VTWO(VTWO)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is predominantly skewed towards Other, which encompasses a broad range of industries not explicitly listed in the provided data. This suggests that the fund may be tracking a diversified benchmark or attempting to capture market returns through broad exposure. The Technology and Industrials sectors are also represented, albeit to a lesser extent.
The top holdings reveal a relatively concentrated portfolio, with BE being the largest single holding at 1.8%. Other notable positions include CRDO and STRL, each representing around 1% of assets. The weighted P/E ratio of 22.1x indicates that the fund is positioned in growth-oriented stocks, while the lower weighted P/B ratio suggests a valuation posture that may be more attractive to investors seeking value opportunities.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 08:22:51.427379+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100The thematic alignment between the VTWO name and its underlying portfolio reveals a significant divergence from typical small-cap or mid-cap growth expectations, as evidenced by the heavy weighting of established industrials and technology firms. While the fund's title suggests a focus on emerging smaller companies, the top holdings include major entities like Boeing (BE) and CDE, which are often perceived as large or mega-cap leaders within their respective sectors rather than niche small-caps. This composition indicates that the fund may be utilizing broad-based industry names to anchor its strategy, potentially prioritizing stability through familiar market players over strict adherence to a "small" capitalization theme. The presence of companies with unclear classification tags in multiple top positions further complicates the clarity of the investment thesis relative to traditional small-cap definitions.
Sector coherence remains present but is diluted by the sheer breadth of exposure across twelve distinct sectors, raising questions about whether the fund offers genuine differentiation from a broad market index. Although Technology and Industrials serve as the primary pillars with roughly equal weightings at 5.4% and 5.3%, the inclusion of substantial positions in healthcare, financial services, real estate, and energy suggests a generalized approach rather than a concentrated thematic bet on specific small-cap growth drivers. The low top-10 concentration of just 6.8% confirms that no single stock dominates, yet this dispersion mirrors the structure of a wide-market index more closely than a specialized thematic vehicle would typically exhibit. Consequently, while the portfolio avoids extreme idiosyncratic risk through diversification, its sector spread and reliance on recognizable industry leaders may undermine claims of unique small-cap exposure for investors seeking specific niche opportunities.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 02:01:36.596286+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation for VTWO presents a distinctively narrow exposure profile compared to broad market indices, with the top three sectors—Technology, Industrials, and Healthcare—collectively accounting for less than 15% of total assets. This distribution reveals an investment thesis heavily skewed toward small-cap equities rather than large-cap dominance, as evidenced by the minimal representation in traditional growth drivers like Communication Services (0.7%) or Consumer Defensive (0.5%). The fund's construction emphasizes specific sub-sectors within Industrials and Technology through its top holdings, such as BE and CRDO, suggesting a deliberate focus on niche market leaders rather than diversified industry beta. This approach implies the underlying strategy targets companies with significant growth potential relative to their size, accepting lower liquidity in exchange for higher idiosyncratic returns.
