ETF · Broad Market

IYM(IYM)

$173.94
-0.67%
Expense Ratio
$1.2B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
82.4%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector tilt towards Basic Materials is quite pronounced, accounting for nearly two-thirds of its allocation. This concentration in commodities-related stocks suggests that the fund may be more sensitive to fluctuations in raw material prices and supply chain disruptions. Geographically, it appears to have a global scope, given the presence of international companies like NEM and AU.

The top holdings reveal a notable single-stock dominance by LIN, which accounts for nearly one-fifth of the portfolio's value. This concentration risk may be worth monitoring, particularly if LIN experiences any significant volatility. Compared to the broader market, the sector mix skews towards Basic Materials, which is more cyclical in nature. A favorable macro environment would likely involve strong demand for commodities and a stable supply chain, while an unfavorable scenario could be characterized by declining commodity prices or supply disruptions.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 09:45:19.076476+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 92/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker IYM is a pure-play exposure to gold miners, yet the underlying portfolio reveals a significant thematic divergence. While the fund holds several names often associated with precious metals like Newmont and Freeport-McMoRan, these constitute only a fraction of the total assets under management alongside major industrial producers such as Linde and Ecolab. The dominance of Basic Materials companies that operate primarily in chemicals, fertilizers, or steel rather than gold extraction suggests the fund relies heavily on broad sector names to maintain stability rather than adhering strictly to a bullion-focused mandate. This structural composition indicates that while some holdings align with traditional mining expectations, the majority of capital is deployed across the wider materials complex, diluting the specific thematic purity one might anticipate from a dedicated precious metals vehicle.

Sector concentration presents both cohesion and risk within this framework. With Basic Materials comprising over 62% of the portfolio and Industrials making up less than 4%, the allocation remains tightly clustered around a single broad industry group rather than diversifying across energy, technology, or consumer sectors often seen in thematic funds. However, the top ten holdings account for approximately two-thirds of total assets, creating a high concentration risk where performance is heavily dependent on the fortunes of a few large-cap entities like Linde and Newmont. This lack of differentiation from a standard materials index means the fund does not offer unique exposure to specific mining sub-sectors or geographic regions typically sought by investors targeting gold miners specifically. The sector weights are internally consistent but fail to distinguish the portfolio from general market benchmarks, suggesting the vehicle serves as a concentrated materials proxy rather than a specialized thematic play on precious metals.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 22:49:58.313258+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of IYM presents a highly concentrated exposure to the Basic Materials industry, which accounts for 62.1% of total assets within just nine holdings. This overwhelming focus suggests an investment thesis centered squarely on commodities and resource extraction rather than a diversified approach across multiple economic sectors. The remaining Industrials allocation represents a negligible fraction at 3.9%, indicating that the fund does not aim to capture broad industrial growth but instead isolates specific drivers within the materials space, such as mining and chemical production.

This structural design creates significant concentration risk, evidenced by the top ten holdings comprising 66.0% of the portfolio's value. The dominance of individual positions like LIN at nearly 20%, followed closely by NEM and FCX, implies that the fund's performance will be disproportionately sensitive to price fluctuations in specific commodities or corporate developments within these single entities. Such a tight clustering means that adverse events affecting even one major holding could materially impact the overall portfolio trajectory more severely than in a broadly diversified vehicle.

Furthermore, the composition reveals a distinct tilt toward large-cap leaders with established market positions rather than small-cap growth or value factors derived from sector breadth. The heavy weighting of companies like ECL and APD alongside pure-play miners indicates an emphasis on firms capable of navigating cyclical commodity markets through scale. Consequently, while this allocation offers targeted exposure to the resource complex, it lacks the diversification buffers typically found in balanced equity strategies, leaving returns highly correlated with the specific performance dynamics of the materials sector and its largest constituents.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 00:17:07.863195+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share IYM's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of IYM's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
VONEVONE$10B1067.9%
ONEOONEO$25M1067.9%
SPTMSPTM$12B964.5%
VTIVanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF Shares$2.1T0.03%964.5%
QUSQUS$1B861.5%

68% of IYM's portfolio by weight is also held by VONE, which commands 8× more assets under management. When VONE receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging IYM's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofIYM's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

24.8x
Weighted P/E
5.85x
Weighted P/B
$122B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000752
Well Diversified
Top 5: 50.4%Top 10: 67.9%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Basic Materials89.0%Industrials11.0%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
68% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
Low Risk

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
5%
0–3 Weak
43%
4–6 Average
20%
7–9 Strong

Based on 68% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
52%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
1.01%
TTM Yield
Safe
Dividend Durability
52% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside IYM collectively pay out 52% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 59% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+21.7%
ETF 1Y Return
+22.1%
Wtd Earnings Growth
-0.4%
Multiple Contraction
Earnings

IYM is up 21.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +22.1%. Price performance is closely aligned with fundamental earnings growth — valuations are roughly unchanged.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 68% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of IYM's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

71% Creators
29% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)48.1%
Value Destroyers19.8%

Of IYM's analyzed weight, 71% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 29% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 68% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Concentration Risk Monitor

CRITICAL
21.8%
Largest Holding
LIN
39.1%
Top 3 Weight
13
Effective # of Stocks
63%
Top Stock Var. Share
Portfolio weight concentration
LIN
NEM
FCX
ECL
Other 5 stocks

LIN at 21.8% has captured IYM's portfolio. The top 3 holdings (39%) dominate the fund's variance — the remaining 7 stocks provide minimal diversification.IYM effectively behaves like a 13-stock portfolio, not a 10-stock one.

Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

39/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership11.8%
Most Crowded HoldingFAST (21.3%)
Least CrowdedAU (0.3%)
Coverage68% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

IYM has a Passive Crowding Score of 39/100. On average, 11.8% of the market capitalization of IYM's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 20 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration67.9%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1LIN
Linde PLC
Basic Materials
21.76%
34.5x5/9
2NEM
Newmont Corp
Basic Materials
9.12%
11.8x9/9
3FCX
Freeport-McMoRan Inc
Basic Materials
8.24%
30.9x6/9
4ECL
Ecolab Inc
Basic Materials
6.37%
37.3x5/9
5APD
Air Products and Chemicals Inc
Basic Materials
4.88%
31.3x3/9
6FAST
Fastenal Co
Industrials
4.44%
39.9x7/9
7NUE
Nucor Corp
Basic Materials
3.86%
23.4x5/9
8AU
Anglogold Ashanti PLC
Basic Materials
3.42%
11.2x8/9
9CRS
Carpenter Technology Corp
Industrials
3.04%
58.5x7/9
10STLD
Steel Dynamics Inc
Basic Materials
2.81%
25.2x4/9

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how IYM’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-19

10 holdings · 67.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN21.76%
2NEM9.12%
3FCX8.24%
4ECL6.37%
5APD4.88%
6FAST4.44%
7NUE3.86%
8AU3.42%
9CRS3.04%
10STLD2.81%

2026-07-18

10 holdings · 67.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN21.76%
2NEM9.12%
3FCX8.24%
4ECL6.37%
5APD4.88%
6FAST4.44%
7NUE3.86%
8AU3.42%
9CRS3.04%
10STLD2.81%

2026-07-17

10 holdings · 67.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN21.76%
2NEM9.12%
3FCX8.24%
4ECL6.37%
5APD4.88%
6FAST4.44%
7NUE3.86%
8AU3.42%
9CRS3.04%
10STLD2.81%

2026-07-16

10 holdings · 67.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN21.76%
2NEM9.12%
3FCX8.24%
4ECL6.37%
5APD4.88%
6FAST4.44%
7NUE3.86%
8AU3.42%
9CRS3.04%
10STLD2.81%

2026-07-15

10 holdings · 67.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN21.76%
2NEM9.12%
3FCX8.24%
4ECL6.37%
5APD4.88%
6FAST4.44%
7NUE3.86%
8AU3.42%
9CRS3.04%
10STLD2.81%

2026-07-14

10 holdings · 67.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1LIN21.76%
2NEM9.12%
3FCX8.24%
4ECL6.37%
5APD4.88%
6FAST4.44%
7NUE3.86%
8AU3.42%
9CRS3.04%
10STLD2.81%

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

20.4%
Annual Volatility
0.91
Sharpe (1Y)
0.37
Sharpe (3Y)
-23.6%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-29.9%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove IYM Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:-0.67%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.018%
+0.018%
+0.015%

Top Detractors

-0.112%
-0.113%
-0.314%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Technical Setup

AI Generated

At $181.64, the current trading price of IYM sits within a defined technical context that invites analysis regarding its proximity to moving average envelopes. While specific envelope boundaries are not explicitly detailed in the provided data, this price point represents a snapshot relative to historical trend lines where mean-reversion strategies often look for deviations from the mean. If this level is significantly detached from long-term averages, it may suggest potential volatility as prices gravitate back toward central tendency; conversely, if it aligns closely with recent moving average clusters, it could indicate sustained momentum rather than an imminent reversal. The positioning of price relative to these statistical bands serves primarily as a gauge for market sentiment extremes. A substantial gap between the current quote and upper or lower envelope limits typically precedes corrective movements in technical theory, whereas tight adherence suggests ongoing trend integrity. Observers might note that without additional data on volume spikes or broader index correlation, isolating pure mean-reversion probability at this specific juncture requires caution. The $181.64 figure alone does not confirm a breakout or breakdown but rather establishes the baseline from which relative strength or weakness against established averages can be inferred by comparing it to prior price distributions. Ultimately, the technical setup highlights the importance of context when evaluating whether current valuations are stretched or compressed compared to recent norms. Traders monitoring this instrument would likely focus on how quickly prices react if they test key support and resistance levels implied by these moving average structures. The absence

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

1.01%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How IYM’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1994 snapshots
Basic Materials89.0%
Industrials11.0%
Change since 2026-03-30
Industrials
+5.5%
Basic Materials
-5.5%
2026-03-302026-07-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.