9988.HK (9988.HK)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.5 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). Beneish M-Score of -2.05 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates a robust fundamental profile characterized by strong profitability drivers and solid financial health. The ROIC-WACC spread of +2.2% indicates value creation, though the margin for error is moderate compared to high-growth peers. DuPont decomposition reveals that an 11.9% return on equity is primarily fueled by exceptional net margins at 13.1%, supported by a healthy gross margin of 40.0%, rather than aggressive leverage or asset turnover which sits at 0.55x. This operational stability is corroborated by high-quality integrity metrics: a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals strong financial position and profitability trends, while an Altman Z-Score of 3.5 places the firm in the "Safe Zone" regarding bankruptcy risk. Additionally, a Beneish M-Score of -2.05 suggests earnings are unlikely to be manipulated, reinforcing confidence in the reported net margins.
Valuation currently sits at a premium relative to historical norms and sector averages, trading at 22.3x forward earnings. While the DCF model implies a fair value of $124 based on current inputs, this multiple assumes sustained execution aligned with the modest yet steady revenue growth trajectory of 5.9% year-over-year. The market appears pricing in continued margin expansion given the high net profit conversion, but the elevated P/E suggests limited room for error if top-line acceleration fails to materialize beyond the single-digit growth rate observed recently.
Insider flow over the last ninety days remains neutral with zero activity, offering no clear directional signal from management regarding capital allocation or confidence levels in near-term prospects. The convergence of strong quality scores and elevated valuation creates a scenario where downside protection is provided by fundamental durability, yet upside potential may be capped until growth rates accelerate to justify the current multiple expansion.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 7.7% | 9.7% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $139 | $96 | $70 |
| 3% | $181 | $114 | $78 |
| 4% | $264 | $141 | $90 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.7%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $114 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MCHI or IEMG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell 9988.HK shares regardless of 9988.HK's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to 9988.HK through 2 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in 9988.HK to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If 9988.HK (9988.HK) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Tencent Holdings Ltd (0700.HK) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with 9988.HK. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
9988.HK Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest 9988.HK Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
9988.HK Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does 9988.HK convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
9988.HK converts 37% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 63% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.9% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare 9988.HK to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.