Healthcare

Artivion, Inc. (AORT)

$1.7B
Market Cap
166.9
P/E Ratio
1.64
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 3.2 SafeBeneish M -2.41 CleanROIC−WACC -9.4%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

AORT trades at 166.9x earnings — a 156% premium to its sector average of 65.2x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.2 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency for Artivion, Inc. presents a stark divergence from its earnings generation capabilities; while the DuPont decomposition highlights robust gross margins at 64.4% and respectable revenue growth of 13.6%, the return on invested capital sits at merely 4.2%. This figure falls significantly below the weighted average cost of capital of 13.6%, creating a negative ROIC-WACC spread of -9.4% that suggests value destruction rather than creation despite top-line expansion. Although fundamental quality indicators such as a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.41 signal strong financial health with low earnings manipulation risk, the Altman Z-Score of 3.2 indicates a moderate buffer against bankruptcy rather than a fortress balance sheet. The core economic narrative is one where high profitability on sales fails to translate into efficient capital deployment relative to the cost of funds.

Valuation metrics reflect extreme market pricing that diverges sharply from historical norms and sector peers. With a current price-to-earnings ratio of 166.9x, the stock trades at more than four times the median multiple for its healthcare sector average of 37.5x. This substantial premium implies that investors are anticipating sustained acceleration in free cash flow conversion or expecting a significant re-rating of growth assumptions to justify such an expensive entry point. The disconnect between the modest net margin of 2.2% and the exorbitant valuation multiple suggests the market is pricing in future operational leverage or strategic shifts not yet realized in current earnings, creating a wide gap between intrinsic value drivers and observed market price.

The risk-reward profile appears skewed heavily toward downside volatility given the negative spread on capital efficiency combined with an elevated valuation ceiling. While the low Beneish M-Score mitigates concerns regarding accounting irregularities, the fundamental inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital poses a structural headwind for long-term shareholder value accretion unless operational dynamics improve dramatically. The combination of a stretched multiple and negative economic spread indicates that any failure in growth execution or margin expansion would likely trigger a severe re-rating, as there is little valuation cushion to absorb fundamental deterioration.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

166.9x
AORT P/E
65.2x
Sector Avg
+156%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
3.2
Altman Z-Score
Safe Zone — above 3.0 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.41
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

64.4%
Gross Margin
2.2%
Net Margin
4.2%
ROIC
13.6%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -9.4%— Negative spread.
+13.6%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+173.1%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
839000.00
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.97x
Debt / Equity
3.53x
Current Ratio
1.6x
Interest Coverage
2.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
0.05%
FCF Yield
63.8M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.04
Act: $0.06
+33.3%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $0.12
Act: $0.24
+92.0%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.15
Act: $0.16
+5.3%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $0.18
Act: $0.17
-3.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

30.3
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.74
Price/Book
385308
Avg Volume
$48.25
52W High
$21.97
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$19M
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding AORT
0.04%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$50B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XHE or SLYG, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AORT shares regardless of Artivion, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $19M of passive capital is structurally linked to AORT through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AORT's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Artivion, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

AORT Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
AORTEpicenterVHTETFSPSMETFSPTMETFLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskABBVMed RiskUNHMed RiskMRKLow Risk
AORT Price Drop (%)0

If Artivion, Inc. (AORT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with AORT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

AORT Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
AORT

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

AORT Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Artivion, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$839,000
EBITDA
$64M
FCF Conversion
1%
Reinvestment Rate
99%
1% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
4.2%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-9.4%

Artivion, Inc. converts 1% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a low conversion rate suggesting heavy reinvestment. This may indicate a growth phase (building capacity) or structural capital intensity. The 99% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-9.4%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-04-08121$35.22$4,261.62
2026-03-252,665$35.70$95,140.5
2026-03-238$35.31$282.48
2026-03-1716,174$37.40$604,907.6
2026-03-0627$37.86$1,022.22
2026-02-2085,352$38.00$3.2M
2026-01-0540$44.46$1,778.4
2025-12-26195$46.89$9,143.55
2025-12-0415,315$45.48$696,526.2
2025-11-172,941$45.70$134,403.7
2025-11-142,942$45.59$134,125.78

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare AORT to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.