6758.T (6758.T)

$18.94T
Market Cap
15.5
P/E Ratio
0.70
Beta
0.78%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 1.1 DistressBeneish M -2.79 CleanROIC−WACC -3.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 1.1.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economic profile presents a stark dichotomy between operational efficiency and capital allocation efficacy. While the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicates robust financial strength with strong balance sheet characteristics, the Altman Z-Score of 1.1 signals elevated distress risk that contradicts this otherwise healthy scorecard. This tension is most evident in the negative ROIC-WACC spread of -3.8%, suggesting the company is currently destroying value as it reinvests capital at returns below its cost of equity. Despite generating an 8.8% net margin on a revenue base showing negligible contraction, the DuPont components reveal that profitability alone cannot offset the inefficient deployment of capital relative to market expectations for risk-adjusted returns.

Valuation metrics further complicate the investment thesis by highlighting significant divergence between current pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at 15.5x earnings, the stock appears compressed compared to typical sector multiples if growth were absent, yet this discount fails to align with a DCF-derived fair value of $3,582 per share. This substantial gap implies that market participants are heavily penalizing the firm for its negative capital efficiency and distress indicators rather than focusing on its margin resilience or low revenue volatility. The pricing action suggests the market is primarily valuing the downside risk associated with the Altman score while largely ignoring the potential recovery of ROIC in future periods.

The Beneish M-Score of -2.79 provides a counterweight to the distress signals, offering strong evidence against earnings manipulation and supporting the integrity of the reported net margins. However, the combination of a low Z-score and negative capital spread creates a risk profile where downside protection is weak despite high-quality accounting metrics. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation adequately compensates for the probability of financial deterioration indicated by the Altman metric or if the market has overreacted to short-term inefficiencies given the company's otherwise solid F-Score fundamentals.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6.7%8.7%10.7%
2%$4428$3187$2515
3%$5363$3582$2724
4%$6990$4146$2996

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $3582 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.1
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.79
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

28.3%
Gross Margin
8.8%
Net Margin
4.9%
ROIC
8.7%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -3.8%— Negative spread.
-0.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+17.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
1.7T
Free Cash Flow
7%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

3.15x
Debt / Equity
0.70x
Current Ratio
37.1x
Interest Coverage
-0.3x
Net Debt / EBITDA
9.29%
FCF Yield
2.7T
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $24.95
Act: $32.88
+31.8%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $35.87
Act: $39.40
+9.8%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $51.51
Act: $60.43
+17.3%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $59.92
Act: $62.82
+4.8%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

17.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.33
Price/Book
22M
Avg Volume
$4776.00
52W High
$2980.50
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in 6758.T to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

6758.T Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
6758.TEpicenterEWJETF8306.THigh Risk7203.TMed Risk6501.TLow Risk6857.TLow Risk8316.THigh Risk
6758.T Price Drop (%)0

If 6758.T (6758.T) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc (8306.T) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with 6758.T. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

6758.T Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
6758.T

ETFs with Highest 6758.T Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

6758.T Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does 6758.T convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$1674.1B
EBITDA
$2667.6B
FCF Conversion
63%
Reinvestment Rate
37%
63% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
4.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-3.8%

6758.T converts 63% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare 6758.T to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.