VLUE(VLUE)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe VLUE ETF manages approximately $10.0 billion in assets and presents a distinct capital allocation profile characterized by significant exposure to large-cap value equities, with technology dominating the landscape at 31.4% of total holdings. This sector concentration is driven heavily by semiconductor and hardware giants; Microchip Technology alone accounts for over eleven percent of the portfolio, while Intel, Cisco, Applied Materials, Western Digital, and other tech names collectively reinforce this tilt despite the fund's broader value mandate. The presence of such a high weighting in technology suggests that the fund's performance will be intrinsically linked to the cyclical fortunes of these specific hardware manufacturers rather than representing a balanced exposure across all value sectors.
Geographically and regionally, while specific country weights are not provided, the holding list indicates a strong focus on established domestic or large multinational corporations within North America, given the prominence of US-based firms like General Motors in consumer cyclicals and Verizon and AT&T in communication services. The financial services component remains relatively modest at 3.8%, anchored by major institutions such as Citigroup and Bank of America, which serves to diversify away from pure tech volatility but does not shift the fund's core identity toward banking or insurance. Communication services contribute minimally at just over five percent, primarily through Verizon and AT&T, suggesting that media and telecom are viewed here strictly for their value characteristics rather than as a primary growth engine.
Quantitatively, the top ten holdings represent a substantial portion of the net asset value, with the four largest positions alone comprising nearly 30% of the fund's total weightings. This high degree of concentration in just a few mega-cap names implies that portfolio volatility may be closely tied to the earnings reports and macroeconomic sentiment surrounding these specific companies rather than being smoothed out by hundreds of smaller constituents. The inclusion of cyclical industrials like General Motors alongside heavyweights in semiconductors creates an overlap between growth-oriented technology trends and traditional value metrics, resulting in a hybrid risk profile that behaves differently from pure-play small-cap or mid-cap value indices.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-21 23:13:04.689995+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 65/100The investment theme implied by the name "VLUE," suggesting a focus on value-oriented equities, shows moderate alignment with its actual composition. The portfolio is heavily weighted toward mega-cap technology and communication service providers such as Microsoft, Intel, Cisco, and Verizon, which are often categorized based on their market capitalization rather than strict valuation metrics like low price-to-book or high dividend yields relative to growth peers. While these companies possess value characteristics in certain periods, the heavy reliance on dominant tech giants indicates that the fund may be capturing broad large-cap performance more than a distinct deep-value strategy. The presence of financial and consumer cyclical stocks supports a diversified approach, yet the overwhelming concentration within the technology sector suggests the portfolio's behavior might closely mirror general market trends rather than adhering strictly to a specific value discipline.
Sector coherence reveals significant overlap with broader market indices due to the dominance of large-cap names across multiple sectors. The 31.4% allocation to technology and the inclusion of major players in communications and finance create a profile that lacks clear differentiation from a standard broad-market benchmark, despite the thematic labeling. With top-ten holdings accounting for over 43% of assets under management, the fund exhibits substantial concentration risk tied specifically to the performance of these few large issuers rather than a diversified basket of undervalued small or mid-cap stocks typically associated with value strategies. This structural setup implies that returns will likely be driven by the aggregate movements of established industry leaders across various sectors, potentially diluting any intended exposure to distressed assets or out-of-favor companies that define traditional value investing.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 10:39:17.05523+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of VLUE presents a distinct anomaly relative to its valuation-focused mandate, characterized by an overwhelming concentration in the Technology sector which accounts for nearly one-third of total assets. This heavy weighting is further amplified by the top five holdings alone comprising over 43% of the portfolio's value, with semiconductor and hardware manufacturers like Micron and Intel dominating the landscape alongside Communication Services giant Cisco. Such a distribution suggests that while the fund aims to capture undervalued large-cap growth stocks, its current execution has resulted in significant exposure to cyclical tech equities rather than the traditional defensive or high-dividend sectors often associated with value strategies. The minimal representation of Financial Services and Consumer Cyclical sectors indicates a deliberate avoidance of these areas or a lack of sufficiently undervalued opportunities within them at this specific point in time, effectively narrowing the fund's thematic breadth beyond pure valuation metrics.
This structural composition introduces pronounced concentration risk, as the performance of the portfolio becomes highly sensitive to fluctuations in the semiconductor and broader technology markets rather than being diversified across multiple economic drivers. The reliance on just five major holdings for nearly half the asset base means that idiosyncratic risks associated with any single company or sub-sector could disproportionately impact overall returns, potentially undermining the intended risk-reduction benefits of a value-oriented approach. Furthermore, the heavy tilt toward capital-intensive technology firms may expose investors to elevated volatility and cyclical downturns more than a balanced value portfolio would typically experience, challenging the assumption that low valuations automatically equate to lower risk profiles when those assets are concentrated in growth-heavy industries.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 17:30:06.679273+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share VLUE's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of VLUE's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHVSCHV | $15B | — | 10 | 43.5% |
| IWDiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | $70B | — | 10 | 43.5% |
| ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF | $28B | — | 10 | 43.5% |
| QUSQUS | $1B | — | 10 | 43.5% |
| SCHXSCHX | $61B | — | 10 | 43.5% |
44% of VLUE's portfolio by weight is also held by SCHV. When SCHV receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging VLUE's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofVLUE's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 79% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 44% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside VLUE collectively pay out 35% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 30% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryVLUE is up 92.3% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +51.8%. The remaining +40.4% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 32% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of VLUE's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of VLUE's analyzed weight, 35% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 65% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 40% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Concentration Risk Monitor
ELEVATEDVLUE's top holding MU at 11.6% is above the 8% elevated-concentration threshold. The effective number of stocks is 34 vs. the actual count of 10.
Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
VLUE has a Passive Crowding Score of 33/100. On average, 10.0% of the market capitalization of VLUE's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates moderate passive ownership density. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption activity can amplify short-term volatility in the underlying holdings.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 37 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 10 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MU | Micron Technology Inc Technology | 11.62% | 45.9x | 7/9 |
| 2 | INTC | Intel Corp Technology | 9.28% | — | 6/9 |
| 3 | CSCO | Cisco Systems Inc Technology | 4.90% | 40.1x | 8/9 |
| 4 | AMAT | Applied Materials Inc Technology | 3.67% | 42.4x | 6/9 |
| 5 | GM | General Motors Co Consumer Cyclical | 3.15% | 30.4x | 5/9 |
| 6 | VZ | Verizon Communications Inc Communication Services | 2.66% | 11.7x | 5/9 |
| 7 | T | AT&T Inc Communication Services | 2.53% | 8.2x | 6/9 |
| 8 | C | Citigroup Inc Financial Services | 1.94% | 15.5x | 2/9 |
| 9 | WDC | Western Digital Corp Technology | 1.89% | 31.8x | 6/9 |
| 10 | BAC | Bank of America Corp Financial Services | 1.88% | 12.8x | 5/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how VLUE’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
10 holdings · 43.5% tracked weight2026-05-23
10 holdings · 43.5% tracked weight2026-05-22
10 holdings · 43.5% tracked weight2026-05-21
10 holdings · 43.5% tracked weight2026-05-20
10 holdings · 43.5% tracked weightSource: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove VLUE Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How VLUE’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.