ETF · Broad Market

XRT(XRT)

$88.08
+1.33%
Expense Ratio
$217M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
95.9%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio exhibits a significant tilt towards consumer-facing sectors, with over 90% of its allocation concentrated in Consumer Cyclical and Defensive stocks. This is reflected in its top holdings, which include names like GRPN, REAL, and BBWI, all of which are involved in various aspects of the retail industry. The fund's sector mix also includes a notable allocation to Other, which may encompass a range of industries not captured by the provided sector classification.

The portfolio's valuation posture appears relatively reasonable, with a weighted P/E ratio of 17.3x and a weighted P/B ratio of 4.04x, suggesting that it is neither aggressively nor conservatively positioned in terms of valuation. However, the fund's concentration risk is elevated due to its top-10 holdings, which account for approximately 20% of the portfolio's assets. A notable single-stock dominance is not present, but the sector mix diverges from the broader market, suggesting that it may be more sensitive to changes in consumer spending patterns and retail industry trends.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-06 10:07:23.606666+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 45/100

The thematic alignment between the fund's name and its actual composition reveals a significant divergence. While the ticker XRT typically denotes exposure to regional banks, the provided holdings list consists almost entirely of retail-focused entities within the Consumer Cyclical sector, such as eBay, Amazon, and Etsy, alongside several unclassified positions like HZO and MUSA that do not fit a banking narrative. This discrepancy suggests the fund may be utilizing a thematic name while tracking assets driven by consumer spending patterns rather than financial services leverage or regional economic indicators found in traditional bank indices. The presence of multiple holdings marked as "N/A" further obscures whether these specific positions are intended to support a broader theme or if they represent data gaps that weaken the stated investment thesis.

Sector coherence is present but limited, with Consumer Cyclical stocks dominating at 43.6%, yet this concentration does not differentiate the fund from broad consumer indices given the heavy weighting toward mega-cap retailers like Amazon and eBay in the top positions. The secondary exposure to Consumer Defensive sectors adds stability but dilutes any potential for high-growth thematic returns associated with volatile retail cycles. Although the top-10 concentration remains relatively low at 17.2%, indicating a diversified portfolio within its chosen sector, the fundamental disconnect between the implied banking theme and the actual retail-heavy asset allocation creates ambiguity regarding the fund's true risk profile. Investors observing these holdings would likely find that the performance drivers are more closely tied to e-commerce trends than regional credit quality or interest rate sensitivity associated with bank stocks.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 19:02:03.079478+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The XRT ETF exhibits a pronounced exposure to the Consumer Cyclical sector, which accounts for 43.6% of its portfolio across thirty-three holdings. This heavy weighting suggests an investment thesis centered on companies whose revenues fluctuate significantly with economic cycles and consumer discretionary spending power. In contrast, the allocation to Consumer Defensive stocks stands at only 10.8%, indicating a deliberate underweighting relative to typical broad market benchmarks that often seek stability through these sectors during periods of uncertainty. This structural tilt implies the fund is positioned for environments where robust consumer demand persists but may not prioritize capital preservation over growth potential derived from cyclical trends.

Concentration risk within this vehicle appears moderate, with the top ten holdings comprising just 17.2% of total assets under management. Despite having only five specific securities listed among the largest positions, their individual weights hover around 1.8%, suggesting a strategy that favors diversification across many names rather than relying on heavy reliance in mega-cap leaders like Amazon or eBay. The presence of multiple holdings with identical weightings further points to an index-tracking methodology designed to maintain uniform representation within sector buckets rather than actively concentrating capital on perceived outperformers.

Factor tilts inferred from this allocation profile likely include a bias toward momentum and growth, given the dominance of consumer discretionary names which often trade at higher valuations compared to defensive peers. However, the relatively low concentration in any single top holding mitigates some of the idiosyncratic risks associated with individual stock volatility. Ultimately, the fund's structure reflects a clear bet on cyclical economic expansion while maintaining sufficient breadth across thirty-three sector-specific names to dilute exposure to any single corporate event or industry shock.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 13:02:52.087513+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XRT's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XRT's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPTMSPTM$12B5979.4%
VCRVCR$6B5876.4%
ONEOONEO$25M4053.0%
VFVAVFVA$758M2635.1%
VFQYVFQY$411M2432.9%

79% of XRT's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM, which commands 54× more assets under management. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XRT's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXRT's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

17.3x
Weighted P/E
4.09x
Weighted P/B
$68B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 85% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000136
Well Diversified
Top 5: 8.5%Top 10: 16.2%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other46.7%Consumer Cyclical42.6%Consumer Defensive10.7%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
95% Weight
Market Cap
Mid
Risk Profile
Moderate

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
6%
0–3 Weak
67%
4–6 Average
21%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
101%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.64%
TTM Yield
At Risk
Dividend Durability
101% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XRT collectively pay out 101% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. Warning: constituent companies are paying out nearly all cash flow. A wave of dividend cuts may be imminent if earnings decline. Based on 43% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+10.4%
ETF 1Y Return
+14.1%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-3.7%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

XRT is up 10.4% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +14.1%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 3.7% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 92% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XRT's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

59% Creators
41% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)42.5%
Value Destroyers28.9%

Of XRT's analyzed weight, 59% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 41% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 71% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

