XTL(XTL)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards Technology, with nearly 38% of assets dedicated to this space. This is complemented by a notable presence in Other sectors, which comprise approximately 45% of the fund's holdings. Communication Services accounts for a smaller portion, around 18%. The market-cap profile is not explicitly stated, but given the sector breakdown and top holdings, it appears to be skewed towards mid-to-large cap names.
The concentration risk is elevated due to the presence of several large positions, with CIEN being the largest holding at 3.6% of assets. ANET, EXTR, VIAV, VISN, LITE, LUMN, CSCO, GSAT, and FFIV also comprise a significant portion of the portfolio, with each name accounting for around 3-4% of assets. The sector mix diverges from the broader market, which is likely to be influenced by these Technology and Other sector allocations. A favorable macro environment would likely involve sustained growth in these sectors, while an unfavorable scenario could arise if these areas experience a downturn or economic uncertainty increases.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-06-28 09:57:36.228586+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 72/100The thematic alignment between the ETF's name and its actual holdings is moderately strong, with a clear concentration in technology infrastructure and connectivity. The top ten positions are dominated by firms specializing in optical networking, satellite communications, and data center hardware, which suggests a genuine focus on digital backbone assets rather than broad market exposure. However, the presence of several mega-cap telecommunications giants like Cisco Systems and AT&T introduces some noise into the pure-play narrative; these large blue chips often serve as stabilizers that dilute the volatility typical of niche thematic funds. While companies such as ViaVIty Solutions and Iridium Communications fit a communications theme well, their inclusion alongside massive incumbents indicates an attempt to balance growth potential with established revenue streams, potentially at the expense of strict sector purity.
Sector coherence is evident within the Technology segment, which accounts for nearly forty percent of assets under management, reflecting a deliberate tilt toward hardware and software enablers of digital transformation. The Communication Services allocation further supports this narrative by including satellite operators and network service providers that complement the core technology holdings. Nevertheless, the fund exhibits significant concentration risk with its top ten positions representing over forty-four percent of total exposure, creating vulnerability to idiosyncratic events affecting specific large-cap names like Cisco or AT&T. This heavy weighting means the portfolio's performance will be disproportionately influenced by a small group of issuers rather than being driven purely by sector-wide trends, distinguishing it from diversified broad-market indices but also limiting its ability to capture smaller thematic opportunities across the entire universe.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-19 18:28:04.324723+00
🏢 Sector Analysis
AI GeneratedThe sector allocation of XTL reveals a distinct thematic focus on communications infrastructure and semiconductor equipment, with Technology holding the largest share at 38.5% followed by Communication Services at 14.2%. This distribution suggests an investment thesis centered on companies that provide essential hardware and software solutions for network expansion rather than broad-based consumer internet services or traditional media. The presence of specific holdings like CIEN within the technology slice, alongside top positions in IRDM, VSAT, VIAV, and EXTR across both sectors, indicates a strategy targeting firms involved in 5G deployment, fiber optics, and satellite connectivity. This heavy weighting implies that the fund's performance will be heavily correlated with capital expenditure cycles in telecommunications operators and global demand for network modernization.
The concentration risk profile is notable given that the top ten holdings account for 43.2% of assets under management, while a single position in IRDM exceeds five percent. Such granularity suggests limited diversification within its niche, meaning portfolio volatility may track closely with earnings reports or regulatory shifts affecting just a handful of specialized vendors rather than the broader market. The overlap between sector definitions and top holdings further highlights that the fund does not strictly adhere to standard GICS classifications but instead clusters companies by their specific role in network infrastructure regardless of primary industry labeling. This approach creates a factor tilt toward small-to-mid-cap growth stocks with high beta characteristics, as many names like VIAV and EXTR are often associated with cyclical industrial trends rather than defensive utility-like behavior.
Ultimately, the fund structure reflects a specialized play on the digital backbone of global connectivity, accepting higher idiosyncratic risk in exchange for exposure to niche industry tailwinds. The absence of significant allocations to consumer discretionary or financial services reinforces that this is not a general market proxy but a targeted vehicle for investors seeking specific infrastructure growth. As with any concentrated portfolio, returns will likely be amplified during periods of robust network spending while facing sharper drawdowns if regulatory headwinds or technological disruptions impact the core holdings disproportionately.
AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 17:40:46.263518+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share XTL's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of XTL's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPTMSPTM | $12B | — | 24 | 66.0% |
| VGTVGT | $122B | — | 19 | 52.7% |
| ONEOONEO | $25M | — | 17 | 48.4% |
| VOXVOX | $6B | — | 20 | 44.2% |
| VFMOVFMO | $1B | — | 11 | 34.0% |
66% of XTL's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM, which commands 28× more assets under management. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XTL's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXTL's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 69% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside XTL collectively pay out 34% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 28% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryXTL is up 82.9% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +25.2%. The remaining +57.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 87% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of XTL's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of XTL's analyzed weight, 36% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 64% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 72% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
MODERATEHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
XTL has a Passive Crowding Score of 28/100. On average, 8.3% of the market capitalization of XTL's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 13 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VSAT | VIASAT INC | 4.14% | — | 6/9 |
| 2 | IRDM | IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC | 3.75% | 44.0x | 7/9 |
| 3 | ATEX | ANTERIX INC Communication Services | 3.40% | 8.5x | 1/9 |
| 4 | EXTR | EXTREME NETWORKS INC | 3.37% | 264.5x | 6/9 |
| 5 | ANET | ARISTA NETWORKS INC Technology | 3.37% | 54.0x | 4/9 |
| 6 | FFIV | F5 INC Technology | 3.33% | 32.4x | 7/9 |
| 7 | CIEN | CIENA CORP Technology | 3.26% | 158.8x | 7/9 |
| 8 | VISN | VISTANCE NETWORKS INC | 3.14% | 18.5x | 7/9 |
| 9 | MSI | MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC Technology | 3.12% | 32.5x | 6/9 |
| 10 | GSAT | GLOBALSTAR INC | 3.09% | — | 4/9 |
| 11 | VIAV | VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC | 3.08% | — | 5/9 |
| 12 | CMCSA | COMCAST CORP CLASS A Communication Services | 3.04% | 4.5x | 8/9 |
| 13 | ASTS | AST SPACEMOBILE INC Technology | 3.03% | — | 4/9 |
| 14 | CSCO | CISCO SYSTEMS INC Technology | 3.02% | 37.9x | 8/9 |
| 15 | UNIT | UNITI GROUP INC | 2.95% | 2.5x | 5/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how XTL’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-07-03
15 holdings · 49.1% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VSAT | 4.14% | 336,048 | — |
| 2 | IRDM | 3.75% | 453,117 | — |
| 3 | ATEX | 3.40% | 211,826 | — |
| 4 | EXTR | 3.37% | 723,124 | — |
| 5 | ANET | 3.37% | 136,177 | — |
| 6 | FFIV | 3.33% | 52,888 | — |
| 7 | CIEN | 3.26% | 47,542 | — |
| 8 | VISN | 3.14% | 1,712,246 | — |
| 9 | MSI | 3.12% | 50,202 | — |
| 10 | GSAT | 3.09% | 257,338 | — |
| 11 | VIAV | 3.08% | 441,411 | — |
| 12 | CMCSA | 3.04% | 862,194 | — |
| 13 | ASTS | 3.03% | 236,676 | — |
| 14 | CSCO | 3.02% | 173,960 | — |
