ETF · Broad Market

XTN(XTN)

$113.53
+1.71%
Expense Ratio
$267M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
98.5%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is predominantly skewed towards Industrials, which accounts for approximately 44% of the fund's holdings, followed by Other sectors at around 54%. This suggests that the fund has a significant exposure to industrial companies. The Technology sector, on the other hand, represents less than 2% of the fund's holdings, indicating limited exposure to this area.

The top holdings reveal a concentration in logistics and transportation companies, with RXO being the largest holding at around 4.8%. This suggests that the portfolio is heavily reliant on these sectors for returns. The weighted P/E ratio of 19.0x indicates that the fund's holdings are trading at a premium to the market average, while the weighted P/B ratio of 3.51x suggests that they are also trading at a slight premium to book value.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-06-12 10:11:58.459076+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker XTN, often associated with transportation or logistics networks, shows a strong alignment with its actual portfolio composition. The top holdings are predominantly comprised of major players within the freight and trucking sectors, such as CAR, JBHT, and CSX, which directly support an infrastructure-focused narrative. While several smaller positions like RXO and SNDR lack explicit sector classifications in the provided data, their inclusion alongside established industrial leaders suggests a cohesive strategy rather than random selection. The presence of airlines like DAL and AAL further broadens the scope to general transportation services, reinforcing the logistical theme without introducing unrelated industries that would dilute the fund's identity.

Sector coherence is evident as Industrials dominate the allocation at 44.4%, reflecting a heavy reliance on physical infrastructure companies rather than abstract technological concepts often found in similarly named funds. The minimal exposure to Technology at just 2.4% indicates that the fund avoids becoming a disguised broad-market proxy, maintaining distinct differentiation from large-cap indices through its specific focus on logistics operators and carriers. Although the top-10 concentration sits at 30.8%, which is moderate for this sector, the diversity of holdings across various sub-segments of transportation suggests the portfolio captures industry-wide trends rather than being overly dependent on a single mega-cap stock to drive performance. This structure supports the thematic premise while managing individual security risk through a diversified basket of specialized operators.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 03:27:48.490943+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The XTN ETF exhibits a distinctively concentrated portfolio heavily weighted toward the Industrials sector, which comprises over 44% of total assets across eighteen holdings. This allocation suggests an investment thesis centered on logistics and transportation infrastructure rather than broad-based industrial diversification or exposure to growth-oriented technology sectors, where representation is minimal at just 2.3%. The dominance of this single sector implies that the fund's performance will be tightly correlated with macroeconomic drivers specific to shipping, freight services, and supply chain management, potentially amplifying volatility during periods of economic disruption in these industries while offering heightened upside if logistics demand surges.

Concentration risk is further elevated by a top-10 holding concentration of 31.7%, indicating that the fund relies heavily on its largest positions to generate returns. The presence of multiple mid-cap freight and logistics carriers such as RXO, CAR, SAIA, ARCB, and WERN within the leading holdings reinforces a specific tilt toward specialized transportation providers rather than diversified industrial conglomerates or large-cap blue chips. This structural characteristic means that idiosyncratic risks associated with individual companies in this niche are more likely to impact overall portfolio stability compared to broader sector funds. Additionally, the near-absence of technology exposure highlights an intentional avoidance of digital transformation plays within traditional logistics, focusing instead on operational and physical asset-heavy components of the supply chain ecosystem.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 02:24:41.851653+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XTN's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XTN's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VISVIS$8B4296.7%
SPTMSPTM$12B3991.7%
ONEOONEO$25M2866.8%
VBRVBR$62B1640.9%
VONVVONV$18B1639.6%

97% of XTN's portfolio by weight is also held by VIS, which commands 29× more assets under management. When VIS receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XTN's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXTN's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

18.7x
Weighted P/E
3.49x
Weighted P/B
$24B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 74% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000257
Well Diversified
Top 5: 17.9%Top 10: 32.5%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other53.0%Industrials44.9%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
97% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
15%
0–3 Weak
54%
4–6 Average
28%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
37%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
37% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XTN collectively pay out 37% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 44% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+49.6%
ETF 1Y Return
-13.5%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+63.1%
Multiple Expansion
P/E Inflation

XTN is up 49.6% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is -13.5%. The remaining +63.1% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 94% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XTN's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

15% Creators
85% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)11.6%
Value Destroyers66.1%

Of XTN's analyzed weight, 15% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 85% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 78% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

