ETF · Broad Market

SPYV(SPYV)

$61.92
-0.51%
Expense Ratio
$31.8B
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Moderate
0%20%60%100%
42.2%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation reveals a significant tilt towards growth-oriented sectors, with Technology and Financial Services accounting for nearly 35% of the total allocation. This suggests that the fund is positioned to benefit from companies that are driving innovation and profitability in their respective industries. The presence of large-cap technology giants like AAPL and AMZN underscores this focus on high-growth areas.

The top holdings further reinforce this narrative, with Apple's 7.9% weighting making it a dominant position within the portfolio. This concentration risk may be worth monitoring for investors who prefer more diversified exposure. Compared to the broader market, the sector mix appears to have a slightly higher bias towards Technology and Financial Services, which could make it more sensitive to changes in these sectors' performance. A favorable environment for this portfolio might include sustained growth in technology spending or continued strength in financial markets, while an unfavorable scenario could involve a decline in consumer spending or increased regulatory scrutiny of the tech industry.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-07-14 07:51:48.43489+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 15/100

The investment theme implied by the ticker SPYV suggests a specific value or dividend-focused strategy, yet the actual portfolio composition reveals significant misalignment with that branding. The top holdings are dominated by mega-cap technology and consumer cyclical giants such as Apple, Amazon, and Tesla, which often trade at premium valuations rather than offering traditional deep-value characteristics. Furthermore, the inclusion of major energy players like ExxonMobil alongside broad market leaders indicates a reliance on established industry titans to anchor returns, potentially using well-known names to stabilize performance instead of adhering strictly to a narrow thematic screen. This blend suggests the fund may be leveraging recognizable large-cap stocks for liquidity and stability rather than maintaining a pure focus on undervalued or specific sector-based opportunities that would typically define such an investment theme.

Sector coherence further questions the distinctiveness of this portfolio compared to a broad market index, as the weightings closely mirror the overall S&P 500 distribution across technology, financial services, and healthcare. The heavy allocation to these sectors, combined with a top-ten concentration that remains relatively moderate at nearly 25%, points toward a structure designed for general market exposure rather than specialized thematic differentiation. While the sector breakdown covers diverse industries including industrials and utilities, the presence of such ubiquitous mega-caps in every major category dilutes any potential edge or unique risk profile associated with a value-oriented strategy. Consequently, the fund appears to function more as a diversified large-cap proxy that happens to carry a specific ticker designation, lacking the structural purity expected from funds claiming a focused investment mandate based on valuation metrics alone.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 01:05:54.717448+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of SPYV reveals a distinct tilt toward growth-oriented industries, with Technology and Financial Services comprising nearly one-third of the portfolio. This heavy weighting in sectors historically associated with capital appreciation suggests an investment thesis focused on long-term equity market expansion rather than income generation or defensive stability. The presence of significant positions in Consumer Cyclical and Industrials further reinforces this aggressive stance, as these categories often correlate strongly with economic upturns but may underperform during periods of recessionary pressure. While the fund maintains exposure to Healthcare and Energy, their combined weight remains moderate compared to the dominant growth sectors, indicating a balanced yet forward-looking approach rather than a purely cyclical or defensive strategy.

Concentration risk is notably elevated within this structure, driven primarily by the top five holdings which account for over 24% of assets under management. The substantial single-name exposure to major technology and consumer giants amplifies idiosyncratic risks associated with those specific companies while simultaneously boosting potential returns if their trajectories remain favorable. This lack of diversification across individual securities contrasts with a broad market index approach, where such large-cap weights are typically diluted by hundreds of smaller constituents. The fund's reliance on a limited number of high-impact stocks means that performance will be heavily influenced by the operational success or regulatory challenges facing these specific leaders rather than broader sector trends alone.

