First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAG trades at 59.6x earnings — a 62% premium to its sector average of 36.7x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 4.5 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). Beneish M-Score of -1.94 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of First Majestic Silver Corp. present a dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and modest capital efficiency. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and Beneish M-Score of -1.94 suggest strong financial health with low earnings manipulation risk, the DuPont decomposition reveals that returns are driven primarily by high net margins rather than asset turnover or leverage; specifically, a 0.27x asset turnover indicates significant capital intensity in this basic materials sector context. The ROIC spread sits at just 7.6%, which is notably compressed relative to the implied growth required to sustain current valuations, suggesting that while profitability per dollar of revenue remains robust at 13.0%, the company's ability to generate excess returns on invested capital is currently limited.
Valuation metrics indicate a significant premium over both historical norms and sector peers, with a current P/E of 59.6x compared against a sector average of 37.3x. This multiple expansion appears priced in anticipation of sustained revenue growth, evidenced by the reported 124.5% year-over-year increase; however, such rapid scaling often compresses margins or requires substantial reinvestment that may not be immediately reflected in bottom-line performance. The divergence between these market expectations and a DCF-derived fair value of $12 suggests the stock is trading at an implied growth rate far exceeding what current cash flows can support without drastic margin expansion or efficiency gains, creating a scenario where downside risk from mean reversion competes with upside potential if operational leverage materializes faster than modeled.
No specific data regarding Fama-French alpha, insider activity, or recent risk factor deltas was provided to complete the full risk/reward synthesis; consequently, the analysis relies solely on the disconnect between elevated valuation multiples and moderate capital efficiency metrics. The market's willingness to pay nearly 60 times earnings implies confidence in future commodity price cycles or operational improvements that are not yet evident in current ROIC generation, leaving investors to weigh the probability of sustained high growth against the likelihood of a multiple contraction if execution lags behind expectations.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 14.5% | 16.5% | 18.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $13 | $11 | $10 |
| 3% | $14 | $12 | $10 |
| 4% | $15 | $12 | $11 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=16.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $12 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VSGX or SPDW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AG shares regardless of First Majestic Silver Corp.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $12M of passive capital is structurally linked to AG through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AG's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in First Majestic Silver Corp. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (2330) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with AG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
AG Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest AG Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
AG Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does First Majestic Silver Corp. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
First Majestic Silver Corp. converts 46% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 54% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-8.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 2,400 | $23.98 | $57,552 |
| 2026-05-11 | 51,151 | $21.86 | $1.1M |
| 2026-05-07 | 588 | $21.18 | $12,453.84 |
| 2026-05-06 | 8,496 | $19.10 | $162,273.6 |
| 2026-05-05 | 97,139 | $19.38 | $1.9M |
| 2026-05-01 | 62,242 | $19.71 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-27 | 2 | $20.56 | $41.12 |
| 2026-04-23 | 149 | $20.91 | $3,115.59 |
| 2026-04-22 | 18,760 | $20.08 | $376,700.8 |
| 2026-04-20 | 66,528 | $21.49 | $1.4M |
| 2026-04-17 | 1 | $21.05 | $21.05 |
| 2026-04-14 | 131,555 | $20.78 | $2.7M |
| 2026-04-10 | 70,881 | $20.59 | $1.5M |
| 2026-04-06 | 1,000 | $21.84 | $21,840 |
| 2026-03-30 | 18,311 | $20.68 | $378,671.48 |
| 2026-03-27 | 2,992 | $19.32 | $57,805.44 |
| 2026-03-23 | 232,536 | $18.27 | $4.2M |
| 2026-03-20 | 81,309 | $18.95 | $1.5M |
| 2026-03-19 | 2,048 | $20.35 | $41,676.8 |
| 2026-03-17 | 230,748 | $22.21 | $5.1M |
| 2026-03-16 | 80,180 | $22.56 | $1.8M |
| 2026-03-12 | 150,063 | $25.71 | $3.9M |
| 2026-03-11 | 84,198 | $26.72 | $2.2M |
| 2026-03-09 | 10,303 | $25.83 | $266,126.49 |
| 2026-03-06 | 392,473 | $26.27 | $10.3M |
| 2026-03-05 | 9,333 | $28.65 | $267,390.45 |
| 2026-03-04 | 17,300 | $28.37 | $490,801 |
| 2026-03-02 | 108,183 | $32.01 | $3.5M |
| 2026-02-27 | 2,300 | $31.10 | $71,530 |
| 2026-02-23 | 10,820 | $27.55 | $298,091 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare AG to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.