ETF · Broad Market

XBI(XBI)

$140.72
+0.95%
Expense Ratio
$7.4B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
98.3%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards other sectors, with only a modest weighting to healthcare, its stated objective. This unusual tilt may indicate a more nuanced investment strategy than simply tracking a broad biotech index. The weighted P/E and P/B ratios suggest that the fund holds a mix of growth-oriented and value-focused stocks within its healthcare allocation.

The top holdings are concentrated in smaller-cap biotechnology names, with several companies representing 2% or larger weightings in the portfolio. This concentration may increase risk if these individual stocks underperform or experience significant volatility. The sector exposure is also notable for its relative scarcity of traditional pharmaceuticals and medical device companies, instead favoring more experimental or innovative segments within healthcare. A macro environment characterized by increased research and development spending, favorable regulatory climates, or breakthroughs in specific therapeutic areas may be beneficial for this portfolio, while a downturn in biotech valuations or reduced government support could be challenging.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-06-20 08:56:14.16277+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100

The investment theme implied by the XBI ticker is small-cap biotechnology, yet an examination of the top holdings reveals a significant concentration of companies operating within the broader healthcare sector rather than strictly in the biotech space. While several names like Alkermes and Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals align with a pharmaceutical or biotech narrative, others such as Rhythm Pharmaceuticals and Takeda Pharmaceutical lack explicit classification tags in the provided data but are known for large-scale pharma operations that often diverge from pure-play small-cap innovation. This suggests the fund may be capturing the general healthcare recovery trend through mid-to-large cap entities disguised under sector labels, potentially diluting the intended focus on micro-cap biotech innovators despite the thematic branding associated with its ticker symbol.

Sector coherence appears mixed given that Healthcare accounts for only 36.5% of assets while holding fifty-one positions, indicating a wide dispersion beyond this single theme. The top-ten concentration stands at 15.3%, which is relatively low and suggests the fund avoids heavy reliance on any single mega-cap stock to stabilize returns; however, the lack of specific sector tags for many top holdings obscures whether these are truly differentiated small caps or larger diversified firms. Consequently, while the portfolio exhibits broad exposure within healthcare rather than a tight cluster around emerging biotech therapies, it remains distinct from a total market index due to its heavy weighting in this specific industry vertical and its exclusion of other major sectors entirely.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 15:02:14.164028+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The XBI ETF demonstrates a pronounced sector concentration within Healthcare, which accounts for 36.7% of its total assets through 51 distinct holdings. This heavy weighting suggests an investment thesis heavily anchored in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical sectors rather than a broad-based healthcare exposure that might include established medical device or hospital operators. The presence of multiple top-five constituents such as RVMD, TVTX, TGTX, ALKS, and ARWR indicates a deliberate tilt toward mid-to-small-cap companies often characterized by high growth potential but also significant operational volatility. These specific names frequently operate in specialized therapeutic areas with limited product pipelines, implying the fund targets firms at various stages of clinical development or commercialization rather than large-cap incumbents with diversified revenue streams.

The top-10 concentration metric of 15.5% reveals a portfolio structure that is relatively dispersed compared to many concentrated equity strategies, yet the sheer dominance of the Healthcare sector creates inherent cross-sectional risk. Because nearly all exposures fall within one macroeconomic and regulatory regime, the fund's performance will be inextricably linked to broader industry-specific catalysts such as FDA approval cycles, pricing negotiations, or patent expirations. This lack of diversification across other economic sectors means that adverse events specific to drug development or healthcare policy could impact a substantial portion of the portfolio simultaneously. Consequently, while the allocation may offer amplified returns during periods of strong biotech sentiment, it also exposes investors to heightened idiosyncratic risks inherent in unproven asset classes and regulatory uncertainty without the cushioning effect of other economic drivers.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 17:51:29.354828+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XBI's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XBI's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VHTVHT$19B13697.7%
VFMOVFMO$1B7155.4%
VTWOVTWO$15B4248.1%
VBKVBK$40B4146.3%
VXFVXF$84B2936.6%

98% of XBI's portfolio by weight is also held by VHT, which commands 3× more assets under management. When VHT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XBI's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXBI's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

19.3x
Weighted P/E
4.40x
Weighted P/B
$12B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 26% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000102
Well Diversified
Top 5: 9.5%Top 10: 16.7%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other63.7%Healthcare36.3%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
99% Weight
Market Cap
Mid
Risk Profile
Low Risk

Caution: 45% of fund weight scores below 4 — indicating weak profitability or deteriorating fundamentals.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
45%
0–3 Weak
41%
4–6 Average
13%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+71.4%
ETF 1Y Return
-2.8%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+74.2%
Multiple Expansion
P/E Inflation

XBI is up 71.4% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is -2.8%. The remaining +74.2% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 93% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XBI's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

44% Creators
56% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)12.4%
Value Destroyers15.7%

Of XBI's analyzed weight, 44% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 56% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 28% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

