3.83% | 19,544,500 | $351.1M |
| 4 | NOVN | 3.55% | 2,200,924 | $325.3M |
| 5 | ROP | 3.34% | 751,053 | $306.1M |
| 6 | TD | 3.25% | 2,763,736 | $297.7M |
| 7 | SU | 3.10% | 891,598 | $283.7M |
| 8 | IBE | 2.62% | 10,248,689 | $240.3M |
| 9 | 6501 | 2.62% | 7,547,300 | $240.0M |
| 10 | 8316 | 2.45% | 6,350,600 | $224.2M |
| 11 | NOVO B | 2.44% | 5,247,571 | $223.2M |
| 12 | 8058 | 2.32% | 6,634,000 | $212.5M |
| 13 | 6758 | 2.21% | 10,128,000 | $202.9M |
| 14 | 1299 | 2.07% | 17,302,560 | $190.0M |
| 15 | CM | 1.86% | 1,529,075 | $170.6M |
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 43.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RY | 4.26% | 2,171,740 | $390.6M |
| 2 | NESN | 3.85% | 3,486,734 | $353.0M |
| 3 | 8306 | 3.83% | 19,544,500 | $351.1M |
| 4 | NOVN | 3.55% | 2,200,924 | $325.3M |
| 5 | ROP | 3.34% | 751,053 | $306.1M |
| 6 | TD | 3.25% | 2,763,736 | $297.7M |
| 7 | SU | 3.10% | 891,598 | $283.7M |
| 8 | 6501 | 2.62% | 7,547,300 | $240.0M |
| 9 | IBE | 2.62% | 10,248,689 | $240.3M |
| 10 | 8316 | 2.45% | 6,350,600 | $224.2M |
| 11 | NOVO B | 2.44% | 5,247,571 | $223.2M |
| 12 | 8058 | 2.32% | 6,634,000 | $212.5M |
| 13 | 6758 | 2.21% | 10,128,000 | $202.9M |
| 14 | 1299 | 2.07% | 17,302,560 | $190.0M |
| 15 | CM | 1.86% | 1,529,075 | $170.6M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove VIGI Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How VIGI’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-15.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.