ETF · Broad Market

XOP(XOP)

$170.18
+2.25%
Expense Ratio
$3.5B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
98.0%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards Energy, with over 56% of its assets concentrated in this space. This is accompanied by a smaller but still notable exposure to Other sectors and Basic Materials, which combined account for less than half of the fund's total weight. The weighted valuation metrics suggest that the portfolio has a moderate growth profile, with a price-to-earnings ratio of 14.5x and a price-to-book ratio of 4.05x.

The top holdings exhibit a mix of integrated oil majors, refiners, and midstream operators, which is consistent with the fund's Energy sector focus. However, there are some notable single-stock concentrations, including PBF, PARR, DK, DINO, VLO, MPC, TPL, PSX, EXE, and PR, which together account for over 25% of the portfolio's assets. This may make the fund more susceptible to idiosyncratic risks associated with these specific companies. The sector mix diverges from the broader market, where Energy is a smaller component, suggesting that this portfolio is positioned to benefit from an environment characterized by rising energy prices or increased investment in the sector.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 09:18:09.043426+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker XOP is explicitly focused on energy, and this focus is strongly reflected in the portfolio composition. The top holdings are almost exclusively comprised of companies operating within the energy sector, with labels such as DINO, APA, FANG, MPC, VLO, CRGY, and DVN clearly identifying them as producers or refiners. While a small number of positions lack explicit sector tags in the provided data, their presence alongside dominant energy names suggests they are likely upstream service providers or midstream operators integral to the value chain rather than unrelated diversifiers. The portfolio does not exhibit signs of using broad-market mega-cap stocks merely to stabilize returns; instead, every significant holding appears functionally aligned with the core objective of providing exposure to the oil and gas industry.

Sector coherence is high, as energy constitutes nearly 57% of the total assets under management, dwarfing the minimal allocation to basic materials at just over one percent. This heavy weighting ensures that the fund's performance remains tightly coupled with commodity prices rather than broader macroeconomic trends affecting unrelated industries. The concentration risk profile appears manageable given a top-ten holding weight of roughly 29%, which indicates diversification across approximately twenty-six distinct entities within the energy space. Consequently, the fund maintains a clear differentiation from broad market indices by avoiding significant exposure to technology, healthcare, or financial services sectors. The structure suggests a genuine thematic mandate where sector weights are consistent with the stated goal of isolating returns specifically from the energy complex without dilution from unrelated assets.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 05:39:13.168027+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of XOP is defined by a dominant exposure to the Energy industry, which accounts for nearly 57% of total assets. This heavy weighting indicates an investment thesis strictly centered on oil and gas producers rather than a broad-based commodity strategy that would typically include significant allocations to Basic Materials or other sectors. The minimal presence in Basic Materials at just 1.6% suggests the fund avoids diversification across the broader resource complex, instead focusing exclusively on companies with direct operational ties to hydrocarbon extraction and production. Consequently, the portfolio's performance will likely mirror macroeconomic drivers specific to crude oil prices and energy demand rather than general commodity cycles or industrial growth trends.

Concentration risk is a defining characteristic of this structure, evidenced by both the singular sector dominance and the top-10 holdings concentration of 29.2%. With twenty-six distinct positions in Energy alone, the fund maintains some internal diversification within its primary sector but remains highly vulnerable to idiosyncratic risks affecting major producers like SM, DINO, APA, CHRD, and FANG. The fact that these five entities comprise a substantial portion of the portfolio implies that adverse events impacting any single leader could disproportionately influence overall returns. This setup creates a factor tilt toward large-cap value characteristics often associated with established energy majors, while simultaneously exposing investors to heightened volatility if market sentiment shifts away from traditional fossil fuel assets or if regulatory changes target the specific operational models of these top holders.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 16:39:31.347978+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XOP's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XOP's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VDEVDE$13B4894.6%
SPTMSPTM$12B3885.4%
VYMVanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares$90B2666.2%
ONEOONEO$25M2252.9%
VFVAVFVA$758M2147.5%

95% of XOP's portfolio by weight is also held by VDE, which commands 4× more assets under management. When VDE receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XOP's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXOP's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

15.1x
Weighted P/E
4.56x
Weighted P/B
$48B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 85% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000237
Well Diversified
Top 5: 16.0%Top 10: 29.6%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Energy56.8%Other40.8%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
99% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
11%
0–3 Weak
58%
4–6 Average
30%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
67%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.78%
TTM Yield
Safe
Dividend Durability
67% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XOP collectively pay out 67% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 58% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+33.9%
ETF 1Y Return
+34.5%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-0.6%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

XOP is up 33.9% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +34.5%. Price performance is closely aligned with fundamental earnings growth — valuations are roughly unchanged.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 86% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XOP's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

54% Creators
46% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)43.5%
Value Destroyers36.6%

Of XOP's analyzed weight, 54% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 46% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 80% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

