ETF · Broad Market

XSW(XSW)

$178.60
+0.16%
Expense Ratio
$375M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
94.9%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily tilted towards Technology, accounting for nearly half of its holdings, with Other sectors making up another substantial portion. This suggests that the fund has a strong affinity for growth-oriented companies. Geographically, there isn't any notable exposure to international markets, implying a domestic focus. The market-cap profile appears to be skewed towards mid-to-large cap stocks, given the weighted P/E and P/B ratios are on the higher side.

Concentration risk is moderate, with the top 10 holdings accounting for approximately 9% of the portfolio each. PRCH and RPD share the same weightage as TENB, indicating some degree of diversification among these technology names. The sector mix diverges significantly from the broader market, which could be a result of the fund's focus on growth. A favorable macro environment would likely involve sustained technological advancements and strong demand for innovative products and services. Conversely, a slowdown in tech spending or increased competition could pose challenges to this portfolio.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 10:01:30.720055+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 92/100

The XSW ETF demonstrates a strong thematic alignment with its name, which implies exposure to artificial intelligence infrastructure and computing. The top holdings are predominantly concentrated in technology firms known for their roles in data centers, semiconductor manufacturing, or AI software development, such as DDOG, CRWD, and FTNT. While several names like HUT, RIOT, MARA, WULF, and CLSK lack explicit sector classifications in the provided list, these entities are widely recognized within the market context as key players in Bitcoin mining and digital assets, sectors often grouped under the broader AI narrative due to their shared reliance on high-performance computing power. The absence of unrelated mega-cap stocks or broad-market names suggests that the fund has not diluted its thematic focus with generic large-cap holdings merely for stability, maintaining a tight adherence to the specific technological drivers implied by its ticker and title.

Sector coherence is evident given that nearly half of the portfolio's assets are allocated directly to the Technology sector, reinforcing the primary investment thesis. The inclusion of Financial Services and Communication Services in smaller weights adds necessary nuance without obscuring the core theme, as these sectors often contain companies providing essential financial infrastructure or connectivity required for AI expansion. With a top-10 concentration of 11.5%, the fund avoids excessive reliance on any single issuer while still capturing significant exposure to leading names within its niche. The distribution across sixty-one holdings indicates a strategy designed to capture sector-wide growth rather than betting heavily on individual outliers, resulting in a portfolio structure that appears genuinely differentiated from broad market indices and consistent with a specialized thematic approach.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 15:38:40.637995+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The XSW ETF exhibits a highly concentrated sector profile dominated by the Technology industry, which accounts for 45.6% of total assets across sixty-one holdings. This overwhelming exposure suggests an investment thesis centered entirely on digital infrastructure and cryptocurrency-related equities rather than broad-based tech innovation or consumer discretionary spending. The remaining sectors present negligible diversification; Financial Services and Communication Services each contribute less than 3%, while Industrials are virtually absent with a mere 0.6% allocation. Such a narrow sector footprint indicates that the fund's performance will be inextricably linked to the cyclical fortunes of the technology market, leaving it vulnerable to industry-specific downturns without meaningful hedging through other economic sectors.

Concentration risk is further amplified by the top ten holdings representing 11.7% of the portfolio, with individual positions like AIP and DDOG exceeding one percent each. While this level of concentration might be typical for a specialized niche fund, it implies that idiosyncratic risks associated with specific companies or sub-segments within technology could disproportionately impact overall returns. The inclusion of holdings categorized as "N/A" alongside clear Technology labels reinforces the idea that the fund targets a very specific micro-cap segment rather than established large-cap leaders. This structural design points to a high-beta strategy seeking aggressive growth potential, but it simultaneously exposes investors to significant volatility driven by the limited universe of underlying securities and the absence of defensive or value-oriented assets within the allocation.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 07:42:18.835863+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XSW's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XSW's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VGTVGT$122B12796.1%
SPTMSPTM$12B6849.2%
VBKVBK$40B5945.1%
ONEOONEO$25M5237.7%
VONGVONG$46B3929.1%

96% of XSW's portfolio by weight is also held by VGT, which commands 326× more assets under management. When VGT receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XSW's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXSW's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

23.5x
Weighted P/E
8.28x
Weighted P/B
$42B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 52% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400078
Well Diversified
Top 5: 5.6%Top 10: 10.6%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other49.6%Technology44.0%Communication Services3.1%Financial Services2.6%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
99% Weight
Market Cap
Mid
Risk Profile
Elevated

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
10%
0–3 Weak
60%
4–6 Average
30%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
23%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
23% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XSW collectively pay out 23% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 11% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
-5.5%
ETF 1Y Return
+33.7%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-39.2%
Multiple Contraction

XSW is down 5.5% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +33.7%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 39.2% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 91% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XSW's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

46% Creators
54% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)20.9%
Value Destroyers24.9%

Of XSW's analyzed weight, 46% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 54% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 46% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

