8058.T (8058.T)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 2.8.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency presents a neutral profile, as the return on invested capital of 7.9% exactly matches the weighted average cost of capital, resulting in zero value creation from core operations. Despite this flat spread, earnings quality appears robust given a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and an Altman Z-Score of 2.8, suggesting strong balance sheet stability relative to industry distress thresholds. However, profitability drivers are under pressure; the DuPont decomposition reveals that while margins remain positive at 5.1% net and 9.9% gross, revenue contraction of -4.9% YoY indicates a deterioration in top-line momentum rather than an expansion via leverage or turnover efficiency.
Valuation metrics reflect significant divergence between historical norms and current pricing, with the stock trading at 32.4x earnings despite negative growth trajectories. This premium multiple implies the market is pricing in substantial future recovery or operational turnaround that contradicts recent performance data. A discounted cash flow analysis suggests a fair value of $15,866; without specific share count context to convert this absolute figure into a per-share target price relative to current trading levels, the gap between implied intrinsic value and observed market multiple remains ambiguous regarding overvaluation or undervaluation status.
The risk-reward profile is complicated by conflicting signals: strong fundamental scores contrast sharply with declining revenue and zero economic spread. While the high Piotroski score mitigates immediate solvency concerns typical of distressed firms, the inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital limits long-term compounding potential absent a reversal in sales trends. Investors must weigh whether current pricing adequately compensates for the lack of organic growth and neutral capital efficiency against the underlying financial stability indicated by the Z-Score.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.9% | 9.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $20654 | $13430 | $9677 |
| 3% | $27035 | $15866 | $10881 |
| 4% | $39795 | $19540 | $12491 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $15866 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in 8058.T to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If 8058.T (8058.T) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc (8306.T) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with 8058.T. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
8058.T Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest 8058.T Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
8058.T Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does 8058.T convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
8058.T converts 63% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-0.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare 8058.T to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.