ETF · Broad Market

XHS(XHS)

$122.05
+0.99%
Expense Ratio
$82M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
98.3%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The fund's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards healthcare, with over half of its holdings concentrated in this space. This suggests that the portfolio is positioned to benefit from growth and trends within the healthcare industry. The geographic exposure and market-cap profile are not explicitly provided, but the sector mix implies a focus on developed markets, particularly the US.

The fund's valuation posture appears moderate, with a weighted P/E of 23.5x and a weighted P/B of 3.29x. Concentration risk is elevated due to the top holdings, which include several large-cap healthcare stocks such as CLOV and HUM. The sector mix diverges from the broader market, where technology and consumer staples tend to dominate. A favorable macro environment for this portfolio would likely involve sustained growth in the healthcare industry, while a downturn in the sector or an increase in interest rates could be unfavorable.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-06-20 10:05:17.97416+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100

The XHS ETF demonstrates a strong thematic alignment with its healthcare focus, as the vast majority of top holdings are explicitly categorized within that sector. Holdings such as UnitedHealth Group, CVS Health, and Centene Corporation represent core components of the broader healthcare ecosystem, reinforcing the fund's stated objective rather than diluting it with unrelated industries. While a small portion of positions like PGNY and MD lack specific sector tags in this data snapshot, they do not appear to deviate significantly from the medical theme given their common association with health services or technology within that domain. The portfolio avoids over-reliance on mega-cap stabilization by maintaining a diversified list of thirty holdings where no single entity dominates the top ten concentration at 26.1%, suggesting an effort to capture sector-wide trends rather than betting heavily on individual large-cap performance.

Sector coherence is further evidenced by the weight distribution, with healthcare comprising nearly fifty-eight percent of the portfolio while financial services remain a minor component at two percent. This structure indicates that the fund maintains distinct differentiation from broad market indices without relying on heavy exposure to non-healthcare sectors to balance returns. The concentration risk appears manageable given the spread across thirty holdings and the relatively low weightings in individual top positions, which reduces vulnerability to idiosyncratic stock-specific volatility. Although the total assets under management are modest at zero point one billion dollars, the internal composition reflects a disciplined adherence to sector boundaries. Investors may observe that this approach provides exposure to healthcare dynamics without the dilution often seen in thematic funds forced to include unrelated sectors for diversification purposes.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 19:03:30.646975+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The fund exhibits an exceptionally high concentration within the Healthcare sector, which accounts for nearly 58% of its total assets. This overwhelming allocation suggests a clear investment thesis centered on exposure to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies rather than a diversified market approach. The presence of only one holding in Financial Services further underscores this narrow focus, indicating that the strategy prioritizes specific industry dynamics over broad economic diversification or defensive positioning across other major sectors like technology or consumer staples.

This sector-specific heavy weighting introduces significant idiosyncratic risk, as the fund's performance will be almost entirely dependent on the regulatory environment and clinical trial outcomes within healthcare. The top five holdings collectively represent a substantial portion of the portfolio, with four out of the five being Healthcare entities, reinforcing that the majority of capital is deployed into companies facing similar volatility drivers such as drug approval timelines or patent cliffs. Notably, one of the top positions falls outside the primary sector classification, yet it remains embedded within this highly concentrated framework, potentially adding a layer of complexity to the fund's risk profile without offering true diversification benefits.

The data reveals a distinct tilt toward small-to-mid-cap growth characteristics often found in biotech and medtech firms rather than large-cap stability or value factors. With nearly 30 holdings allocated almost exclusively to healthcare, the portfolio lacks the breadth required to mitigate single-stock failures within that industry. Consequently, any adverse developments specific to this sector could disproportionately impact the fund's overall returns, while positive catalysts in biotechnology would likely be amplified significantly compared to a more balanced index strategy.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 01:45:12.700908+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XHS's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XHS's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VHTVHT$19B5698.1%
SPTMSPTM$12B4276.8%
ONEOONEO$25M2036.5%
SPSMSPSM$14B2036.1%
VBKVBK$40B1732.6%

98% of XHS's portfolio by weight is also held by VHT, which commands 229× more assets under management. When VHT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XHS's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXHS's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

23.3x
Weighted P/E
3.28x
Weighted P/B
$25B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 72% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000197
Well Diversified
Top 5: 15.2%Top 10: 27.0%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Healthcare57.6%Other40.6%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
100% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
Low Risk

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
15%
0–3 Weak
60%
4–6 Average
25%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
34%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
34% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XHS collectively pay out 34% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 34% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+26.8%
ETF 1Y Return
+3.2%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+23.7%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

XHS is up 26.8% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +3.2%. The remaining +23.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 91% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XHS's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

38% Creators
62% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)15.7%
Value Destroyers25.2%

Of XHS's analyzed weight, 38% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 62% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 41% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

