ETF · Broad Market

XTL(XTL)

$216.23
-3.73%
Expense Ratio
$418M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Truly Active
0%20%60%100%
97.6%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The portfolio's sector allocation is heavily skewed towards Technology, with nearly 38% of assets dedicated to this space. This is complemented by a notable presence in Other sectors, which comprise approximately 45% of the fund's holdings. Communication Services accounts for a smaller portion, around 18%. The market-cap profile is not explicitly stated, but given the sector breakdown and top holdings, it appears to be skewed towards mid-to-large cap names.

The concentration risk is elevated due to the presence of several large positions, with CIEN being the largest holding at 3.6% of assets. ANET, EXTR, VIAV, VISN, LITE, LUMN, CSCO, GSAT, and FFIV also comprise a significant portion of the portfolio, with each name accounting for around 3-4% of assets. The sector mix diverges from the broader market, which is likely to be influenced by these Technology and Other sector allocations. A favorable macro environment would likely involve sustained growth in these sectors, while an unfavorable scenario could arise if these areas experience a downturn or economic uncertainty increases.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-06-28 09:57:36.228586+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 72/100

The thematic alignment between the ETF's name and its actual holdings is moderately strong, with a clear concentration in technology infrastructure and connectivity. The top ten positions are dominated by firms specializing in optical networking, satellite communications, and data center hardware, which suggests a genuine focus on digital backbone assets rather than broad market exposure. However, the presence of several mega-cap telecommunications giants like Cisco Systems and AT&T introduces some noise into the pure-play narrative; these large blue chips often serve as stabilizers that dilute the volatility typical of niche thematic funds. While companies such as ViaVIty Solutions and Iridium Communications fit a communications theme well, their inclusion alongside massive incumbents indicates an attempt to balance growth potential with established revenue streams, potentially at the expense of strict sector purity.

Sector coherence is evident within the Technology segment, which accounts for nearly forty percent of assets under management, reflecting a deliberate tilt toward hardware and software enablers of digital transformation. The Communication Services allocation further supports this narrative by including satellite operators and network service providers that complement the core technology holdings. Nevertheless, the fund exhibits significant concentration risk with its top ten positions representing over forty-four percent of total exposure, creating vulnerability to idiosyncratic events affecting specific large-cap names like Cisco or AT&T. This heavy weighting means the portfolio's performance will be disproportionately influenced by a small group of issuers rather than being driven purely by sector-wide trends, distinguishing it from diversified broad-market indices but also limiting its ability to capture smaller thematic opportunities across the entire universe.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-19 18:28:04.324723+00

🏢 Sector Analysis

AI Generated

The sector allocation of XTL reveals a distinct thematic focus on communications infrastructure and semiconductor equipment, with Technology holding the largest share at 38.5% followed by Communication Services at 14.2%. This distribution suggests an investment thesis centered on companies that provide essential hardware and software solutions for network expansion rather than broad-based consumer internet services or traditional media. The presence of specific holdings like CIEN within the technology slice, alongside top positions in IRDM, VSAT, VIAV, and EXTR across both sectors, indicates a strategy targeting firms involved in 5G deployment, fiber optics, and satellite connectivity. This heavy weighting implies that the fund's performance will be heavily correlated with capital expenditure cycles in telecommunications operators and global demand for network modernization.

The concentration risk profile is notable given that the top ten holdings account for 43.2% of assets under management, while a single position in IRDM exceeds five percent. Such granularity suggests limited diversification within its niche, meaning portfolio volatility may track closely with earnings reports or regulatory shifts affecting just a handful of specialized vendors rather than the broader market. The overlap between sector definitions and top holdings further highlights that the fund does not strictly adhere to standard GICS classifications but instead clusters companies by their specific role in network infrastructure regardless of primary industry labeling. This approach creates a factor tilt toward small-to-mid-cap growth stocks with high beta characteristics, as many names like VIAV and EXTR are often associated with cyclical industrial trends rather than defensive utility-like behavior.

Ultimately, the fund structure reflects a specialized play on the digital backbone of global connectivity, accepting higher idiosyncratic risk in exchange for exposure to niche industry tailwinds. The absence of significant allocations to consumer discretionary or financial services reinforces that this is not a general market proxy but a targeted vehicle for investors seeking specific infrastructure growth. As with any concentrated portfolio, returns will likely be amplified during periods of robust network spending while facing sharper drawdowns if regulatory headwinds or technological disruptions impact the core holdings disproportionately.

