1113.HK (1113.HK)

$153.2B
Market Cap
14.1
P/E Ratio
0.51
Beta
4.05%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 4/9Altman Z 1.4 DistressROIC−WACC -4.3%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 1.4.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation profile reveals a significant disconnect between operational profitability and cost of capital, as the return on invested capital stands at 2.9%, trailing the weighted average cost of capital by 4.3%. This negative spread indicates that current investments are eroding shareholder value rather than creating it, a conclusion reinforced by an Altman Z-Score of 1.4 which signals proximity to financial distress territory. Despite these efficiency concerns, earnings power remains robust with net margins expanding to 30.6% and gross margins holding at 52.5%, suggesting strong pricing discipline or cost advantages that have decoupled from revenue performance. However, the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 highlights a lack of fundamental improvement across multiple dimensions, particularly evidenced by year-over-year revenue contraction of 3.6%. The DuPont components are not fully detailed here, but the divergence between high margins and negative ROIC implies that leverage or asset turnover issues may be suppressing overall returns despite top-line profitability on sales.

Valuation metrics present a mixed picture where the current price-to-earnings multiple of 14.1x appears compressed relative to typical growth expectations given the margin profile, yet it does not explicitly reflect the deteriorating revenue trajectory when compared against historical or sector averages without those specific benchmarks provided. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests an intrinsic fair value of $45; however, this valuation anchor assumes a recovery in cash flows that contradicts the current negative ROIC-WACC spread and declining top-line growth. The market pricing likely reflects uncertainty regarding whether the company can reverse its revenue decline or if the high margins are sustainable without corresponding capital efficiency gains to justify the cost of equity at 7.2%.

Risk factors further complicate the investment thesis, as the combination of a low Altman score and negative economic value added creates substantial downside volatility potential absent any provided Fama-French alpha data to suggest stock-specific outperformance against market risk premiums. Insider activity levels are not specified in the available dataset, leaving the directionality of management sentiment ambiguous amidst these fundamental headwinds. The convergence of shrinking revenues, capital destruction, and a fragile solvency profile suggests that any current valuation support relies heavily on an anticipated turnaround rather than existing operational fundamentals.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.2%9.2%
2%$49$38$27
3%$63$45$30
4%$91$57$35

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $45 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

4/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
1.4
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

52.5%
Gross Margin
30.6%
Net Margin
2.9%
ROIC
7.2%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -4.3%— Negative spread.
-3.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-20.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
9.6B
Free Cash Flow
74%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.25x
Debt / Equity
4.26x
Current Ratio
8.3x
Interest Coverage
0.3x
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.04%
FCF Yield
18.8B
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

11.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
0.39
Price/Book
5M
Avg Volume
$49.94
52W High
$28.10
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in 1113.HK to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

1113.HK Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
1113.HKEpicenterEWHETF1299.HKMed Risk0388.HKHigh Risk0001.HKUnknown2388.HKHigh Risk0016.HKUnknown
1113.HK Price Drop (%)0

If 1113.HK (1113.HK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies AIA Group Ltd (1299.HK) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with 1113.HK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

1113.HK Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
1113.HK

ETFs with Highest 1113.HK Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

1113.HK Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does 1113.HK convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$9.6B
EBITDA
$18.8B
FCF Conversion
51%
Reinvestment Rate
49%
51% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
2.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-4.3%

1113.HK converts 51% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare 1113.HK to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.