SPYV(SPYV)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe SPYV ETF, managing approximately $31.8 billion in assets, exhibits a distinct sector tilt heavily weighted toward technology and financial services. With technology comprising over 20% of the portfolio, it stands as the single largest exposure, significantly outpacing healthcare at roughly 11%. This concentration is driven by substantial individual positions in major industry leaders; Apple alone accounts for nearly 8% of total assets, while Amazon contributes an additional 4.3%, creating a pronounced reliance on large-cap technology and consumer cyclical equities. The top ten holdings collectively represent a significant portion of the fund's value, indicating that performance will be closely correlated with the fortunes of these specific mega-caps rather than being broadly diversified across mid-tier companies within their respective sectors.
Geographically, while explicit country breakdowns are not provided in the data, the composition of the top holdings suggests a heavy inclination toward U.S.-listed large-cap enterprises, particularly given the dominance of Apple and Amazon relative to other global peers like Exxon Mobil or Chevron. The inclusion of energy giants such as XOM and CVX alongside consumer staples like Walmart introduces some defensive characteristics, yet these positions are dwarfed by the weight of technology and financial names. Financial services round out nearly 15% of the allocation, further anchoring the portfolio in domestic economic drivers. Quantitatively, the fund's structure implies a strategy focused on capturing returns from established market leaders rather than seeking exposure to emerging markets or small-cap growth stocks. The sheer scale of asset management combined with this specific sector and holding concentration suggests a vehicle designed for investors targeting high-beta large-cap performance within the United States equity landscape.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 09:30:18.463753+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 15/100The investment theme implied by the ticker SPYV suggests a specific value or dividend-focused strategy, yet the actual portfolio composition reveals significant misalignment with that branding. The top holdings are dominated by mega-cap technology and consumer cyclical giants such as Apple, Amazon, and Tesla, which often trade at premium valuations rather than offering traditional deep-value characteristics. Furthermore, the inclusion of major energy players like ExxonMobil alongside broad market leaders indicates a reliance on established industry titans to anchor returns, potentially using well-known names to stabilize performance instead of adhering strictly to a narrow thematic screen. This blend suggests the fund may be leveraging recognizable large-cap stocks for liquidity and stability rather than maintaining a pure focus on undervalued or specific sector-based opportunities that would typically define such an investment theme.
Sector coherence further questions the distinctiveness of this portfolio compared to a broad market index, as the weightings closely mirror the overall S&P 500 distribution across technology, financial services, and healthcare. The heavy allocation to these sectors, combined with a top-ten concentration that remains relatively moderate at nearly 25%, points toward a structure designed for general market exposure rather than specialized thematic differentiation. While the sector breakdown covers diverse industries including industrials and utilities, the presence of such ubiquitous mega-caps in every major category dilutes any potential edge or unique risk profile associated with a value-oriented strategy. Consequently, the fund appears to function more as a diversified large-cap proxy that happens to carry a specific ticker designation, lacking the structural purity expected from funds claiming a focused investment mandate based on valuation metrics alone.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 01:05:54.717448+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of SPYV reveals a distinct tilt toward growth-oriented industries, with Technology and Financial Services comprising nearly one-third of the portfolio. This heavy weighting in sectors historically associated with capital appreciation suggests an investment thesis focused on long-term equity market expansion rather than income generation or defensive stability. The presence of significant positions in Consumer Cyclical and Industrials further reinforces this aggressive stance, as these categories often correlate strongly with economic upturns but may underperform during periods of recessionary pressure. While the fund maintains exposure to Healthcare and Energy, their combined weight remains moderate compared to the dominant growth sectors, indicating a balanced yet forward-looking approach rather than a purely cyclical or defensive strategy.
Concentration risk is notably elevated within this structure, driven primarily by the top five holdings which account for over 24% of assets under management. The substantial single-name exposure to major technology and consumer giants amplifies idiosyncratic risks associated with those specific companies while simultaneously boosting potential returns if their trajectories remain favorable. This lack of diversification across individual securities contrasts with a broad market index approach, where such large-cap weights are typically diluted by hundreds of smaller constituents. The fund's reliance on a limited number of high-impact stocks means that performance will be heavily influenced by the operational success or regulatory challenges facing these specific leaders rather than broader sector trends alone.