26/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership7.8%
Most Crowded HoldingAAL (22.8%)
Least CrowdedGNK (0.3%)
Coverage85% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XTN has a Passive Crowding Score of 26/100. On average, 7.8% of the market capitalization of XTN's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 7 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration32.1%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1RXO
RXO INC
4.19%
5/9
2CAR
AVIS BUDGET GROUP INC
Industrials
3.83%
3/9
3ARCB
ARCBEST CORP
Industrials
3.40%
70.9x3/9
4SNDR
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL INC CL B
3.02%
68.6x7/9
5LSTR
LANDSTAR SYSTEM INC
3.00%
62.1x5/9
6AAL
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC
Industrials
3.00%
48.3x4/9
7DAL
DELTA AIR LINES INC
Industrials
2.98%
12.1x6/9
8R
RYDER SYSTEM INC
2.93%
23.3x8/9
9WERN
WERNER ENTERPRISES INC
2.89%
10KNX
KNIGHT SWIFT TRANSPORTATION
2.81%
388.3x5/9
11UAL
UNITED AIRLINES HOLDINGS INC
Industrials
2.74%
10.3x7/9
12JBHT
HUNT (JB) TRANSPRT SVCS INC
Industrials
2.73%
44.9x8/9
13MATX
MATSON INC
2.70%
11.6x5/9
14SAIA
SAIA INC
2.68%
50.8x5/9
15UHAL.B
U HAUL HOLDING CO NON VOTING
2.63%
The bottom 30 stocks in XTN account for only 54.5% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XTN’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-06-19

15 holdings · 45.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1RXO4.19%395,621
2CAR3.83%49,695
3ARCB3.40%54,710
4SNDR3.02%200,009
5LSTR3.00%33,817
6AAL3.00%455,460
7DAL2.98%85,022
8R2.93%25,843
9WERN2.89%169,875
10KNX2.81%90,225
11UAL2.74%55,448
12JBHT2.73%23,904
13MATX2.70%32,666
14SAIA2.68%14,726
15UHAL.B2.63%114,098

2026-06-18

15 holdings · 46.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1RXO4.44%395,621
2CAR3.80%49,695
3ARCB3.60%54,710
4SNDR3.05%200,009
5LSTR3.01%33,817
6AAL2.95%455,460
7WERN2.95%169,875
8R2.93%25,843
9DAL2.91%85,022
10KNX2.88%90,225
11SAIA2.77%14,726
12JBHT2.76%23,904
13UAL2.71%55,448
14MATX2.64%32,666
15UHAL.B2.59%114,098

2026-06-17

15 holdings · 46.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1RXO4.47%395,621
2CAR3.85%49,695
3ARCB3.66%54,710
4SNDR3.08%200,009
5LSTR3.03%33,817
6WERN2.99%169,875
7R2.92%25,843
8KNX2.92%90,225
9DAL2.92%85,022
10AAL2.87%455,460
11SAIA2.85%14,726
12JBHT2.76%23,904
13UAL2.71%55,448
14MATX2.60%32,666
15ODFL2.58%26,636

2026-06-16

15 holdings · 46.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1RXO4.47%393,734
2CAR3.85%49,458
3ARCB3.66%54,449
4SNDR3.08%199,055
5LSTR3.03%33,656
6WERN2.99%169,065
7R2.92%25,720
8KNX2.92%89,795
9DAL2.92%84,616
10AAL2.87%453,288
11SAIA2.85%14,656
12JBHT2.76%23,790
13UAL2.71%55,184
14MATX2.60%32,510
15ODFL2.58%26,509

2026-06-15

15 holdings · 46.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1RXO4.62%391,847
2ARCB3.87%54,188
3CAR3.86%49,221
4LSTR3.12%33,495
5SNDR3.11%198,101
6WERN3.05%168,255
7KNX3.05%89,365
8R2.97%25,597
9SAIA2.94%14,586
10DAL2.85%84,211
11JBHT2.83%23,676
12AAL2.73%451,116
13ODFL2.70%26,382
14MATX2.66%32,354
15UAL2.56%54,920

2026-06-14

15 holdings · 46.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1RXO4.62%391,847
2ARCB3.87%54,188
3CAR3.86%49,221
4LSTR3.12%33,495
5SNDR3.11%198,101
6WERN3.05%168,255
7KNX3.05%89,365
8R2.97%25,597
9SAIA2.94%14,586
10DAL2.85%84,211
11JBHT2.83%23,676
12AAL2.73%451,116
13ODFL2.70%26,382
14MATX2.66%32,354
15UAL2.56%54,920

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

26.6%
Annual Volatility
1.26
Sharpe (1Y)
0.44
Sharpe (3Y)
-33.7%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-35.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XTN Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+1.71%(2026-06-18)

Top Contributors

+0.160%
+0.111%
+0.096%

Top Detractors

-0.011%
-0.030%
-0.031%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XTN’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-06-1964 snapshots
Other53.0%
Industrials44.9%
Technology2.0%
Change since 2026-03-30
Industrials
+0.7%
Technology
-0.4%
Other
-0.4%
2026-03-302026-06-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-18.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.