29/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership8.6%
Most Crowded HoldingAPA (19.9%)
Least CrowdedVG (0.7%)
Coverage88% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XOP has a Passive Crowding Score of 29/100. On average, 8.6% of the market capitalization of XOP's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 10 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration29.6%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1PBF
PBF ENERGY INC CLASS A
3.61%
16.1x
2PARR
PAR PACIFIC HOLDINGS INC
3.23%
8.4x7/9
3DK
DELEK US HOLDINGS INC
Energy
3.15%
4DINO
HF SINCLAIR CORP
Energy
3.09%
13.0x7/9
5VLO
VALERO ENERGY CORP
Energy
2.93%
21.9x6/9
6MPC
MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP
Energy
2.93%
20.1x7/9
7TPL
TEXAS PACIFIC LAND CORP
Energy
2.79%
57.2x4/9
8PSX
PHILLIPS 66
Energy
2.79%
19.9x6/9
9CNX
CNX RESOURCES CORP
Energy
2.54%
10.1x8/9
10PR
PERMIAN RESOURCES CORP CL A
2.52%
17.1x4/9
11EXE
EXPAND ENERGY CORP
Energy
2.51%
6.6x8/9
12VNOM
VIPER ENERGY INC CL A
2.48%
13EOG
EOG RESOURCES INC
Energy
2.47%
13.6x3/9
14OVV
OVINTIV INC
2.45%
12.9x8/9
15XOM
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP
Energy
2.44%
24.8x5/9
The bottom 38 stocks in XOP account for only 58.1% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XOP’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-19

15 holdings · 41.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PBF3.61%1,968,684
2PARR3.23%1,454,236
3DK3.15%1,700,780
4DINO3.09%1,184,362
5VLO2.93%324,828
6MPC2.93%318,271
7TPL2.79%223,368
8PSX2.79%461,210
9CNX2.54%2,524,237
10PR2.52%4,247,597
11EXE2.51%946,317
12VNOM2.48%1,871,544
13EOG2.47%597,439
14OVV2.45%1,446,405
15XOM2.44%556,398

2026-07-18

15 holdings · 41.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PBF3.61%1,968,684
2PARR3.23%1,454,236
3DK3.15%1,700,780
4DINO3.09%1,184,362
5VLO2.93%324,828
6MPC2.93%318,271
7TPL2.79%223,368
8PSX2.79%461,210
9CNX2.54%2,524,237
10PR2.52%4,247,597
11EXE2.51%946,317
12VNOM2.48%1,871,544
13EOG2.47%597,439
14OVV2.45%1,446,405
15XOM2.44%556,398

2026-07-17

15 holdings · 41.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PBF3.51%1,934,181
2PARR3.23%1,428,749
3DK3.08%1,670,967
4DINO3.02%1,163,607
5MPC2.89%312,692
6VLO2.88%319,137
7TPL2.80%219,455
8PSX2.74%453,125
9CNX2.55%2,479,997
10PR2.52%4,173,152
11EXE2.52%929,734
12EOG2.49%586,967
13VG2.47%6,195,426
14VNOM2.46%1,838,742
15OVV2.46%1,421,051

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 41.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PBF3.62%1,958,826
2PARR3.23%1,446,954
3DK3.13%1,692,262
4DINO2.97%1,178,437
5VLO2.95%323,202
6MPC2.91%316,677
7PSX2.80%458,900
8TPL2.80%222,250
9VG2.52%6,274,371
10PR2.51%4,226,332
11EXE2.51%941,579
12EOG2.49%594,447
13CNX2.46%2,511,602
14OVV2.46%1,439,161
15FANG2.45%424,256

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 41.3% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PBF3.42%2,067,264
2PARR3.12%1,527,056
3DK2.99%1,785,960
4DINO2.93%1,243,689
5VLO2.91%341,088
6MPC2.86%334,211
7PSX2.77%484,310
8TPL2.77%234,548
9VG2.55%6,621,751
10EOG2.53%627,359
11PR2.52%4,460,324
12EXE2.50%993,719
13OVV2.48%1,518,845
14FANG2.47%447,752
15CNX2.47%2,650,664

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 41.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PBF3.30%1,958,826
2PARR3.01%1,446,954
3DK2.98%1,692,262
4DINO2.91%1,178,437
5VLO2.87%323,202
6MPC2.85%316,677
7TPL2.80%222,250
8PSX2.74%458,900
9EXE2.60%941,579
10PR2.56%4,226,332
11CNX2.54%2,511,602
12OVV2.53%1,439,161
13EOG2.52%594,447
14VNOM2.48%1,862,172
15MTDR2.47%1,518,618

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

33.9%
Annual Volatility
1.08
Sharpe (1Y)
0.33
Sharpe (3Y)
-35.0%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-35.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XOP Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+2.25%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.214%
+0.107%
+0.100%

Top Detractors

-0.001%
-0.002%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.78%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XOP’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1994 snapshots
Energy56.8%
Other40.8%
Basic Materials2.4%
Change since 2026-03-30
Energy
-1.2%
Basic Materials
+1.0%
Other
+0.2%
2026-03-302026-07-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.