Factor tilts implied by this composition suggest an exposure to size and momentum factors, as the portfolio is dominated by large-cap names with significant market influence. The underweighting in Utilities, Real Estate, and Basic Materials further diminishes defensive characteristics that typically provide stability during volatile markets or rising interest rate environments. Consequently, the fund's behavior may diverge significantly from a traditional broad-market benchmark, offering higher volatility profiles aligned with growth momentum rather than value or income objectives. Investors analyzing this allocation must weigh the potential for outsized gains against the heightened sensitivity to sector-specific downturns and individual stock performance.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 04:53:26.655919+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share SPYV's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of SPYV's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPYState Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust | $640B | 0.09% | 440 | 99.8% |
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 440 | 99.8% |
| VOOVanguard S&P 500 ETF | $1.5T | 0.03% | 433 | 99.6% |
| SPLGSPLG | $97B | — | 431 | 98.7% |
| QUSQUS | $1B | — | 397 | 98.3% |
100% of SPYV's portfolio by weight is also held by SPY, which commands 20× more assets under management. When SPY receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging SPYV's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofSPYV's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 96% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 84% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside SPYV collectively pay out 69% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This is a sustainable payout level with moderate room for dividend growth. Based on 62% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietarySPYV is up 21.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +14.7%. The remaining +7.0% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 83% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of SPYV's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of SPYV's analyzed weight, 64% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 36% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 77% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
SPYV has a Passive Crowding Score of 39/100. On average, 11.8% of the market capitalization of SPYV's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 43 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | APPLE INC Technology | 7.77% | 37.7x | 8/9 |
| 2 | AMZN | AMAZON.COM INC Consumer Cyclical | 4.28% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 3 | XOM | EXXON MOBIL CORP Energy | 2.25% | 24.5x | 5/9 |
| 4 | INTC | INTEL CORP Technology | 1.93% | — | 6/9 |
| 5 | WMT | WALMART INC Consumer Defensive | 1.84% | 40.8x | 7/9 |
| 6 | COST | COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP Consumer Defensive | 1.62% | 49.8x | 6/9 |
| 7 | TSLA | TESLA INC Consumer Cyclical | 1.55% | 399.8x | 5/9 |
| 8 | CVX | CHEVRON CORP Energy | 1.24% | 31.7x | 6/9 |
| 9 | UNH | UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC Healthcare | 1.20% | 28.7x | 6/9 |
| 10 | BAC | BANK OF AMERICA CORP Financial Services | 1.19% | 12.8x | 5/9 |
| 11 | PG | PROCTER + GAMBLE CO/THE Consumer Defensive | 1.16% | 21.0x | 6/9 |
| 12 | HD | HOME DEPOT INC Consumer Cyclical | 1.08% | 22.5x | 4/9 |
| 13 | MRK | MERCK + CO. INC. Healthcare | 1.00% | 33.4x | 4/9 |
| 14 | TXN | TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC Technology | 0.94% | 52.3x | 7/9 |
| 15 | JPM | JPMORGAN CHASE + CO Financial Services | 0.91% | 14.3x | 3/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how SPYV’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 29.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | 7.77% | 8,835,894 | — |
