6758.T (6758.T)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 1.1.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economic profile presents a stark dichotomy between operational efficiency and capital allocation efficacy. While the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicates robust financial strength with strong balance sheet characteristics, the Altman Z-Score of 1.1 signals elevated distress risk that contradicts this otherwise healthy scorecard. This tension is most evident in the negative ROIC-WACC spread of -3.8%, suggesting the company is currently destroying value as it reinvests capital at returns below its cost of equity. Despite generating an 8.8% net margin on a revenue base showing negligible contraction, the DuPont components reveal that profitability alone cannot offset the inefficient deployment of capital relative to market expectations for risk-adjusted returns.
Valuation metrics further complicate the investment thesis by highlighting significant divergence between current pricing and intrinsic value models. Trading at 15.5x earnings, the stock appears compressed compared to typical sector multiples if growth were absent, yet this discount fails to align with a DCF-derived fair value of $3,582 per share. This substantial gap implies that market participants are heavily penalizing the firm for its negative capital efficiency and distress indicators rather than focusing on its margin resilience or low revenue volatility. The pricing action suggests the market is primarily valuing the downside risk associated with the Altman score while largely ignoring the potential recovery of ROIC in future periods.
The Beneish M-Score of -2.79 provides a counterweight to the distress signals, offering strong evidence against earnings manipulation and supporting the integrity of the reported net margins. However, the combination of a low Z-score and negative capital spread creates a risk profile where downside protection is weak despite high-quality accounting metrics. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation adequately compensates for the probability of financial deterioration indicated by the Altman metric or if the market has overreacted to short-term inefficiencies given the company's otherwise solid F-Score fundamentals.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6.7% | 8.7% | 10.7% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $4428 | $3187 | $2515 |
| 3% | $5363 | $3582 | $2724 |
| 4% | $6990 | $4146 | $2996 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=8.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $3582 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in 6758.T to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If 6758.T (6758.T) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc (8306.T) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with 6758.T. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
6758.T Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest 6758.T Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
6758.T Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does 6758.T convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
6758.T converts 63% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-3.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare 6758.T to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.