iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF(EMXC)
AI Look-Through Summary
AI GeneratedThe iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF maintains a substantial asset base of $17.5 billion, indicating significant liquidity and institutional interest in this specific subset of the emerging markets universe. By explicitly excluding Chinese equities from its benchmark, the fund structures itself to capture growth opportunities across other developing economies while avoiding direct exposure to regulatory or economic volatility within mainland China. This strategic omission fundamentally alters the risk profile compared to a broad emerging market index, shifting weight entirely toward alternative regional drivers such as industrialization in Asia-Pacific and infrastructure development elsewhere.
The portfolio exhibits a pronounced concentration among top holdings, with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company alone accounting for 17.2% of total assets under management. This single position represents nearly one-fifth of the fund's value, suggesting that performance will be heavily influenced by semiconductor sector dynamics and geopolitical tensions affecting this specific jurisdiction. South Korean equities follow as a secondary concentration point, collectively holding over 13% of the portfolio through three distinct top-tier positions including Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. Such high weighting in technology and electronics manufacturers implies that the fund's returns are intrinsically linked to global chip demand cycles rather than diversified consumption or financial services trends found in other emerging regions.
Geographically, the heavy reliance on Taiwanese and South Korean issuers creates a distinct tilt toward East Asian manufacturing hubs, diverging from traditional allocations often seen in broader emerging market baskets that might emphasize Latin America or India. The quantitative data reveals a lack of diversification beyond these two dominant economies, as the remaining top ten holdings collectively represent only about 32% of assets, with several other positions hovering near the 1% threshold. This structure means that while the fund avoids China, it effectively substitutes one concentrated regional exposure for another, leaving investors heavily exposed to semiconductor supply chain disruptions and currency fluctuations specific to these narrow geographic corridors rather than a truly broad-based emerging market play.
Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-23 17:59:39.088627+00
🔍 Theme Alignment Audit
AI GeneratedPurity: 95/100The investment theme implied by the name "MSCI Emerging Markets ex China" is strictly adherence to non-Chinese emerging economies, and the provided holdings align precisely with this objective. The top positions are exclusively domiciled in Taiwan, South Korea, India, Brazil, and other qualifying regions, with no exposure to Chinese issuers despite the potential for such a large market to dominate general emerging market indices. Notably absent from the list are any broad-market mega-cap names that might dilute thematic focus; instead, the portfolio relies on specific regional leaders like Samsung Electronics in South Korea or Tata Consultancy Services in India, which directly support the geographic exclusion strategy rather than undermining it with unrelated global giants.
Sector coherence appears robust given the inherent industrial diversification required across multiple distinct emerging markets. The top-10 concentration of 36.9% indicates a moderate level of risk where performance is heavily influenced by a small number of large regional players, yet this does not necessarily signal sector incoherence since these companies operate within their respective national economies' dominant industries such as technology and finance. This structure differentiates the fund from broad market indices that often include developed nation giants or specific sectors absent in developing markets; here, the weights reflect a genuine geographic mandate rather than an attempt to mimic global style factors. The absence of holdings unrelated to emerging market development suggests the portfolio maintains its intended scope without drifting into broader thematic areas like clean energy or artificial intelligence that might require different stock selection criteria outside these specific geographies.
AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-22 02:05:07.88279+00
Flow Driver Analysis
2-Step CircleWhich larger ETFs share EMXC's holdings — and mechanically drive its price through index rebalancing flows?
Approximately 100% of EMXC's weight flows through these larger ETFs
| Driver ETF | AUM | Expense | Shared Stocks | Weight Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | $25B | — | 647 | 100.0% |
| IXUSiShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | $52B | — | 642 | 100.0% |
| ACWIiShares MSCI ACWI ETF | $28B | — | 518 | 92.7% |
| SCHESCHE | $11B | — | 450 | 68.5% |
| SCHFSCHF | $57B | — | 75 | 23.0% |
100% of EMXC's portfolio by weight is also held by EEM. When EEM receives inflows, it mechanically buys these shared stocks — dragging EMXC's NAV along regardless of any thematic or sector catalyst. Combined, the top 5 overlapping ETFs control exposure to 100% ofEMXC's weight.
Overlap computed from constituent-level holdings data across 5 ETFs. Price co-movement with driver ETFs is structural, not coincidental. Not investment advice.
ETF Look-Through Dashboard
Replaces $249/yr MorningstarPeer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.
Weighted metrics calculated based on 37% of fund assets with available data.
Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index
Morningstar-Style Box
Sector & Cap Explorer
ETF Fundamental Radar
Operational health is mixed, with the bulk of weight in the mid-range (4–6) Piotroski scores.
Piotroski F-Score (Operational Health)
Score 0-9: Measures Profitability, Leverage, and Efficiency
Based on 73% of fund weight with Piotroski data.