| 2 | AMZN | 4.28% | 5,526,633 | — |
| 3 | XOM | 2.25% | 5,030,469 | — |
| 4 | INTC | 1.93% | 5,652,008 | — |
| 5 | WMT | 1.84% | 5,276,752 | — |
| 6 | COST | 1.62% | 534,359 | — |
| 7 | TSLA | 1.55% | 1,286,486 | — |
| 8 | CVX | 1.24% | 2,256,475 | — |
| 9 | UNH | 1.20% | 1,090,390 | — |
| 10 | BAC | 1.19% | 7,987,693 | — |
| 11 | PG | 1.16% | 2,797,612 | — |
| 12 | HD | 1.08% | 1,198,428 | — |
| 13 | MRK | 1.00% | 2,987,857 | — |
| 14 | TXN | 0.94% | 1,092,529 | — |
| 15 | JPM | 0.91% | 1,038,665 | — |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 29.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | 7.77% | 8,835,894 | — |
| 2 | AMZN | 4.28% | 5,526,633 | — |
| 3 | XOM | 2.25% | 5,030,469 | — |
| 4 | INTC | 1.93% | 5,652,008 | — |
| 5 | WMT | 1.84% | 5,276,752 | — |
| 6 | COST | 1.62% | 534,359 | — |
| 7 | TSLA | 1.55% | 1,286,486 | — |
| 8 | CVX | 1.24% | 2,256,475 | — |
| 9 | UNH | 1.20% | 1,090,390 | — |
| 10 | BAC | 1.19% | 7,987,693 | — |
| 11 | PG | 1.16% | 2,797,612 | — |
| 12 | HD | 1.08% | 1,198,428 | — |
| 13 | MRK | 1.00% | 2,987,857 | — |
| 14 | TXN | 0.94% | 1,092,529 | — |
| 15 | JPM | 0.91% | 1,038,665 | — |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 30.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | 7.71% | 8,831,256 | — |
| 2 | AMZN | 4.23% | 5,523,735 | — |
| 3 | XOM | 2.27% | 5,027,829 | — |
| 4 | WMT | 1.99% | 5,273,980 | — |
| 5 | INTC | 1.94% | 5,649,044 | — |
| 6 | COST | 1.66% | 534,077 | — |
| 7 | TSLA | 1.55% | 1,285,808 | — |
| 8 | CVX | 1.25% | 2,255,293 | — |
| 9 | UNH | 1.21% | 1,089,820 | — |
| 10 | BAC | 1.18% | 7,983,499 | — |
| 11 | PG | 1.15% | 2,796,142 | — |
| 12 | HD | 1.07% | 1,197,798 | — |
| 13 | MRK | 0.97% | 2,986,291 | — |
| 14 | TXN | 0.96% | 1,091,953 | — |
| 15 | JPM | 0.91% | 1,038,119 | — |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 30.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | 7.67% | 8,791,833 | — |
| 2 | AMZN | 4.16% | 5,499,102 | — |
| 3 | XOM | 2.38% | 5,005,389 | — |
| 4 | WMT | 2.06% | 5,250,418 | — |
| 5 | INTC | 1.82% | 5,623,850 | — |
| 6 | COST | 1.70% | 531,680 | — |
| 7 | TSLA | 1.51% | 1,280,045 | — |
| 8 | CVX | 1.29% | 2,245,246 | — |
| 9 | UNH | 1.23% | 1,084,975 | — |
| 10 | BAC | 1.18% | 7,947,850 | — |
| 11 | PG | 1.15% | 2,783,647 | — |
| 12 | HD | 1.05% | 1,192,443 | — |
| 13 | MRK | 0.99% | 2,972,980 | — |
| 14 | TXN | 0.96% | 1,087,057 | — |
| 15 | JPM | 0.89% | 1,033,478 | — |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 29.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | 7.63% | 8,787,968 | — |
| 2 | AMZN | 4.24% | 5,496,687 | — |
| 3 | XOM | 2.34% | 5,003,189 | — |
| 4 | WMT | 2.04% | 5,248,113 | — |
| 5 | INTC | 1.77% | 5,621,380 | — |
| 6 | COST | 1.67% | 531,445 | — |
| 7 | TSLA | 1.53% | 1,279,485 | — |
| 8 | CVX | 1.27% | 2,244,261 | — |
| 9 | UNH | 1.24% | 1,084,500 | — |
| 10 | BAC | 1.17% | 7,944,360 | — |
| 11 | PG | 1.15% | 2,782,422 | — |
| 12 | HD | 1.04% | 1,191,918 | — |
| 13 | MRK | 0.97% | 2,971,675 | — |
| 14 | TXN | 0.95% | 1,086,577 | — |
| 15 | JPM | 0.91% | 1,033,023 | — |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 30.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL | 7.74% | 8,775,600 | — |
| 2 | AMZN | 4.26% | 5,488,959 | — |
| 3 | XOM | 2.32% | 4,996,149 | — |
| 4 | WMT | 2.02% | 5,240,737 | — |
| 5 | INTC | 1.79% | 5,613,476 | — |
| 6 | COST | 1.63% | 530,693 | — |
| 7 | TSLA | 1.58% | 1,277,693 | — |
| 8 | CVX | 1.26% | 2,241,109 | — |
| 9 | UNH | 1.25% | 1,082,980 | — |
| 10 | BAC | 1.16% | 7,933,192 | — |
| 11 | PG | 1.16% | 2,778,502 | — |
| 12 | HD | 1.04% | 1,190,238 | — |
| 13 | MRK | 0.97% | 2,967,499 | — |
| 14 | TXN | 0.96% | 1,085,041 | — |
| 15 | JPM | 0.90% | 1,031,567 | — |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove SPYV Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How SPYV’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.