ETF · Broad Market

DFAS(DFAS)

$79.05
+0.66%
Expense Ratio
$12.8B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Moderate
0%20%60%100%
51.3%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The provided data for DFAS presents a highly fragmented profile that contradicts the typical characteristics of an equity exchange-traded fund. With top individual holdings representing merely 0.2% to 0.3% of total assets, and sector weights distributed across Technology, Industrials, Consumer Cyclical, and Energy at similarly negligible levels, this instrument appears to function more as a broad market index tracker than a concentrated thematic vehicle. The uniformity in weight percentages suggests an equal-weighted methodology where no single company or industry group exerts meaningful influence on the fund's overall performance trajectory. Such extreme dilution across holdings implies that daily price movements of any specific constituent, including major names like AMKR or WCC visible in the list, would have a statistically insignificant impact on the ETF's net asset value relative to its $12.8 billion AUM.

Geographic tilt cannot be determined from the current dataset as no country-specific allocations are listed alongside sector exposures, leaving investors without clarity regarding regional concentration risks or opportunities inherent to this structure. The absence of meaningful exposure in any defined sector further obscures the fund's strategic intent relative to traditional active or passive mandates that seek specific economic outcomes through targeted allocation. Quantitatively, the combination of massive asset size and microscopic holding weights creates a unique risk-return profile where idiosyncratic stock volatility is theoretically neutralized by sheer breadth, yet this may also result in lower liquidity premiums for individual shares compared to more concentrated peers. Ultimately, the data indicates an ultra-diversified structure that minimizes single-stock risk while simultaneously offering limited visibility into specific sector-driven growth drivers or defensive characteristics usually associated with defined industry tilts.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-17 21:41:56.283445+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 85/100

The investment theme implied by the name DFAS, which typically denotes a focus on artificial intelligence and semiconductors, shows significant alignment with its top holdings when examining specific tickers like AMKR, AEIS, ONTO, and IESC. These companies operate within the semiconductor equipment and materials sectors, directly supporting the supply chain for AI hardware development rather than acting as unrelated broad-market names. While several holdings in the provided list are categorized without a sector or labeled differently, such as TTMI, WCC, MOD, JAZZ, BWA, APA, and IESC, their presence suggests a diversified approach that may include companies benefiting from digital transformation across various industries rather than strict exposure to just one sub-sector. The inclusion of firms like AEIS in Industrials and ONTO in Technology indicates an effort to capture the broader ecosystem required for AI infrastructure, even if some classifications appear ambiguous or data is incomplete regarding their primary business focus relative to the theme.

Sector coherence appears limited by the extremely low weightings assigned to each category, with no single sector exceeding 0.3% of the portfolio and a top-10 concentration of only 2.8%. This structure suggests that while the fund attempts thematic exposure through specific chip-related names, it lacks the concentrated positioning often seen in pure-play AI or semiconductor ETFs, potentially diluting the purity of the theme with smaller allocations to unrelated sectors like Energy and Consumer Cyclical. The minimal sector weights imply that the fund's performance will be heavily influenced by its ability to identify niche players within these tiny baskets rather than riding broad industry trends, creating a profile distinct from standard market indices but also offering less direct correlation to the dominant forces driving the AI narrative compared to more concentrated thematic vehicles.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 11:45:47.711562+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation profile of DFAS presents an extreme lack of exposure to broad equity markets, with the fund holding negligible positions across major economic drivers. Technology and Industrials sectors each account for a mere 0.3% of assets, while Consumer Cyclical and Energy are similarly underrepresented at 0.2%. This structural distribution suggests that the investment thesis is fundamentally detached from traditional market-cap weighted strategies or sector-specific growth narratives. Instead, the portfolio appears designed to isolate specific micro-cap characteristics rather than capture broad industry trends, effectively neutralizing standard factor tilts toward large-cap value or growth styles found in conventional equity indices.

The concentration risk profile reveals a highly idiosyncratic approach where individual stock selection outweighs any sectoral logic. With the top ten holdings collectively representing only 2.8% of total assets and each of the five largest positions capped at 0.3%, the fund demonstrates an intense focus on single-name exposure rather than diversified sector bets. This structure implies that performance will be driven almost exclusively by the idiosyncratic movements of these specific small-cap entities, such as AMKR or WCC, rather than macroeconomic shifts within their respective industries. The minimal weighting in any given sector indicates that the fund's strategy prioritizes granular stock-level attributes over broad-based industrial cycles, resulting in a portfolio where traditional diversification benefits are largely absent due to the sheer scarcity of holdings across all sectors.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-20 09:14:20.743477+00

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

35.7x
Weighted P/E
5.71x
Weighted P/B
1.02%
Dividend Yield
$13B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

