Alight, Inc. (ALIT)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicBelow-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 3/9.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $16 | $11 | $8 |
| 3% | $19 | $13 | $9 |
| 4% | $24 | $15 | $10 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $13 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Alight, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Alight, Inc. (ALIT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ALIT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ALIT Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ALIT Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 38,989 | $0.79 | $30,801.31 |
| 2026-05-13 | 23,391 | $0.73 | $17,075.43 |
| 2026-05-11 | 141,871 | $0.94 | $133,358.74 |
| 2026-04-13 | 25,501 | $0.58 | $14,790.58 |
| 2026-04-02 | 45,530 | $0.58 | $26,407.4 |
| 2026-04-01 | 28,368 | $0.58 | $16,453.44 |
| 2026-03-31 | 1,555 | $0.56 | $870.8 |
| 2026-03-30 | 1,555 | $0.54 | $839.7 |
| 2026-03-26 | 120,676 | $0.54 | $65,165.04 |
| 2026-03-23 | 35,501 | $0.68 | $24,140.68 |
| 2026-03-09 | 1 | $0.93 | $0.93 |
| 2026-03-05 | 69,968 | $0.96 | $67,169.28 |
| 2026-02-24 | 1,795 | $0.72 | $1,292.4 |
| 2026-02-20 | 233,637 | $0.81 | $189,245.97 |
| 2026-02-11 | 78,533 | $1.51 | $118,584.83 |
| 2026-02-06 | 55 | $1.55 | $85.25 |
| 2025-12-22 | 27,199 | $1.94 | $52,766.06 |
| 2025-12-18 | 24,648 | $2.12 | $52,253.76 |
| 2025-12-15 | 25 | $2.11 | $52.75 |
| 2025-12-12 | 900 | $2.13 | $1,917 |
| 2025-12-10 | 20 | $2.12 | $42.4 |
| 2025-12-05 | 335 | $2.16 | $723.6 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ALIT to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.