LOW

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

21/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership6.4%
Most Crowded HoldingTSCO (23.1%)
Least CrowdedDDS (0.2%)
Coverage85% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XRT has a low Passive Crowding Score of 21/100. On average, 6.4% of the market capitalization of XRT's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration16.2%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1GRPN
GROUPON INC
1.98%
2CPNG
COUPANG INC
Consumer Cyclical
1.73%
163.8x6/9
3WRBY
WARBY PARKER INC CLASS A
1.60%
2514.0x
4CART
MAPLEBEAR INC
Consumer Cyclical
1.59%
23.0x6/9
5REAL
REALREAL INC/THE
1.57%
6RVLV
REVOLVE GROUP INC
1.55%
27.1x5/9
7SAH
SONIC AUTOMOTIVE INC CLASS A
1.54%
19.6x5/9
8ETSY
ETSY INC
Consumer Cyclical
1.54%
29.1x5/9
9UPBD
UPBOUND GROUP INC
1.53%
14.7x6/9
10SBH
SALLY BEAUTY HOLDINGS INC
1.53%
8.6x
11EYE
NATIONAL VISION HOLDINGS INC
1.51%
66.2x8/9
12GO
GROCERY OUTLET HOLDING CORP
1.50%
13EBAY
EBAY INC
Consumer Cyclical
1.50%
27.1x4/9
14BBWI
BATH + BODY WORKS INC
Consumer Cyclical
1.50%
6.0x5/9
15DLTR
DOLLAR TREE INC
Consumer Defensive
1.49%
18.8x8/9
The bottom 61 stocks in XRT account for only 76.3% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XRT’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-13

15 holdings · 23.7% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1GRPN1.98%320,349
2CPNG1.73%387,663
3WRBY1.60%234,281
4CART1.59%142,237
5REAL1.57%642,704
6RVLV1.55%288,028
7SAH1.54%69,655
8ETSY1.54%85,286
9SBH1.53%448,134
10UPBD1.53%324,195
11EYE1.51%333,412
12GO1.50%634,354
13EBAY1.50%55,082
14BBWI1.50%323,482
15DLTR1.49%53,128

2026-07-12

15 holdings · 23.7% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1GRPN1.98%320,349
2CPNG1.73%387,663
3WRBY1.60%234,281
4CART1.59%142,237
5REAL1.57%642,704
6RVLV1.55%288,028
7SAH1.54%69,655
8ETSY1.54%85,286
9SBH1.53%448,134
10UPBD1.53%324,195
11EYE1.51%333,412
12GO1.50%634,354
13EBAY1.50%55,082
14BBWI1.50%323,482
15DLTR1.49%53,128

2026-07-11

15 holdings · 23.7% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1GRPN1.98%320,349
2CPNG1.73%387,663
3WRBY1.60%234,281
4CART1.59%142,237
5REAL1.57%642,704
6RVLV1.55%288,028
7SAH1.54%69,655
8ETSY1.54%85,286
9SBH1.53%448,134
10UPBD1.53%324,195
11EYE1.51%333,412
12GO1.50%634,354
13EBAY1.50%55,082
14BBWI1.50%323,482
15DLTR1.49%53,128

2026-07-10

15 holdings · 23.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1GRPN1.92%326,831
2CPNG1.73%395,505
3CART1.59%145,115
4REAL1.58%655,706
5ETSY1.55%87,012
6DLTR1.54%54,202
7GO1.53%647,188
8WRBY1.52%239,021
9EYE1.52%340,158
10UPBD1.51%330,753
11SBH1.51%457,200
12RVLV1.50%293,856
13EBAY1.49%56,196
14PSMT1.49%34,219
15HZO1.49%183,473

2026-07-09

15 holdings · 23.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1GRPN1.99%359,231
2CPNG1.66%434,715
3REAL1.63%720,716
4CART1.58%159,505
5BBWI1.55%362,746
6UPBD1.54%363,543
7ETSY1.53%95,642
8EYE1.53%373,878
9WRBY1.52%262,711
10DLTR1.51%59,572
11RVLV1.50%322,986
12GO1.50%711,348
13PSMT1.49%37,609
14SBH1.49%502,520
15HZO1.48%201,663

2026-07-08

15 holdings · 23.7% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1GRPN1.96%359,231
2CPNG1.71%434,715
3REAL1.70%720,716
4BBWI1.64%362,746
5WRBY1.58%262,711
6CART1.55%159,505
7EYE1.54%373,878
8UPBD1.54%363,543
9GO1.52%711,348
10RVLV1.51%322,986
11PSMT1.50%37,609
12DLTR1.49%59,572
13TDUP1.48%1,039,037
14ETSY1.48%95,642
15HZO1.47%201,663

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

26.8%
Annual Volatility
0.35
Sharpe (1Y)
0.42
Sharpe (3Y)
-25.6%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-44.6%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XRT Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+1.33%(2026-07-10)

Top Contributors

+0.070%
+0.066%
+0.051%

Top Detractors

-0.002%
-0.010%
-0.026%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.64%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XRT’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1388 snapshots
Other46.7%
Consumer Cyclical42.6%
Consumer Defensive10.7%
Change since 2026-03-30
Other
+2.0%
Consumer Cyclical
-1.1%
Consumer Defensive
-0.9%
2026-03-302026-07-13

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-10.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.