Factor tilts implied by this composition suggest an exposure to size and momentum factors, as the portfolio is dominated by large-cap names with significant market influence. The underweighting in Utilities, Real Estate, and Basic Materials further diminishes defensive characteristics that typically provide stability during volatile markets or rising interest rate environments. Consequently, the fund's behavior may diverge significantly from a traditional broad-market benchmark, offering higher volatility profiles aligned with growth momentum rather than value or income objectives. Investors analyzing this allocation must weigh the potential for outsized gains against the heightened sensitivity to sector-specific downturns and individual stock performance.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 04:53:26.655919+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share SPYV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of SPYV's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPTMSPTM$12B43999.8%
SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust$640B0.09%43999.8%
SPLGSPLG$97B42798.2%
QUSQUS$1B38998.0%
VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF$1.5T0.03%43397.8%

100% of SPYV's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging SPYV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofSPYV's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

24.2x
Weighted P/E
11.58x
Weighted P/B
$699B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 97% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000130
Well Diversified
Top 5: 17.4%Top 10: 24.1%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Large Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Technology20.0%Financial Services15.3%Healthcare11.9%Consumer Cyclical10.4%Industrials9.9%Consumer Defensive8.9%Energy7.0%Utilities4.4%Basic Materials3.3%Communication Services2.9%Other2.8%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
83% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
6%
0–3 Weak
52%
4–6 Average
26%
7–9 Strong

Based on 83% of fund weight with Piotroski data.

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
68%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
1.46%
TTM Yield
Safe
Dividend Durability
68% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside SPYV collectively pay out 68% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 63% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+18.8%
ETF 1Y Return
+16.2%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+2.6%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

SPYV is up 18.8% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +16.2%. The remaining +2.6% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 83% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of SPYV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

59% Creators
41% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)44.5%
Value Destroyers30.7%

Of SPYV's analyzed weight, 59% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 41% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 75% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Concentration Risk Monitor

ELEVATED
8.2%
Largest Holding
AAPL
14.2%
Top 3 Weight
77
Effective # of Stocks
52%
Top Stock Var. Share
Portfolio weight concentration
AAPL
Other 45 stocks

SPYV's top holding AAPL at 8.2% is above the 8% elevated-concentration threshold. The effective number of stocks is 77 vs. the actual count of 50.

Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

38/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership11.3%
Most Crowded HoldingSNPS (16.8%)
Least CrowdedDELL (4.7%)
Coverage66% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

SPYV has a Passive Crowding Score of 38/100. On average, 11.3% of the market capitalization of SPYV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 45 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration24.1%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1AAPL
APPLE INC
Technology
8.25%
40.3x8/9
2AMZN
AMAZON.COM INC
Consumer Cyclical
3.87%
29.9x6/9
3XOM
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP
Energy
2.04%
24.8x5/9
4WMT
WALMART INC
Consumer Defensive
1.70%
40.5x7/9
5INTC
INTEL CORP
Technology
1.54%
6/9
6COST
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP
Consumer Defensive
1.41%
47.6x6/9
7TSLA
TESLA INC
Consumer Cyclical
1.41%
349.4x5/9
8BAC
BANK OF AMERICA CORP
Financial Services
1.35%
14.2x5/9
9UNH
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
Healthcare
1.30%
31.8x6/9
10PG
PROCTER + GAMBLE CO/THE
Consumer Defensive
1.19%
22.2x6/9
11HD
HOME DEPOT INC
Consumer Cyclical
1.17%
24.7x4/9
12CVX
CHEVRON CORP
Energy
1.16%
32.0x6/9
13MRK
MERCK + CO. INC.
Healthcare
1.06%
36.0x4/9
14JPM
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO
Financial Services
0.99%
14.7x3/9
15V
VISA INC CLASS A SHARES
Financial Services
0.92%
31.8x6/9
The bottom 424 stocks in SPYV account for only 70.6% of the total fund weight.Only the top 50 holdings are shown. Total holdings: 439.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how SPYV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-19

15 holdings · 29.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AAPL8.25%8,968,502
2AMZN3.87%5,618,839
3XOM2.04%5,062,220
4WMT1.70%5,354,266
5INTC1.54%5,769,919
6COST1.41%541,857
7TSLA1.41%1,306,573
8BAC1.35%7,973,915
9UNH1.30%1,109,134
10PG1.19%2,844,012
11HD1.17%1,216,501
12CVX1.16%2,286,510
13MRK1.06%3,016,508
14JPM0.99%1,047,250
15V0.92%912,195