Computed by rolling up individual stock Piotroski F-Scores, Altman Z-Scores, and Beneish M-Scores weighted by each constituent's allocation. Data that Vanguard and BlackRock don't surface.
Dividend Safety True-Up
DeterministicThe dividend-paying companies inside EMXC collectively pay out 553% of their Free Cash Flow to maintain the current yield. Warning: constituent companies are paying out nearly all cash flow. A wave of dividend cuts may be imminent if earnings decline. Based on 46% of fund weight in dividend-paying stocks.
FCF Payout Ratio = Dividends Paid / Free Cash Flow, weighted by constituent allocation. Not investment advice.
Earnings vs. Price Decomposition
ProprietaryEMXC is up 79.7% over the last 12 months. The underlying weighted earnings growth of its constituents is +43.6%. The remaining +36.1% of performance is driven by multiple expansion (P/E inflation) — prices rose faster than earnings grew.
Earnings growth = weighted average YoY EPS growth of all constituents (capped at ±500% to limit outlier distortion). Based on 72% of fund weight with earnings data. Not investment advice.
Value Creation Map
ROIC vs WACCWhat percentage of EMXC's weight is allocated to companies that create economic value (ROIC > WACC) vs. destroy it?
Of EMXC's analyzed weight, 75% is invested in companies earning more than their cost of capital — genuine value creators. The remaining 25% consists of companies whose ROIC falls below their WACC, effectively destroying shareholder value with every dollar invested.
ROIC-WACC spread for 41% of fund weight with available data. Not investment advice.
Concentration Risk Monitor
HIGHTW0002330008 at 17.2% contributes an estimated 74% of portfolio variance.EMXC holds 50 stocks but behaves like an 25-stock portfolio due to weight concentration in the top holdings.
Effective # of Stocks = 1 / HHI (Herfindahl-Hirschman Index). Variance share approximated as w² / Σw². Not investment advice.
Passive Crowding Score
LOWHow much of each constituent's market cap is structurally locked in passive ETFs — a proxy for liquidity fragility during sell-offs.
EMXC has a low Passive Crowding Score of 0/100. On average, 0.1% of the market capitalization of EMXC's underlying holdings is structurally locked in passive ETF vehicles. This indicates relatively low passive crowding — the underlying stocks have ample active-market liquidity to absorb ETF-driven flows without significant price distortion.
Passive $ = Σ(ETF AUM × holding weight) across all 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds). Not investment advice.
Under the Hood — Top 15 Constituents
| # | Ticker | Company | Weight | P/E | F-Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TW0002330008 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | 17.23% | 31.9x | 9/9 |
| 2 | KR7005930003 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 7.96% | — | 6/9 |
| 3 | KR7000660001 | SK hynix Inc. | 4.54% | — | 8/9 |
| 4 | INE040A01034 | HDFC BANK LIMITED | 1.25% | 16.6x | 5/9 |
| 5 | TW0002317005 | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. | 1.08% | 15.0x | 6/9 |
| 6 | TW0002454006 | MediaTek Inc. | 1.05% | 24.1x | 4/9 |
| 7 | INE002A01018 | RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED | 1.05% | 22.1x | 4/9 |
| 8 | TW0002308004 | DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. | 0.98% | 65.6x | 8/9 |
| 9 | KR7005931001 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | 0.92% | — | — |
| 10 | INE090A01021 | ICICI BANK LIMITED | 0.85% | 17.2x | 6/9 |
| 11 | GB00BRXH2664 | ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC | 0.72% | 14.2x | 8/9 |
| 12 | BRVALEACNOR0 | VALE S.A. | 0.70% | 27.4x | 5/9 |
| 13 | KR7005380001 | HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY | 0.70% | — | — |
| 14 | 066922519 | BlackRock Funds III: BlackRock Cash Funds: Institutional; SL Agency Shares | 0.70% | — | — |
| 15 | INE397D01024 | BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED | 0.60% | 36.2x | 6/9 |
Historical Holdings Snapshots
Browse how EMXC’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.