AI-generated sector analysis from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 17:40:46.263518+00

Flow Driver Analysis

2-Step Circle

Which larger ETFs share XTL's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?

Approximately 100% of XTL's weight flows through these larger ETFs

Driver ETFAUMExpenseShared StocksWeight Overlap
SPTMSPTM$12B2466.0%
VGTVGT$122B1952.7%
ONEOONEO$25M1748.4%
VOXVOX$6B2044.2%
VFMOVFMO$1B1134.0%

66% of XTL's portfolio by weight is also held by SPTM, which commands 28× more assets under management. When SPTM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging XTL's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofXTL's weight.

Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

16.2x
Weighted P/E
9.06x
Weighted P/B
$49B
Wtd Avg Market Cap

Weighted metrics calculated based on 69% of fund assets with available data.

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

01000200030004000283
Well Diversified
Top 5: 18.0%Top 10: 34.0%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Mid Blend

Sector & Cap Explorer

Other45.0%Technology37.6%Communication Services17.4%
Visualization Mode

ETF Fundamental Radar

Total Analysis
100% Weight
Market Cap
Large
Risk Profile
High Distress

Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.

Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)

Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency

↑ Weight (%)100%80%60%40%20%
5%
0–3 Weak
67%
4–6 Average
27%
7–9 Strong

Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation.

Dividend Safety True-Up

Deterministic
34%
Wtd FCF Payout Ratio
0.00%
TTM Yield
Very Safe
Dividend Durability
34% of FCF
0% (retains all cash)50%100% (pays out everything)

The dividend-paying companies inside XTL collectively pay out 34% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. This leaves a substantial cash buffer, making dividend cuts unlikely even in a downturn. Based on 28% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.

FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.

Earnings vs. Price Decomposition

Proprietary
+82.9%
ETF 1Y Return
+25.2%
Wtd Earnings Growth
+57.7%
Multiple Expansion
Earnings
P/E Inflation

XTL is up 82.9% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +25.2%. The remaining +57.7% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.

Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 87% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.

Value Creation Map

ROIC vs WACC

What percentage of XTL's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?

36% Creators
64% Destroyers
Value Creators (ROIC > WACC)26.1%
Value Destroyers45.7%

Of XTL's analyzed weight, 36% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 64% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.

ROIC-WACC spread for 72% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.

Passive Crowding Score

MODERATE

How much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.

28/ 100
Wtd Avg Passive Ownership8.3%
Most Crowded HoldingAD (27.5%)
Least CrowdedUI (0.1%)
Coverage87% of fund weight
0 — Low255075100 — Extreme

XTL has a Passive Crowding Score of 28/100. On average, 8.3% of the market capitalization of XTL's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.

Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 13 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.

Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration34.0%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1VSAT
VIASAT INC
4.14%
6/9
2IRDM
IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC
3.75%
44.0x7/9
3ATEX
ANTERIX INC
Communication Services
3.40%
8.5x1/9
4EXTR
EXTREME NETWORKS INC
3.37%
264.5x6/9
5ANET
ARISTA NETWORKS INC
Technology
3.37%
54.0x4/9
6FFIV
F5 INC
Technology
3.33%
32.4x7/9
7CIEN
CIENA CORP
Technology
3.26%
158.8x7/9
8VISN
VISTANCE NETWORKS INC
3.14%
18.5x7/9
9MSI
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC
Technology
3.12%
32.5x6/9
10GSAT
GLOBALSTAR INC
3.09%
4/9
11VIAV
VIAVI SOLUTIONS INC
3.08%
5/9
12CMCSA
COMCAST CORP CLASS A
Communication Services
3.04%
4.5x8/9
13ASTS
AST SPACEMOBILE INC
Technology
3.03%
4/9
14CSCO
CISCO SYSTEMS INC
Technology
3.02%
37.9x8/9
15UNIT
UNITI GROUP INC
2.95%
2.5x5/9
The bottom 26 stocks in XTL account for only 50.9% of the total fund weight.