2026-07-18

15 holdings · 29.4% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AAPL8.25%8,968,502
2AMZN3.87%5,618,839
3XOM2.04%5,062,220
4WMT1.70%5,354,266
5INTC1.54%5,769,919
6COST1.41%541,857
7TSLA1.41%1,306,573
8BAC1.35%7,973,915
9UNH1.30%1,109,134
10PG1.19%2,844,012
11HD1.17%1,216,501
12CVX1.16%2,286,510
13MRK1.06%3,016,508
14JPM0.99%1,047,250
15V0.92%912,195

2026-07-17

15 holdings · 29.5% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AAPL8.18%8,966,960
2AMZN3.99%5,617,873
3XOM2.04%5,061,350
4WMT1.68%5,353,346
5INTC1.65%5,768,927
6TSLA1.44%1,306,349
7COST1.38%541,763
8BAC1.37%7,972,543
9UNH1.29%1,108,944
10PG1.17%2,843,522
11HD1.16%1,216,291
12CVX1.16%2,286,116
13MRK1.04%3,015,990
14JPM1.01%1,047,070
15TXN0.93%1,111,381

2026-07-16

15 holdings · 29.2% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AAPL7.88%8,954,624
2AMZN3.88%5,610,145
3XOM2.05%5,054,390
4INTC1.73%5,760,991
5WMT1.70%5,345,986
6TSLA1.44%1,304,557
7COST1.39%541,011
8BAC1.35%7,961,567
9UNH1.32%1,107,424
10CVX1.16%2,282,964
11PG1.16%2,839,602
12HD1.15%1,214,611
13MRK1.02%3,011,846
14JPM1.00%1,045,630
15TXN0.95%1,109,845

2026-07-15

15 holdings · 29.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AAPL7.90%8,953,853
2AMZN3.86%5,609,662
3XOM2.03%5,053,955
4WMT1.71%5,345,526
5INTC1.65%5,760,495
6TSLA1.43%1,304,445
7COST1.39%540,964
8UNH1.32%1,107,329
9BAC1.32%7,960,881
10PG1.17%2,839,357
11CVX1.16%2,282,767
12HD1.14%1,214,506
13MRK1.04%3,011,587
14JPM0.97%1,045,540
15TXN0.92%1,109,749

2026-07-14

15 holdings · 29.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1AAPL7.87%8,959,250
2AMZN3.84%5,613,043
3XOM1.96%5,057,000
4INTC1.76%5,763,967
5WMT1.70%5,348,746
6TSLA1.48%1,305,229
7COST1.38%541,293
8BAC1.32%7,965,683
9UNH1.31%1,107,994
10PG1.16%2,841,072
11HD1.16%1,215,241
12CVX1.12%2,284,146
13MRK1.04%3,013,400
14JPM0.98%1,046,170
15TXN0.96%1,110,421

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

14.2%
Annual Volatility
1.33
Sharpe (1Y)
0.74
Sharpe (3Y)
-17.5%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-17.9%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove SPYV Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:-0.51%(2026-07-17)

Top Contributors

+0.022%
+0.022%
+0.020%

Top Detractors

-0.031%
-0.037%
-0.041%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

1.46%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How SPYV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-1994 snapshots
Technology20.0%
Financial Services15.3%
Healthcare11.9%
Consumer Cyclical10.4%
Industrials9.9%
Consumer Defensive8.9%
Energy7.0%
Utilities4.4%
Real Estate3.4%
Basic Materials3.3%
Communication Services2.9%
Other2.8%
0.0%
Change since 2026-03-30
Technology
+3.2%
Energy
-1.7%
Consumer Defensive
-1.0%
Financial Services
+0.7%
Communication Services
-0.7%
Other
+0.5%
2026-03-302026-07-19

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-17.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.