010002000300040001
Well Diversified
Top 5: 1.4%Top 10: 2.6%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Growth

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other59.5%Technology12.2%Industrials10.5%Consumer Cyclical8.9%Energy8.9%
Visualization Mode

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+28.7%
ETF 1Y Return
+36.8%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-8.1%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

DFAS is up 28.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +36.8%. Despite earnings growth, valuations have contracted by 8.1% — the market is paying less per dollar of earnings than a year ago.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 3% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration2.8%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1AMKR
Amkor Technology Inc
Technology
0.34%
44.4x
2TTMI
TTM Technologies Inc
0.34%
53.8x7/9
3AEIS
Advanced Energy Industries Inc
Industrials
0.29%
79.0x6/9
4WCC
WESCO International Inc
0.29%
19.9x3/9
5MOD
Modine Manufacturing Co
0.28%
123.4x8/9
6ONTO
Onto Innovation Inc
0.26%
69.7x3/9
7BWA
BorgWarner Inc
Consumer Cyclical
0.25%
41.5x6/9
8JAZZ
Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC
0.25%
1929.6x
9APA
APA Corp
Energy
0.25%
8.5x6/9
10IESC
IES Holdings Inc
0.25%
36.0x

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how DFAS’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

10 holdings · 2.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AMKR0.34%
2TTMI0.34%
3AEIS0.29%
4WCC0.29%
5MOD0.28%
6ONTO0.26%
7BWA0.25%
8APA0.25%
9JAZZ0.25%
10IESC0.25%

2026-05-23

10 holdings · 2.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AMKR0.34%
2TTMI0.34%
3AEIS0.29%
4WCC0.29%
5MOD0.28%
6ONTO0.26%
7BWA0.25%
8APA0.25%
9JAZZ0.25%
10IESC0.25%

2026-05-22

10 holdings · 2.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AMKR0.34%
2TTMI0.34%
3AEIS0.29%
4WCC0.29%
5MOD0.28%
6ONTO0.26%
7BWA0.25%
8APA0.25%
9JAZZ0.25%
10IESC0.25%

2026-05-21

10 holdings · 2.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AMKR0.34%
2TTMI0.34%
3AEIS0.29%
4WCC0.29%
5MOD0.28%
6ONTO0.26%
7BWA0.25%
8APA0.25%
9JAZZ0.25%
10IESC0.25%

2026-05-20

10 holdings · 2.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AMKR0.34%
2TTMI0.34%
3AEIS0.29%
4WCC0.29%
5MOD0.28%
6ONTO0.26%
7BWA0.25%
8APA0.25%
9JAZZ0.25%
10IESC0.25%

2026-05-19

10 holdings · 2.8% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AMKR0.34%
2TTMI0.34%
3AEIS0.29%
4WCC0.29%
5MOD0.28%
6ONTO0.26%
7BWA0.25%
8APA0.25%
9JAZZ0.25%
10IESC0.25%

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

21.0%
Annual Volatility
1.39
Sharpe (1Y)
0.55
Sharpe (3Y)
-26.1%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-26.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove DFAS Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:+0.66%(2026-06-02)

Top Contributors

+0.012%
+0.003%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

The current price of $75.84 for DFAS sits within a context where the immediate trend lacks definitive directional confirmation without additional technical layers, creating an environment where momentum appears susceptible to rapid reversals rather than being structurally entrenched. While no specific drawdown metrics or volatility measures are provided in this isolated snapshot, the absence of broader supporting data suggests that any observed upward movement could be fragile and highly sensitive to external market shifts or fundamental reassessments. In such a vacuum, price action often reflects speculative positioning rather than deep-value realization, meaning that short-term fluctuations may disproportionately impact equity value without indicating a sustainable long-term trajectory. From a risk dynamics perspective, the singular data point implies a high degree of uncertainty regarding the asset's stability against adverse market conditions. Without evidence of widening stop-losses or stabilizing volume profiles to corroborate price levels, the setup suggests that downside protection mechanisms are not currently visible in this limited view. Consequently, the potential for sharp corrections remains significant if underlying fundamentals fail to materialize as anticipated by current market participants. The technical picture here is one of ambiguity where the distinction between genuine strength and temporary liquidity-driven spikes becomes difficult to discern without further historical context or corroborating indicators.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How DFAS’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2455 snapshots
Other59.5%
Technology12.2%
Industrials10.5%
Consumer Cyclical8.9%
Energy8.9%
Change since 2026-03-31
Healthcare
-18.2%
Technology
+12.2%
Industrials
-9.0%
Consumer Cyclical
+8.9%
Energy
+8.9%
Other
-2.7%
2026-03-312026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.