Ares Management Corporation (ARES)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicARES trades at 63.8x earnings — a 232% premium to its sector average of 19.2x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 1.5.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company demonstrates robust fundamental quality with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -0.44, signaling strong financial health without significant earnings manipulation risks. The DuPont decomposition reveals that return on equity is primarily driven by high operating leverage rather than asset efficiency; specifically, the combination of a 9.4% net margin with an equity multiplier of 3.30x generates a 6.1% ROE, while low asset turnover at 0.20x suggests a capital-intensive or service-oriented business model. Although revenue growth has accelerated sharply to 44.2% year-over-year and gross margins remain healthy at 54.2%, the return on invested capital of only 7.7% indicates that current profitability does not yet fully compensate for the deployed capital base, creating a divergence between top-line expansion and bottom-side efficiency.
Valuation metrics reflect aggressive market expectations, with the current price-to-earnings ratio of 63.8x significantly elevated relative to historical norms and sector averages, implying that investors are pricing in substantial future growth rates exceeding consensus estimates. The disconnect between this premium multiple and a discounted cash flow fair value of $261 suggests the stock is trading at a steep discount to its intrinsic model valuation if current growth trajectories persist; however, such a wide gap often indicates either overreaction or hidden risks not captured in standard DCF assumptions. This disparity highlights that the market's willingness to pay 63.8x earnings relies heavily on the sustainability of the observed 44.2% revenue expansion rather than mature cash flow generation.
Recent insider activity shows $497,555 net buying over the past 90 days, which may signal management confidence in future prospects despite the stretched valuation multiple. While this insider support provides a positive sentiment delta, it must be weighed against the inherent risk of purchasing at such high multiples where even minor growth deceleration could trigger significant mean reversion. The synthesis of strong qualitative scores and active buying contrasts with the quantitative pressure from an expensive P/E ratio, leaving the risk-reward profile contingent on whether actual earnings can justify the current premium valuation in upcoming quarters.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 9.9% | 11.9% | 13.9% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $315 | $237 | $186 |
| 3% | $357 | $261 | $201 |
| 4% | $413 | $292 | $219 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=11.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $261 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Insider Activity (Last 90 Days)
Open-market buys vs sells by company insiders. Source: yfinance.
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VOT or HDV, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ARES shares regardless of Ares Management Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $3.8B of passive capital is structurally linked to ARES through 8 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Ares Management Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Ares Management Corporation (ARES) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B (BRK.B) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ARES. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 26 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ARES Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ARES Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 26 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ARES Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Ares Management Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Ares Management Corporation converts 139% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.2%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-07 | 85,668 | $123.86 | $10.6M |
| 2026-05-05 | 92,174 | $119.98 | $11.1M |
| 2026-04-28 | 48,414 | $112.18 | $5.4M |
| 2026-04-20 | 2,935 | $117.78 | $345,684.3 |
| 2026-03-30 | 500 | $106.28 | $53,140 |
| 2026-03-25 | 20 | $106.04 | $2,120.8 |
| 2026-03-23 | 22 | $105.87 | $2,329.14 |
| 2026-03-17 | 2,616 | $100.51 | $262,934.16 |
| 2026-03-16 | 2,679 | $101.76 | $272,615.04 |
| 2026-03-12 | 70,072 | $103.46 | $7.2M |
| 2026-03-04 | 987 | $112.65 | $111,185.55 |
| 2026-03-02 | 27,169 | $112.01 | $3.0M |
| 2026-02-27 | 23,299 | $118.08 | $2.8M |
| 2026-02-26 | 23,141 | $119.18 | $2.8M |
| 2026-02-25 | 28,837 | $117.16 | $3.4M |
| 2026-02-24 | 23 | $114.57 | $2,635.11 |
| 2026-02-20 | 96 | $129.85 | $12,465.6 |
| 2026-02-18 | 28,562 | $130.41 | $3.7M |
| 2026-02-12 | 69 | $137.38 | $9,479.22 |
| 2026-02-05 | 757 | $137.22 | $103,875.54 |
| 2026-01-29 | 6,614 | $149.80 | $990,777.2 |
| 2026-01-23 | 1,314 | $161.52 | $212,237.28 |
| 2026-01-22 | 11,744 | $162.34 | $1.9M |
| 2026-01-21 | 104,572 | $163.16 | $17.1M |
| 2026-01-20 | 32 | $169.69 | $5,430.08 |
| 2026-01-14 | 1,592 | $169.21 | $269,382.32 |
| 2026-01-13 | 5,501 | $174.29 | $958,769.29 |
| 2026-01-12 | 9 | $175.91 | $1,583.19 |
| 2026-01-06 | 299 | $172.05 | $51,442.95 |
| 2026-01-05 | 343 | $166.33 | $57,051.19 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ARES to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.