| 15 | UI | 2.95% | 37,069 | — |
2026-07-02
15 holdings · 48.0% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VSAT | 4.31% | 341,652 | — |
| 2 | IRDM | 3.55% | 460,675 | — |
| 3 | EXTR | 3.34% | 735,184 | — |
| 4 | CIEN | 3.33% | 48,336 | — |
| 5 | ANET | 3.30% | 138,449 | — |
| 6 | FFIV | 3.14% | 53,770 | — |
| 7 | VISN | 3.12% | 1,740,802 | — |
| 8 | ATEX | 3.11% | 215,358 | — |
| 9 | VIAV | 3.01% | 448,773 | — |
| 10 | ASTS | 3.00% | 240,624 | — |
| 11 | GSAT | 2.99% | 261,630 | — |
| 12 | CMCSA | 2.98% | 876,574 | — |
| 13 | MSI | 2.98% | 51,040 | — |
| 14 | LITE | 2.97% | 24,625 | — |
| 15 | CSCO | 2.92% | 176,862 | — |
2026-07-01
15 holdings · 48.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VSAT | 3.82% | 350,058 | — |
| 2 | IRDM | 3.66% | 472,012 | — |
| 3 | EXTR | 3.42% | 753,274 | — |
| 4 | CIEN | 3.37% | 49,527 | — |
| 5 | ANET | 3.31% | 141,857 | — |
| 6 | VISN | 3.27% | 1,783,639 | — |
| 7 | FFIV | 3.22% | 55,093 | — |
| 8 | VIAV | 3.10% | 459,816 | — |
| 9 | CMCSA | 3.09% | 898,144 | — |
| 10 | GSAT | 3.09% | 268,068 | — |
| 11 | ATEX | 3.08% | 220,656 | — |
| 12 | MSI | 3.07% | 52,297 | — |
| 13 | LITE | 3.05% | 25,231 | — |
| 14 | ASTS | 3.04% | 246,546 | — |
| 15 | CSCO | 3.03% | 181,215 | — |
2026-06-30
15 holdings · 48.6% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VSAT | 3.82% | 364,068 | — |
| 2 | IRDM | 3.66% | 490,907 | — |
| 3 | EXTR | 3.42% | 783,424 | — |
| 4 | CIEN | 3.37% | 51,512 | — |
| 5 | ANET | 3.31% | 147,537 | — |
| 6 | VISN | 3.27% | 1,855,034 | — |
| 7 | FFIV | 3.22% | 57,298 | — |
| 8 | VIAV | 3.10% | 478,221 | — |
| 9 | CMCSA | 3.09% | 934,094 | — |
| 10 | GSAT | 3.09% | 278,798 | — |
| 11 | ATEX | 3.08% | 229,491 | — |
| 12 | MSI | 3.07% | 54,392 | — |
| 13 | LITE | 3.05% | 26,241 | — |
| 14 | ASTS | 3.04% | 256,416 | — |
| 15 | CSCO | 3.03% | 188,470 | — |
2026-06-29
15 holdings · 48.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CIEN | 3.56% | 52,306 | — |
| 2 | ANET | 3.48% | 149,809 | — |
| 3 | EXTR | 3.46% | 795,486 | — |
| 4 | VIAV | 3.44% | 485,583 | — |
| 5 | VISN | 3.34% | 1,883,594 | — |
| 6 | LITE | 3.23% | 26,645 | — |
| 7 | LUMN | 3.22% | 2,752,419 | — |
| 8 | CSCO | 3.20% | 191,372 | — |
| 9 | GSAT | 3.18% | 283,090 | — |
| 10 | FFIV | 3.16% | 58,180 | — |
| 11 | UNIT | 3.15% | 1,958,224 | — |
| 12 | VZ | 3.14% | 484,238 | — |
| 13 | TMUS | 3.13% | 122,528 | — |
| 14 | VSAT | 3.12% | 369,674 | — |
| 15 | UI | 3.10% | 40,777 | — |
2026-06-28
15 holdings · 48.9% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CIEN | 3.56% | 52,306 | — |
| 2 | ANET | 3.48% | 149,809 | — |
| 3 | EXTR | 3.46% | 795,486 | — |
| 4 | VIAV | 3.44% | 485,583 | — |
| 5 | VISN | 3.34% | 1,883,594 | — |
| 6 | LITE | 3.23% | 26,645 | — |
| 7 | LUMN | 3.22% | 2,752,419 | — |
| 8 | CSCO | 3.20% | 191,372 | — |
| 9 | GSAT | 3.18% | 283,090 | — |
| 10 | FFIV | 3.16% | 58,180 | — |
| 11 | UNIT | 3.15% | 1,958,224 | — |
| 12 | VZ | 3.14% | 484,238 | — |
| 13 | TMUS | 3.13% | 122,528 | — |
| 14 | VSAT | 3.12% | 369,674 | — |
| 15 | UI | 3.10% | 40,777 | — |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove XTL Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How XTL’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
Positions Increased (1)
Positions Decreased (40)
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.