ETF · Broad Market

STOT(STOT)

$46.94
+0.01%
Expense Ratio
$399M
Total AUM
Holdings
Inception
Active Share vs VOO
Moderate
0%20%60%100%
52.7%

AI Look-Through Summary

AI Generated

The ETF STOT currently presents a unique data profile with an Assets Under Management of $400 million, yet the provided disclosure reveals no specific sector exposure or identifiable top holdings. The absence of listed equity positions and the notation of "N/A" for holding percentages suggests that either the fund has not yet established a defined portfolio strategy or the underlying assets are structured in a manner where traditional ownership data is unavailable to standard reporting mechanisms. Without visible constituents, it is impossible to determine if the vehicle targets specific industries, themes, or market capitalizations, leaving its primary investment objective opaque based on current filings.

Geographic tilt and quantitative metrics such as turnover rates, expense ratios relative to peers, or tracking error cannot be synthesized from the available information due to a complete lack of portfolio detail. While the $400 million AUM indicates a measurable level of investor participation, the structural ambiguity regarding what assets actually comprise this fund prevents any assessment of concentration risk or diversification benefits typically associated with equity ETFs. The singular data point showing 5.1% for an unidentified position further complicates analysis, as it fails to provide context on whether this represents a single dominant holding across a broad basket or if the entire allocation remains unreported.

In its current state of disclosure, STOT functions more as a placeholder instrument than a fully transparent investment vehicle with discernible characteristics. The inability to map holdings to sectors, regions, or specific companies means that standard analytical frameworks regarding risk exposure and asset correlation cannot be applied effectively. Stakeholders relying on this data would face significant challenges in evaluating the fund's alignment with broader market trends or its suitability for specific portfolio roles without additional transparency from the issuer regarding its actual underlying composition and investment mandate.

Generated by Qwen-32B from constituent-level data. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-18 13:01:56.308877+00

🔍 Theme Alignment Audit

AI GeneratedPurity: 10/100

The provided data presents a fundamental inability to assess thematic alignment because the top holdings are listed as "N/A" with no specific securities identified. Without knowledge of which companies constitute the portfolio, it is impossible to determine if any assets relate to an implied investment theme or if the fund relies on broad-market names for stability. The complete absence of identifiable equity positions suggests that either the data feed failed to populate the necessary information or the fund structure does not currently hold investable securities in a manner visible through this report. Consequently, no observation regarding thematic coherence can be made based solely on these missing identifiers.

Regarding concentration risk and sector breakdown, the metrics indicate an extremely low top-ten concentration of 5.6%, yet this figure appears disconnected from standard equity fund structures where such a low percentage would imply thousands of holdings or significant cash drag rather than a diversified portfolio of actual stocks. The lack of sector weights in the provided data prevents any evaluation of whether the asset allocation is consistent with a specific theme or differentiated from a broad market index. Since no sectors are listed and no individual companies can be named, there is insufficient evidence to conclude if the fund maintains thematic focus or simply utilizes a passive strategy that lacks transparency in its current reporting format. The audit must remain inconclusive on all fronts due to these critical data gaps.

AI analysis of holdings alignment vs fund theme. Not investment advice. Updated: 2026-05-24 05:03:44.353958+00

ETF Look-Through Dashboard

Replaces $249/yr Morningstar

Peer through the ETF wrapper to see exactly what you own. Every metric is computed from constituent-level data.

4.46%
Dividend Yield

Herfindahl-Hirschman Concentration Index

0100020003000400029
Well Diversified
Top 5: 5.4%Top 10: 5.4%

Morningstar-Style Box

Value
Blend
Growth
Large
Mid
Small
Small Value

Under the Hood — Top 1 Constituents

Top 10 Concentration5.6%
#TickerCompanyWeightP/EF-Score
1-
Prestige Brands 5.6285 06/12/2033
5.63%

Historical Holdings Snapshots

Browse how STOT’s holdings have changed across SEC filing dates. Showing top holdings per snapshot.

2026-05-24

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.63%45,281

2026-05-23

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.63%45,281

2026-05-22

1 holdings · 5.6% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.63%44,887

2026-05-21

1 holdings · 5.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.13%60,062

2026-05-20

1 holdings · 5.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.13%60,093

2026-05-19

1 holdings · 5.1% tracked weight
#TickerWeightSharesMarket Value
1-5.13%60,000

Source: SEC filings and fund provider disclosures. Shows last 6 snapshot dates, top 15 holdings per date by weight.

Risk Profile

1.7%
Annual Volatility
-0.21
Sharpe (1Y)
0.15
Sharpe (3Y)
-0.9%
Max Drawdown (3Y)
-6.1%
Max Drawdown (5Y)

Sharpe = risk-adjusted return (higher is better). Computed from 1,200+ trading days with 5% risk-free rate.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the ETF's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Yield & Income

0.00%
TTM Yield
30-Day SEC Yield
5Y Div CAGR

Sector Drift Over Time

How STOT’s sector allocation has shifted across snapshots. Use the slider to travel through time.

2026-05-2452 snapshots
Other100.0%
2026-03-302026-05-24

Active Conviction Tracker

Shares bought and sold between the latest two data snapshots — reveals what the fund manager is actually doing.

No position changes detected between snapshots.

Explore More

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: 2026-06-02.

SecuritiesDB is for informational purposes only. Not investment advice.