Basic Materials

First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG)

$10.0B
Market Cap
59.6
P/E Ratio
1.97
Beta
0.11%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 4.5 SafeBeneish M -1.94 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -8.8%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

AG trades at 59.6x earnings — a 62% premium to its sector average of 36.7x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 4.5 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). Beneish M-Score of -1.94 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of First Majestic Silver Corp. present a dichotomy between aggressive top-line expansion and modest capital efficiency. While the Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and Beneish M-Score of -1.94 suggest strong financial health with low earnings manipulation risk, the DuPont decomposition reveals that returns are driven primarily by high net margins rather than asset turnover or leverage; specifically, a 0.27x asset turnover indicates significant capital intensity in this basic materials sector context. The ROIC spread sits at just 7.6%, which is notably compressed relative to the implied growth required to sustain current valuations, suggesting that while profitability per dollar of revenue remains robust at 13.0%, the company's ability to generate excess returns on invested capital is currently limited.

Valuation metrics indicate a significant premium over both historical norms and sector peers, with a current P/E of 59.6x compared against a sector average of 37.3x. This multiple expansion appears priced in anticipation of sustained revenue growth, evidenced by the reported 124.5% year-over-year increase; however, such rapid scaling often compresses margins or requires substantial reinvestment that may not be immediately reflected in bottom-line performance. The divergence between these market expectations and a DCF-derived fair value of $12 suggests the stock is trading at an implied growth rate far exceeding what current cash flows can support without drastic margin expansion or efficiency gains, creating a scenario where downside risk from mean reversion competes with upside potential if operational leverage materializes faster than modeled.

No specific data regarding Fama-French alpha, insider activity, or recent risk factor deltas was provided to complete the full risk/reward synthesis; consequently, the analysis relies solely on the disconnect between elevated valuation multiples and moderate capital efficiency metrics. The market's willingness to pay nearly 60 times earnings implies confidence in future commodity price cycles or operational improvements that are not yet evident in current ROIC generation, leaving investors to weigh the probability of sustained high growth against the likelihood of a multiple contraction if execution lags behind expectations.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →14.5%16.5%18.5%
2%$13$11$10
3%$14$12$10
4%$15$12$11

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=16.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $12 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

59.6x
AG P/E
36.7x
Sector Avg
+62%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
4.5
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-1.94
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

35.6%
Gross Margin
13.0%
Net Margin
7.6%
ROIC
16.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -8.8%— Negative spread.
+124.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+261.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
310.4M
Free Cash Flow
3%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition

Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.

13.0%
Net Profit Margin
NI ÷ Revenue
×
0.27x
Asset Turnover
Revenue ÷ Assets
×
1.48x
Equity Multiplier
Assets ÷ Equity
=
5.2%
Return on Equity
Balanced ROE composition across margins, turnover, and leverage.

Balance Sheet Health

0.48x
Debt / Equity
2.60x
Current Ratio
27.7x
Interest Coverage
-0.7x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.27%
FCF Yield
674.6M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.08
Act: $0.05
-40.0%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.05
Act: $0.04
-20.0%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.08
Act: $0.07
-12.5%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.23
Act: $0.30
+30.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

16.6
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.60
Price/Book
26M
Avg Volume
$32.04
52W High
$5.19
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$12M
Tracked Passive Exposure
2
ETFs Holding AG
0.03%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$41B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VSGX or SPDW, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AG shares regardless of First Majestic Silver Corp.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $12M of passive capital is structurally linked to AG through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AG's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in First Majestic Silver Corp. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AG Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AGEpicenterSPDWETFVSGXETF2330UnknownSMSNUnknownA000660Unknown005930UnknownASMLLow Risk
AG Price Drop (%)0

If First Majestic Silver Corp. (AG) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (2330) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with AG. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AG Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AG

ETFs with Highest AG Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

AG Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does First Majestic Silver Corp. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$310M
EBITDA
$675M
FCF Conversion
46%
Reinvestment Rate
54%
46% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
7.6%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-8.8%

First Majestic Silver Corp. converts 46% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 54% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-8.8%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-142,400$23.98$57,552
2026-05-1151,151$21.86$1.1M
2026-05-07588$21.18$12,453.84
2026-05-068,496$19.10$162,273.6
2026-05-0597,139$19.38$1.9M
2026-05-0162,242$19.71$1.2M
2026-04-272$20.56$41.12
2026-04-23149$20.91$3,115.59
2026-04-2218,760$20.08$376,700.8
2026-04-2066,528$21.49$1.4M
2026-04-171$21.05$21.05
2026-04-14131,555$20.78$2.7M
2026-04-1070,881$20.59$1.5M
2026-04-061,000$21.84$21,840
2026-03-3018,311$20.68$378,671.48
2026-03-272,992$19.32$57,805.44
2026-03-23232,536$18.27$4.2M
2026-03-2081,309$18.95$1.5M
2026-03-192,048$20.35$41,676.8
2026-03-17230,748$22.21$5.1M
2026-03-1680,180$22.56$1.8M
2026-03-12150,063$25.71$3.9M
2026-03-1184,198$26.72$2.2M
2026-03-0910,303$25.83$266,126.49
2026-03-06392,473$26.27$10.3M
2026-03-059,333$28.65$267,390.45
2026-03-0417,300$28.37$490,801
2026-03-02108,183$32.01$3.5M
2026-02-272,300$31.10$71,530
2026-02-2310,820$27.55$298,091

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare AG to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.