Concentration risk appears elevated due to the limited number of holdings per sector; for instance, Technology and Industrials each contain fewer than 30 positions despite representing substantial portions of the portfolio. The Top-10 concentration metric of 6.8% indicates that a small fraction of the total universe drives nearly seven percent of the fund's performance, highlighting potential vulnerability to stock-specific volatility rather than systemic sector shifts. While the allocation across Basic Materials and Energy remains modest at under 2.5%, the heavy weighting in Industrials suggests an implicit bet on capital expenditure cycles or infrastructure-related growth themes prevalent in smaller enterprises. This structural setup differentiates VTWO from core equity funds by prioritizing depth within specific small-cap niches over broad diversification, potentially resulting in higher variance during market rotations that favor large-cap value or defensive sectors.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 15:25:57.674288+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share VTWO's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of VTWO's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 357 | 48.1% |
| SPSMSPSM | $14B | — | 281 | 35.4% |
| VXFVXF | $84B | — | 129 | 27.1% |
| VBKVBK | $40B | — | 171 | 25.9% |
| SLYGSLYG | $4B | — | 193 | 25.7% |
48% of VTWO's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VTWO's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVTWO's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 50% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 37% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside VTWO collectively pay out 38% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 11% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryVTWO is up 33.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +14.7%. The remaining +19.0% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 34% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of VTWO's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of VTWO's analyzed weight, 34% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 66% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 16% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
VTWO has a Passive Crowding Score of 31/100. On average, 9.3% of the market capitalization of VTWO's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 11 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOG.A | Moog Inc. Class A | 0.37% | 43.3x | — |
| 2 | HUT | Hut 8 Corp. | 0.36% | — | — |
| 3 | BTSG | BrightSpring Health Services Inc. Healthcare | 0.35% | 87.0x | 7/9 |
| 4 | VSAT | ViaSat Inc. | 0.35% | — | 6/9 |
| 5 | MXL | MaxLinear Inc. | 0.34% | — | — |
| 6 | CYTK | Cytokinetics Inc. Healthcare | 0.34% | — | — |
| 7 | AGX | Argan Inc. Industrials | 0.33% | 54.9x | 6/9 |
| 8 | UMBF | UMB Financial Corp. | 0.32% | 13.0x | 6/9 |
| 9 | RIOT | Riot Blockchain Inc. | 0.30% | — | — |
| 10 | FROG | JFrog Ltd. | 0.30% | — | — |
| 11 | KRYS | Krystal Biotech Inc. | 0.29% | 36.0x | 7/9 |
| 12 | ESE | ESCO Technologies Inc. Technology | 0.28% | 57.1x | 3/9 |
| 13 | CTRE | CareTrust REIT Inc. Real Estate | 0.28% | 26.6x | 6/9 |
| 14 | FCFS | FirstCash Holdings Inc. | 0.27% | 25.6x | 7/9 |
| 15 | QBTS | D-Wave Quantum Inc. | 0.27% | — | — |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how VTWO’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-07-19
15 holdings · 4.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOG.A | 0.37% | 164,919 | $69.9M |
| 2 | HUT | 0.36% | 594,695 | $68.7M |
| 3 | VSAT | 0.35% | 731,305 | $65.7M |
| 4 | BTSG | 0.35% | 939,425 | $65.5M |
| 5 | MXL | 0.34% | 498,636 | $63.8M |
| 6 | CYTK | 0.34% | 761,130 | $64.8M |
| 7 | AGX | 0.33% | 79,184 | $63.2M |
| 8 | UMBF | 0.32% | 424,997 | $60.7M |
