8035.T (8035.T)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 17.1 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of this entity demonstrate a robust quality profile characterized by an ROIC exceeding 28%, indicating highly efficient capital deployment relative to the cost of equity. This superior return is primarily driven by exceptional profitability metrics rather than operational leverage or asset intensity, as evidenced by a net margin of 22.4% and a gross margin of 47.1%. The DuPont decomposition suggests that high margins are the dominant engine for returns, supported by strong revenue growth of 32.8% YoY which fuels top-line expansion without diluting profit quality. Creditworthiness is further affirmed by an Altman Z-Score of 17.1 and a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, signaling low bankruptcy risk and sustained financial strength compared to historical norms.
Valuation multiples currently sit at 33.0x P/E, which requires contextualization against sector averages and the company's own historical range to determine if the premium is justified by its growth trajectory or speculative sentiment. A DCF analysis implies a fair value of $31,914; comparing this intrinsic estimate directly against current market pricing reveals whether the stock trades at a discount or premium relative to calculated cash flow potential. The market appears to be pricing in significant future earnings expansion given the wide gap between typical valuation multiples and the 32.8% revenue growth rate, though investors must assess if these high-growth expectations are fully embedded in current share prices before concluding on margin of safety.
Risk assessment relies heavily on monitoring whether such aggressive growth rates can sustain over time without compressing margins or eroding the high ROIC foundation currently observed. While the Piotroski score indicates stable fundamentals, any deviation from the 32.8% revenue expansion could rapidly alter valuation dynamics and pressure the multiple toward historical means. The combination of a low bankruptcy risk profile and strong profitability creates a compelling case for capital appreciation if growth persists, yet the elevated P/E leaves little room for error should execution falter or macroeconomic conditions tighten credit spreads affecting high-growth sectors.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $38840 | $28646 | $22569 |
| 3% | $45406 | $31914 | $24462 |
| 4% | $55254 | $36272 | $26827 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $31914 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in 8035.T to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If 8035.T (8035.T) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc (8306.T) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with 8035.T. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
8035.T Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest 8035.T Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
8035.T Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does 8035.T convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
8035.T converts 55% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare 8035.T to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.