LOW

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

21/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership6.3%
Most Crowded HoldingCOR (14.4%)
Least CrowdedAVAH (0.2%)
Coverage81% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XHS has a low Passive Crowding Score of 21/100. On average, 6.3% of the market capitalization of XHS's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration27.0%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1CLOV
CLOVER HEALTH INVESTMENTS CO
Healthcare
3.64%
2HUM
HUMANA INC
Healthcare
3.57%
38.4x3/9
3CNC
CENTENE CORP
Healthcare
2.85%
3/9
4BTSG
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES
Healthcare
2.63%
87.0x7/9
5PGNY
PROGYNY INC
2.53%
28.6x
6GH
GUARDANT HEALTH INC
2.47%
5/9
7UNH
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
Healthcare
2.36%
30.2x6/9
8AMN
AMN HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC
Healthcare
2.33%
9ASTH
ASTRANA HEALTH INC
Healthcare
2.30%
75.8x
10DVA
DAVITA INC
Healthcare
2.29%
20.0x6/9
11ELV
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
Healthcare
2.28%
16.5x4/9
12MOH
MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC
Healthcare
2.25%
52.4x4/9
13CVS
CVS HEALTH CORP
Healthcare
2.21%
43.1x6/9
14CON
CONCENTRA GROUP HOLDINGS PAR
Healthcare
2.13%
17.3x
15HIMS
HIMS + HERS HEALTH INC
2.08%
53.7x
The bottom 43 stocks in XHS account for only 62.1% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XHS’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-06-21

15 holdings · 37.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CLOV3.64%889,882
2HUM3.57%11,560
3CNC2.85%55,114
4BTSG2.63%47,819
5PGNY2.53%112,873
6GH2.47%22,455
7UNH2.36%6,925
8AMN2.33%84,511
9ASTH2.30%70,661
10DVA2.29%12,769
11ELV2.28%6,817
12MOH2.25%13,465
13CVS2.21%26,100
14CON2.13%88,075
15HIMS2.08%76,372

2026-06-20

15 holdings · 37.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CLOV3.64%889,882
2HUM3.57%11,560
3CNC2.85%55,114
4BTSG2.63%47,819
5PGNY2.53%112,873
6GH2.47%22,455
7UNH2.36%6,925
8AMN2.33%84,511
9ASTH2.30%70,661
10DVA2.29%12,769
11ELV2.28%6,817
12MOH2.25%13,465
13CVS2.21%26,100
14CON2.13%88,075
15HIMS2.08%76,372

2026-06-19

15 holdings · 37.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CLOV3.64%889,882
2HUM3.57%11,560
3CNC2.85%55,114
4BTSG2.63%47,819
5PGNY2.53%112,873
6GH2.47%22,455
7UNH2.36%6,925
8AMN2.33%84,511
9ASTH2.30%70,661
10DVA2.29%12,769
11ELV2.28%6,817
12MOH2.25%13,465
13CVS2.21%26,100
14CON2.13%88,075
15HIMS2.08%76,372

2026-06-18

15 holdings · 37.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CLOV3.70%871,524
2HUM3.60%11,322
3CNC2.85%53,976
4BTSG2.58%46,833
5PGNY2.53%110,545
6GH2.41%21,991
7UNH2.38%6,783
8ELV2.28%6,677
9ASTH2.28%69,203
10MOH2.27%13,187
11AMN2.27%82,767
12DVA2.25%12,505
13CVS2.21%25,562
14CON2.11%86,257
15NEO2.04%226,392

2026-06-17

15 holdings · 38.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1HUM3.71%11,322
2CLOV3.61%871,524
3CNC2.95%53,976
4BTSG2.58%46,833
5PGNY2.56%110,545
6GH2.46%21,991
7UNH2.40%6,783
8ELV2.31%6,677
9MOH2.29%13,187
10ASTH2.29%69,203
11DVA2.26%12,505
12CVS2.22%25,562
13AMN2.20%82,767
14NEO2.16%226,392
15CON2.09%86,257

2026-06-16

15 holdings · 38.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1HUM3.71%10,965
2CLOV3.61%843,990
3CNC2.95%52,272
4BTSG2.58%45,354
5PGNY2.56%107,053
6GH2.46%21,295
7UNH2.37%6,570
8ELV2.31%6,467
9MOH2.29%12,770
10ASTH2.29%67,016
11DVA2.26%12,109
12CVS2.22%24,755
13AMN2.20%80,151
14NEO2.16%219,240
15CON2.09%83,533

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

20.9%
Annual Volatility
1.16
Sharpe (1Y)
0.35
Sharpe (3Y)
-17.8%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-32.6%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XHS Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.99%(2026-06-18)

Top Contributors

+0.152%
+0.051%
+0.018%

Top Detractors

-0.038%
-0.041%
-0.053%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XHS’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-06-2166 snapshots
Healthcare57.6%
Other40.6%
Financial Services1.9%
Change since 2026-03-30
Healthcare
+1.8%
Other
-1.6%
Financial Services
-0.2%
2026-03-302026-06-21

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-18.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.