2026-05-24
15 holdings · 40.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TW0002330008 | 17.23% | 49,811,000 | $3.1B |
| 2 | KR7005930003 | 7.96% | 9,596,824 | $1.4B |
| 3 | KR7000660001 | 4.54% | 1,106,509 | $818.1M |
| 4 | INE040A01034 | 1.25% | 22,996,889 | $224.8M |
| 5 | TW0002317005 | 1.08% | 25,416,200 | $194.4M |
| 6 | TW0002454006 | 1.05% | 3,083,000 | $189.9M |
| 7 | INE002A01018 | 1.05% | 12,340,458 | $189.4M |
| 8 | TW0002308004 | 0.98% | 3,934,000 | $177.4M |
| 9 | KR7005931001 | 0.92% | 1,653,089 | $166.0M |
| 10 | INE090A01021 | 0.85% | 10,098,362 | $153.6M |
| 11 | GB00BRXH2664 | 0.72% | 1,019,836 | $130.5M |
| 12 | BRVALEACNOR0 | 0.70% | 7,340,754 | $126.7M |
| 13 | KR7005380001 | 0.70% | 269,473 | $126.3M |
| 14 | 066922519 | 0.70% | 125,637,078 | $125.7M |
| 15 | INE397D01024 | 0.60% | 5,203,107 | $107.7M |
2026-05-23
15 holdings · 40.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TW0002330008 | 17.23% | 49,811,000 | $3.1B |
| 2 | KR7005930003 | 7.96% | 9,596,824 | $1.4B |
| 3 | KR7000660001 | 4.54% | 1,106,509 | $818.1M |
| 4 | INE040A01034 | 1.25% | 22,996,889 | $224.8M |
| 5 | TW0002317005 | 1.08% | 25,416,200 | $194.4M |
| 6 | TW0002454006 | 1.05% | 3,083,000 | $189.9M |
| 7 | INE002A01018 | 1.05% | 12,340,458 | $189.4M |
| 8 | TW0002308004 | 0.98% | 3,934,000 | $177.4M |
| 9 | KR7005931001 | 0.92% | 1,653,089 | $166.0M |
| 10 | INE090A01021 | 0.85% | 10,098,362 | $153.6M |
| 11 | GB00BRXH2664 | 0.72% | 1,019,836 | $130.5M |
| 12 | BRVALEACNOR0 | 0.70% | 7,340,754 | $126.7M |
| 13 | KR7005380001 | 0.70% | 269,473 | $126.3M |
| 14 | 066922519 | 0.70% | 125,637,078 | $125.7M |
| 15 | INE397D01024 | 0.60% | 5,203,107 | $107.7M |
2026-05-22
15 holdings · 40.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TW0002330008 | 17.23% | 49,811,000 | $3.1B |
| 2 | KR7005930003 | 7.96% | 9,596,824 | $1.4B |
| 3 | KR7000660001 | 4.54% | 1,106,509 | $818.1M |
| 4 | INE040A01034 | 1.25% | 22,996,889 | $224.8M |
| 5 | TW0002317005 | 1.08% | 25,416,200 | $194.4M |
| 6 | TW0002454006 | 1.05% | 3,083,000 | $189.9M |
| 7 | INE002A01018 | 1.05% | 12,340,458 | $189.4M |
| 8 | TW0002308004 | 0.98% | 3,934,000 | $177.4M |
| 9 | KR7005931001 | 0.92% | 1,653,089 | $166.0M |
| 10 | INE090A01021 | 0.85% | 10,098,362 | $153.6M |
| 11 | GB00BRXH2664 | 0.72% | 1,019,836 | $130.5M |
| 12 | BRVALEACNOR0 | 0.70% | 7,340,754 | $126.7M |
| 13 | KR7005380001 | 0.70% | 269,473 | $126.3M |
| 14 | 066922519 | 0.70% | 125,637,078 | $125.7M |
| 15 | INE397D01024 | 0.60% | 5,203,107 | $107.7M |
2026-05-21
15 holdings · 40.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TW0002330008 | 17.23% | 49,811,000 | $3.1B |
| 2 | KR7005930003 | 7.96% | 9,596,824 | $1.4B |
| 3 | KR7000660001 | 4.54% | 1,106,509 | $818.1M |
| 4 | INE040A01034 | 1.25% | 22,996,889 | $224.8M |
| 5 | TW0002317005 | 1.08% | 25,416,200 | $194.4M |
| 6 | TW0002454006 | 1.05% | 3,083,000 | $189.9M |
| 7 | INE002A01018 | 1.05% | 12,340,458 | $189.4M |
| 8 | TW0002308004 | 0.98% | 3,934,000 | $177.4M |
| 9 | KR7005931001 | 0.92% | 1,653,089 | $166.0M |
| 10 | INE090A01021 | 0.85% | 10,098,362 | $153.6M |
| 11 | GB00BRXH2664 | 0.72% | 1,019,836 | $130.5M |
| 12 | BRVALEACNOR0 | 0.70% | 7,340,754 | $126.7M |
| 13 | KR7005380001 | 0.70% | 269,473 | $126.3M |
| 14 | 066922519 | 0.70% | 125,637,078 | $125.7M |
| 15 | INE397D01024 | 0.60% | 5,203,107 | $107.7M |
2026-05-20
15 holdings · 40.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TW0002330008 | 17.23% | 49,811,000 | $3.1B |
| 2 | KR7005930003 | 7.96% | 9,596,824 | $1.4B |
| 3 | KR7000660001 | 4.54% | 1,106,509 | $818.1M |
| 4 | INE040A01034 | 1.25% | 22,996,889 | $224.8M |
| 5 | TW0002317005 | 1.08% | 25,416,200 | $194.4M |
| 6 | TW0002454006 | 1.05% | 3,083,000 | $189.9M |
| 7 | INE002A01018 | 1.05% | 12,340,458 | $189.4M |
| 8 | TW0002308004 | 0.98% | 3,934,000 | $177.4M |
| 9 | KR7005931001 | 0.92% | 1,653,089 | $166.0M |
| 10 | INE090A01021 | 0.85% | 10,098,362 | $153.6M |
| 11 | GB00BRXH2664 | 0.72% | 1,019,836 | $130.5M |
| 12 | BRVALEACNOR0 | 0.70% | 7,340,754 | $126.7M |
| 13 | KR7005380001 | 0.70% | 269,473 | $126.3M |