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how XTL’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-07-03

15 holdings · 49.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VSAT4.14%336,048
2IRDM3.75%453,117
3ATEX3.40%211,826
4EXTR3.37%723,124
5ANET3.37%136,177
6FFIV3.33%52,888
7CIEN3.26%47,542
8VISN3.14%1,712,246
9MSI3.12%50,202
10GSAT3.09%257,338
11VIAV3.08%441,411
12CMCSA3.04%862,194
13ASTS3.03%236,676
14CSCO3.02%173,960
15UI2.95%37,069

2026-07-02

15 holdings · 48.0% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VSAT4.31%341,652
2IRDM3.55%460,675
3EXTR3.34%735,184
4CIEN3.33%48,336
5ANET3.30%138,449
6FFIV3.14%53,770
7VISN3.12%1,740,802
8ATEX3.11%215,358
9VIAV3.01%448,773
10ASTS3.00%240,624
11GSAT2.99%261,630
12CMCSA2.98%876,574
13MSI2.98%51,040
14LITE2.97%24,625
15CSCO2.92%176,862

2026-07-01

15 holdings · 48.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VSAT3.82%350,058
2IRDM3.66%472,012
3EXTR3.42%753,274
4CIEN3.37%49,527
5ANET3.31%141,857
6VISN3.27%1,783,639
7FFIV3.22%55,093
8VIAV3.10%459,816
9CMCSA3.09%898,144
10GSAT3.09%268,068
11ATEX3.08%220,656
12MSI3.07%52,297
13LITE3.05%25,231
14ASTS3.04%246,546
15CSCO3.03%181,215

2026-06-30

15 holdings · 48.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1VSAT3.82%364,068
2IRDM3.66%490,907
3EXTR3.42%783,424
4CIEN3.37%51,512
5ANET3.31%147,537
6VISN3.27%1,855,034
7FFIV3.22%57,298
8VIAV3.10%478,221
9CMCSA3.09%934,094
10GSAT3.09%278,798
11ATEX3.08%229,491
12MSI3.07%54,392
13LITE3.05%26,241
14ASTS3.04%256,416
15CSCO3.03%188,470

2026-06-29

15 holdings · 48.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CIEN3.56%52,306
2ANET3.48%149,809
3EXTR3.46%795,486
4VIAV3.44%485,583
5VISN3.34%1,883,594
6LITE3.23%26,645
7LUMN3.22%2,752,419
8CSCO3.20%191,372
9GSAT3.18%283,090
10FFIV3.16%58,180
11UNIT3.15%1,958,224
12VZ3.14%484,238
13TMUS3.13%122,528
14VSAT3.12%369,674
15UI3.10%40,777

2026-06-28

15 holdings · 48.9% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1CIEN3.56%52,306
2ANET3.48%149,809
3EXTR3.46%795,486
4VIAV3.44%485,583
5VISN3.34%1,883,594
6LITE3.23%26,645
7LUMN3.22%2,752,419
8CSCO3.20%191,372
9GSAT3.18%283,090
10FFIV3.16%58,180
11UNIT3.15%1,958,224
12VZ3.14%484,238
13TMUS3.13%122,528
14VSAT3.12%369,674
15UI3.10%40,777

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

25.1%
Annual Volatility
2.03
Sharpe (1Y)
1.31
Sharpe (3Y)
-22.8%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-37.0%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

What Drove XTL Today?

Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.

Fund move:-3.73%(2026-07-02)

Top Contributors

+0.111%
+0.074%
+0.037%

Top Detractors

-0.282%
-0.316%
-0.355%

Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How XTL’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-07-0378 snapshots
Other45.0%
Technology37.6%
Communication Services17.4%
Change since 2026-03-30
Technology
+0.5%
Other
-0.4%
2026-03-302026-07-03

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

Comparing 2026-07-022026-07-031 buys, 40 sells

Positions Increased (1)

BUY-
823622K+621K (+75507.0%)
0.09%(+0.09)

Positions Decreased (40)

SELLLUMN
2.5M2.5M-42K (-1.6%)
2.66%(-0.09)
SELLONDS
2.3M2.2M-37K (-1.6%)
2.61%(-0.00)
SELLUNIT
1.8M1.8M-30K (-1.6%)
2.95%(+0.04)
SELLVISN
1.7M1.7M-29K (-1.6%)
3.14%(+0.02)
SELLGOGO
1.6M1.6M-26K (-1.6%)
0.81%(+0.11)
SELLLBTYK
1.3M1.3M-21K (-1.6%)
2.03%(+0.06)
SELLADTN
1.3M1.2M-21K (-1.6%)
2.50%(+0.05)
SELLT
905K890K-15K (-1.6%)
2.71%(+0.08)

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-07-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.