34/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership10.1%
Most Crowded HoldingAMGN (17.2%)
Least CrowdedCPRX (3.7%)
Coverage36% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XBI has a Passive Crowding Score of 34/100. On average, 10.1% of the market capitalization of XBI's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 9 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration16.7%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1TGTX
TG THERAPEUTICS INC
2.03%
11.5x4/9
2TVTX
TRAVERE THERAPEUTICS INC
2.03%
3TWST
TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP
1.96%
5/9
4ALKS
ALKERMES PLC
Healthcare
1.77%
20.8x5/9
5RVMD
REVOLUTION MEDICINES INC
1.75%
6ARWR
ARROWHEAD PHARMACEUTICALS IN
Healthcare
1.54%
36.6x5/9
7KRYS
KRYSTAL BIOTECH INC
1.48%
36.0x7/9
8EXEL
EXELIXIS INC
1.39%
15.1x7/9
9BEAM
BEAM THERAPEUTICS INC
Healthcare
1.38%
3/9
10NUVL
NUVALENT INC A
1.37%
11CYTK
CYTOKINETICS INC
Healthcare
1.36%
12NBIX
NEUROCRINE BIOSCIENCES INC
1.36%
27.6x4/9
13PTCT
PTC THERAPEUTICS INC
1.32%
7.6x7/9
14VCYT
VERACYTE INC
1.31%
49.7x8/9
15APGE
APOGEE THERAPEUTICS INC
Healthcare
1.31%
The bottom 128 stocks in XBI account for only 76.6% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 143.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XBI’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-06-20

15 holdings · 23.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TGTX2.03%3,537,860
2TVTX2.03%3,353,764
3TWST1.96%2,117,888
4ALKS1.77%3,573,530
5RVMD1.75%996,530
6ARWR1.54%1,708,189
7KRYS1.48%389,266
8EXEL1.39%2,377,059
9BEAM1.38%3,805,508
10NUVL1.37%991,954
11CYTK1.36%1,559,791
12NBIX1.36%766,090
13PTCT1.32%1,511,265
14VCYT1.31%2,293,121
15APGE1.31%1,328,967

2026-06-19

15 holdings · 23.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TGTX2.03%3,537,860
2TVTX2.03%3,353,764
3TWST1.96%2,117,888
4ALKS1.77%3,573,530
5RVMD1.75%996,530
6ARWR1.54%1,708,189
7KRYS1.48%389,266
8EXEL1.39%2,377,059
9BEAM1.38%3,805,508
10NUVL1.37%991,954
11CYTK1.36%1,559,791
12NBIX1.36%766,090
13PTCT1.32%1,511,265
14VCYT1.31%2,293,121
15APGE1.31%1,328,967

2026-06-18

15 holdings · 23.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TWST2.07%2,035,388
2TVTX2.06%3,223,164
3TGTX2.05%3,400,160
4ALKS1.81%3,434,430
5RVMD1.79%957,730
6ARWR1.50%1,641,689
7KRYS1.45%374,066
8EXEL1.42%2,284,559
9NUVL1.41%953,354
10NBIX1.38%736,290
11BEAM1.36%3,657,408
12CYTK1.35%1,499,091
13VCYT1.34%2,203,821
14MDGL1.32%221,055
15PTGX1.31%988,693

2026-06-17

15 holdings · 23.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TVTX2.06%3,236,224
2TGTX2.03%3,413,930
3TWST1.95%2,043,638
4RVMD1.82%961,610
5ALKS1.81%3,448,340
6ARWR1.50%1,648,339
7KRYS1.44%375,586
8EXEL1.44%2,293,809
9NUVL1.40%957,214
10NBIX1.39%739,270
11BEAM1.35%3,672,218
12PTCT1.32%1,458,345
13PTGX1.32%992,693
14MDGL1.31%221,955
15APGE1.31%1,282,437

2026-06-16

15 holdings · 23.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TVTX2.06%3,254,508
2TGTX2.03%3,433,208
3TWST1.95%2,055,174
4RVMD1.82%967,042
5ALKS1.81%3,467,814
6ARWR1.50%1,657,649
7KRYS1.44%377,714
8EXEL1.44%2,306,759
9NUVL1.40%962,618
10NBIX1.39%743,442
11BEAM1.35%3,692,952
12PTCT1.32%1,466,577
13PTGX1.32%998,293
14MDGL1.31%223,215
15APGE1.31%1,289,675

2026-06-15

15 holdings · 23.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1TGTX1.99%3,412,553
2TVTX1.92%3,234,918
3ALKS1.88%3,446,949
4TWST1.84%2,042,799
5RVMD1.74%961,222
6EXEL1.49%2,292,884
7ARWR1.49%1,647,674
8KRYS1.47%375,434
9NBIX1.46%738,972
10NUVL1.44%956,828
11APGE1.39%1,281,920
12INCY1.32%1,011,355
13PTGX1.32%992,293
14PTCT1.32%1,457,757
15BEAM1.31%3,670,737

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

32.1%
Annual Volatility
2.02
Sharpe (1Y)
0.51
Sharpe (3Y)
-33.0%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-55.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XBI Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.95%(2026-06-18)

Top Contributors

+0.111%
+0.070%
+0.060%

Top Detractors

-0.017%
-0.021%
-0.023%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XBI’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-06-2065 snapshots
Other63.7%
Healthcare36.3%
Change since 2026-03-30
Other
+2.7%
Healthcare
-2.7%
2026-03-302026-06-20

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-18.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.