| 14 | 066922519 | 0.70% | 125,637,078 | $125.7M |
| 15 | INE397D01024 | 0.60% | 5,203,107 | $107.7M |
2026-05-19
15 holdings · 40.3% tracked weight| # | Ticker | Weight | Shares | Market Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TW0002330008 | 17.23% | 49,811,000 | $3.1B |
| 2 | KR7005930003 | 7.96% | 9,596,824 | $1.4B |
| 3 | KR7000660001 | 4.54% | 1,106,509 | $818.1M |
| 4 | INE040A01034 | 1.25% | 22,996,889 | $224.8M |
| 5 | TW0002317005 | 1.08% | 25,416,200 | $194.4M |
| 6 | TW0002454006 | 1.05% | 3,083,000 | $189.9M |
| 7 | INE002A01018 | 1.05% | 12,340,458 | $189.4M |
| 8 | TW0002308004 | 0.98% | 3,934,000 | $177.4M |
| 9 | KR7005931001 | 0.92% | 1,653,089 | $166.0M |
| 10 | INE090A01021 | 0.85% | 10,098,362 | $153.6M |
| 11 | GB00BRXH2664 | 0.72% | 1,019,836 | $130.5M |
| 12 | BRVALEACNOR0 | 0.70% | 7,340,754 | $126.7M |
| 13 | KR7005380001 | 0.70% | 269,473 | $126.3M |
| 14 | 066922519 | 0.70% | 125,637,078 | $125.7M |
| 15 | INE397D01024 | 0.60% | 5,203,107 | $107.7M |
Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.
Risk Profile
Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.
Fama-French 5-Factor Exposure
Academic factor model decomposition — what's really driving this ETF's returns.
Fama-French 5-Factor Model. Data: Kenneth French Data Library. Regression over 3 years of daily returns.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
What Drove EMXC Today?
Daily return attribution — which holdings contributed most (and least) to the fund's move.
Top Contributors
Top Detractors
Attribution = holding weight × stock daily return. Only the top contributors and detractors are shown.
Technical Setup
AI GeneratedThe iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF is currently trading at $92.08, presenting a specific point of reference for assessing its position relative to long-term moving averages. Without access to the precise values of the surrounding Simple Moving Average envelope, it remains impossible to definitively characterize whether this price level represents an overbought extension or an oversold contraction within that statistical band. The current valuation sits as a static data point against which mean-reversion theories would be tested; if historical patterns suggest prices frequently oscillate around these averages, the distance between $92.08 and the central trend line becomes the critical variable for determining potential reversal strength. In diversified emerging markets sectors, deviations from moving average envelopes often signal periods where statistical probability favors a return toward equilibrium rather than continued directional momentum. At this specific price of $92.08, the asset's behavior relative to its recent history will dictate whether it is exhibiting characteristics typical of a trend continuation or a correction phase. Observers must analyze how far this figure lies from the upper and lower bounds of the envelope to gauge the severity of any potential mean-reversion opportunity, as extreme distances historically correlate with higher probabilities of price adjustment back toward the average. The technical narrative here relies entirely on the spatial relationship between $92.08 and the implied moving averages that are not explicitly defined in the current dataset. If this price is significantly detached from the trend center, it suggests a heightened likelihood of volatility as market
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Yield & Income
Sector Drift Over Time
How EMXC’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.
Active Conviction Tracker
Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.
AUM & Capital Flow Tracker
Estimated assets under management derived from SEC filings and daily price movements — tracks how the fund's value evolves over time.
Estimated AUM derived from the latest SEC N-PORT filing TNA ($18.36B) scaled by daily price changes. Filing snapshots update when new regulatory filings are published (quarterly for most funds, daily for ARK).
Explore More
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.
SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.