| 9 | FROG | 0.30% | 628,431 | $57.1M |
| 10 | RIOT | 0.30% | 2,055,193 | $56.3M |
| 11 | KRYS | 0.29% | 150,403 | $55.9M |
| 12 | CTRE | 0.28% | 1,308,348 | $52.8M |
| 13 | ESE | 0.28% | 152,536 | $53.4M |
| 14 | FCFS | 0.27% | 237,207 | $51.3M |
| 15 | ONB | 0.27% | 2,010,679 | $52.1M |
2026-07-18
15 holdings · 4.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOG.A | 0.37% | 164,919 | $69.9M |
| 2 | HUT | 0.36% | 594,695 | $68.7M |
| 3 | VSAT | 0.35% | 731,305 | $65.7M |
| 4 | BTSG | 0.35% | 939,425 | $65.5M |
| 5 | MXL | 0.34% | 498,636 | $63.8M |
| 6 | CYTK | 0.34% | 761,130 | $64.8M |
| 7 | AGX | 0.33% | 79,184 | $63.2M |
| 8 | UMBF | 0.32% | 424,997 | $60.7M |
| 9 | FROG | 0.30% | 628,431 | $57.1M |
| 10 | RIOT | 0.30% | 2,055,193 | $56.3M |
| 11 | KRYS | 0.29% | 150,403 | $55.9M |
| 12 | ESE | 0.28% | 152,536 | $53.4M |
| 13 | CTRE | 0.28% | 1,308,348 | $52.8M |
| 14 | ALKS | 0.27% | 965,009 | $50.6M |
| 15 | COMP | 0.27% | 4,138,596 | $51.0M |
2026-07-17
15 holdings · 4.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOG.A | 0.37% | 164,919 | $69.9M |
| 2 | HUT | 0.36% | 594,695 | $68.7M |
| 3 | BTSG | 0.35% | 939,425 | $65.5M |
| 4 | VSAT | 0.35% | 731,305 | $65.7M |
| 5 | CYTK | 0.34% | 761,130 | $64.8M |
| 6 | MXL | 0.34% | 498,636 | $63.8M |
| 7 | AGX | 0.33% | 79,184 | $63.2M |
| 8 | UMBF | 0.32% | 424,997 | $60.7M |
| 9 | RIOT | 0.30% | 2,055,193 | $56.3M |
| 10 | FROG | 0.30% | 628,431 | $57.1M |
| 11 | KRYS | 0.29% | 150,403 | $55.9M |
| 12 | CTRE | 0.28% | 1,308,348 | $52.8M |
| 13 | ESE | 0.28% | 152,536 | $53.4M |
| 14 | ONB | 0.27% | 2,010,679 | $52.1M |
| 15 | ALKS | 0.27% | 965,009 | $50.6M |
2026-07-16
15 holdings · 4.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MOG.A | 0.37% | 164,919 | $69.9M |
| 2 | HUT | 0.36% | 594,695 | $68.7M |
| 3 | VSAT | 0.35% | 731,305 | $65.7M |
| 4 | BTSG | 0.35% | 939,425 | $65.5M |
| 5 | MXL | 0.34% | 498,636 | $63.8M |
| 6 | CYTK | 0.34% | 761,130 | $64.8M |
| 7 | AGX | 0.33% | 79,184 | $63.2M |
| 8 | UMBF | 0.32% | 424,997 | $60.7M |
| 9 | RIOT | 0.30% | 2,055,193 | $56.3M |
| 10 | FROG | 0.30% | 628,431 | $57.1M |
| 11 | KRYS | 0.29% | 150,403 | $55.9M |
| 12 | CTRE | 0.28% | 1,308,348 | $52.8M |
| 13 | ESE | 0.28% | 152,536 | $53.4M |
| 14 | QBTS | 0.27% | 2,126,191 | $51.0M |
| 15 | FCFS | 0.27% | 237,207 | $51.3M |
2026-07-15
15 holdings · 9.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | 1.79% | 1,124,884 | $320.6M |
| 2 | CRDO | 1.09% | 830,686 | $196.1M |
| 3 | STRL | 0.74% | 153,492 | $132.1M |
| 4 | FN | 0.68% | 185,880 | $121.6M |
| 5 | NXT | 0.65% | 750,737 | $117.4M |
| 6 | IONQ | 0.61% | 1,525,344 | $109.9M |
| 7 | CDE | 0.57% | 5,256,631 | $101.6M |
| 8 | TTMI | 0.51% | 526,689 | $91.5M |
| 9 | SATS | 0.50% | 697,674 | $90.1M |
| 10 | GH | 0.46% | 638,779 | $82.8M |
| 11 | SITM | 0.46% | 115,819 | $82.3M |
| 12 | RMBS | 0.45% | 555,197 | $80.8M |
| 13 | DY | 0.43% | 150,189 | $76.6M |
| 14 | MOD | 0.42% | 269,644 | $75.2M |
| 15 | SMTC | 0.41% | 479,176 | $73.1M |
2026-07-14
15 holdings · 9.8% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BE | 1.79% | 1,124,884 | $320.6M |
| 2 | CRDO | 1.09% | 830,686 | $196.1M |
| 3 | STRL | 0.74% | 153,492 | $132.1M |
| 4 | FN | 0.68% | 185,880 | $121.6M |
| 5 | NXT | 0.65% | 750,737 | $117.4M |
| 6 | IONQ | 0.61% | 1,525,344 | $109.9M |
| 7 | CDE | 0.57% | 5,256,631 | $101.6M |
| 8 | TTMI | 0.51% | 526,689 | $91.5M |
| 9 | SATS | 0.50% | 697,674 | $90.1M |
| 10 | GH | 0.46% | 638,779 | $82.8M |
| 11 | SITM | 0.46% | 115,819 | $82.3M |
| 12 | RMBS | 0.45% | 555,197 | $80.8M |
| 13 | DY | 0.43% | 150,189 | $76.6M |
| 14 | MOD | 0.42% | 269,644 | $75.2M |
| 15 | SMTC | 0.41% | 479,176 | $73.1M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove VTWO Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How VTWO’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.