LOW

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

24/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership7.2%
Most Crowded HoldingROP (42.3%)
Least CrowdedCXM (1.5%)
Coverage51% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XSW has a low Passive Crowding Score of 24/100. On average, 7.2% of the market capitalization of XSW's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration10.6%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1RPD
RAPID7 INC
1.27%
33.2x6/9
2NTSK
NETSKOPE INC CL A
1.19%
3TENB
TENABLE HOLDINGS INC
1.12%
6/9
4QLYS
QUALYS INC
1.05%
29.5x7/9
5VRNS
VARONIS SYSTEMS INC
1.03%
5/9
6PRCH
PORCH GROUP INC
1.03%
7YEXT
YEXT INC
1.01%
8AMPL
AMPLITUDE INC CLASS A
Technology
0.99%
9S
SENTINELONE INC CLASS A
0.95%
4/9
10PANW
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC
Technology
0.94%
292.6x4/9
11WEAV
WEAVE COMMUNICATIONS INC
0.94%
12RBLX
ROBLOX CORP CLASS A
Communication Services
0.92%
6/9
13CRWD
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC A
Technology
0.92%
4/9
14CCC
CCC INTELLIGENT SOLUTIONS HO
Technology
0.91%
15BILL
BILL HOLDINGS INC
Technology
0.90%
The bottom 118 stocks in XSW account for only 84.9% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 133.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XSW’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 15.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1RPD1.27%428,311
2NTSK1.19%364,596
3TENB1.12%115,230
4QLYS1.05%28,023
5VRNS1.03%93,865
6PRCH1.03%328,176
7YEXT1.01%812,662
8AMPL0.99%447,552
9S0.95%208,797
10PANW0.94%11,734
11WEAV0.94%553,423
12RBLX0.92%74,414
13CRWD0.92%19,090
14CCC0.91%657,045
15BILL0.90%95,343

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 14.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1RPD1.16%428,311
2NTSK1.06%364,596
3TENB1.03%115,230
4PRCH1.00%328,176
5VRNS0.97%93,865
6QLYS0.97%28,023
7YEXT0.96%812,662
8AMPL0.95%447,552
9RBLX0.93%74,414
10CCC0.93%657,045
11BILL0.93%95,343
12WEAV0.92%553,423
13ACIW0.91%70,617
14PAR0.90%229,090
15PANW0.88%11,734

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 14.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PRCH1.12%329,511
2RPD1.10%430,053
3TENB1.05%115,699
4NTSK1.03%366,079
5QLYS0.98%28,137
6VRNS0.96%94,247
7YEXT0.95%815,967
8RBLX0.95%74,717
9AMPL0.94%449,372
10ACIW0.91%70,904
11BILL0.91%95,731
12CCC0.89%659,717
13PAR0.89%230,022
14WEAV0.88%555,674
15PANW0.88%11,782

2026-07-13

15 holdings · 14.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PRCH1.13%328,176
2RPD1.11%428,311
3TENB1.08%115,230
4NTSK1.03%364,596
5QLYS1.01%28,023
6VRNS0.98%93,865
7RBLX0.95%74,414
8AMPL0.95%447,552
9YEXT0.93%812,662
10ACIW0.90%70,617
11PANW0.90%11,734
12S0.89%208,797
13BILL0.88%95,343
14RBRK0.87%43,299
15PAR0.87%229,090

2026-07-12

15 holdings · 14.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PRCH1.13%328,176
2RPD1.11%428,311
3TENB1.08%115,230
4NTSK1.03%364,596
5QLYS1.01%28,023
6VRNS0.98%93,865
7RBLX0.95%74,414
8AMPL0.95%447,552
9YEXT0.93%812,662
10ACIW0.90%70,617
11PANW0.90%11,734
12S0.89%208,797
13BILL0.88%95,343
14RBRK0.87%43,299
15PAR0.87%229,090

2026-07-11

15 holdings · 14.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1PRCH1.13%328,176
2RPD1.11%428,311
3TENB1.08%115,230
4NTSK1.03%364,596
5QLYS1.01%28,023
6VRNS0.98%93,865
7RBLX0.95%74,414
8AMPL0.95%447,552
9YEXT0.93%812,662
10ACIW0.90%70,617
11PANW0.90%11,734
12S0.89%208,797
13BILL0.88%95,343
14RBRK0.87%43,299
15PAR0.87%229,090

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

28.5%
Annual Volatility
-0.20
Sharpe (1Y)
0.30
Sharpe (3Y)
-33.8%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-45.4%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XSW Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.16%(2026-07-15)

Top Contributors

+0.102%
+0.099%
+0.090%

Top Detractors

-0.039%
-0.042%
-0.189%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XSW’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1691 snapshots
Other49.6%
Technology44.0%
Communication Services3.1%
Financial Services2.6%
Industrials0.6%
Change since 2026-03-30
Other
+2.2%
Technology
-2.1%
Communication Services
+0.1%
Financial Services
-0.1%
2026-03-302026-07-16

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

Comparing 2026-07-152026-07-162 buys, 2 sells

Positions Increased (2)

NEWZETA
0155K+155K
0.80%(+0.80)
NEWBOX
0117K+117K
0.80%(+0.80)

Positions Decreased (2)

EXITFRSH
329K0-329K (-100.0%)
0.00%(-0.81)
EXITHUBS
16K0-16K (-100.0%)
0.00%(-0.79)

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-15.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.