Aris Mining Corporation (ARIS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicARIS trades at 42.3x earnings, roughly in line with its sector average of 36.7x. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 2.8.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Aris Mining Corporation present a distinct divergence between operational momentum and capital efficiency. Despite an impressive revenue expansion rate of 81.7% year-over-year, supported by robust gross margins near 50%, the company's return on invested capital sits at 8.8%, which falls significantly short of its weighted average cost of capital at 14.8%. This -6.0% spread indicates that current operations are destroying value relative to the capital employed, a dynamic often exacerbated by high leverage in DuPont ROE decompositions when returns fail to cover funding costs. While qualitative indicators such as a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a low Beneish M-Score of -2.44 suggest sound financial health and limited earnings manipulation risk, the Altman Z-Score of 2.8 places the firm in the grey zone regarding bankruptcy probability, signaling potential liquidity stress despite its profitability metrics.
Valuation multiples reflect aggressive market pricing for this growth trajectory, with a current P/E ratio of 42.3x trading above the sector average of 37.1x. This premium implies that investors are anticipating sustained acceleration in earnings power to justify the elevated multiple. However, fundamental analysis via discounted cash flow models suggests a fair value of $6 per share; without specific historical context or implied growth rates provided for this calculation, it remains an isolated data point indicating whether current market prices align with intrinsic worth based on projected free cash flows. The gap between the high revenue velocity and the sub-optimal ROIC-WACC spread raises questions about whether the market is pricing in a structural improvement in capital allocation efficiency that has not yet materialized in earnings per share.
The risk-reward profile hinges on the sustainability of this growth without further erosion of capital returns or an increase in financial distress signaled by the Altman Z-Score. While the low Beneish score mitigates concerns regarding accounting irregularities, the negative value spread and borderline insolvency metrics create a volatile environment where downside protection is thin if revenue growth decelerates. Investors must weigh whether the 81.7% top-line surge can eventually drive ROIC above the WACC hurdle to unlock shareholder value or if the current valuation embeds optimistic assumptions that ignore the capital destruction evident in the spread analysis.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 12.8% | 14.8% | 16.8% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $6 | $5 | $4 |
| 3% | $7 | $6 | $5 |
| 4% | $7 | $6 | $5 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=14.8%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $6 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like VSS or GWX, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ARIS shares regardless of Aris Mining Corporation's individual fundamentals. We estimate $16M of passive capital is structurally linked to ARIS through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ARIS's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Aris Mining Corporation to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Aris Mining Corporation (ARIS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies SAMSUNG ELECTR GDR REG S (SMSN) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ARIS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ARIS Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ARIS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ARIS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Aris Mining Corporation convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Aris Mining Corporation converts 43% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 57% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-6.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 9,981 | $20.41 | $203,712.21 |
| 2026-05-12 | 1,604 | $20.18 | $32,368.72 |
| 2026-05-08 | 3,950 | $19.01 | $75,089.5 |
| 2026-05-06 | 22,791 | $17.29 | $394,056.39 |
| 2026-05-05 | 313 | $17.52 | $5,483.76 |
| 2026-05-04 | 6,276 | $17.87 | $112,152.12 |
| 2026-05-01 | 392 | $17.89 | $7,012.88 |
| 2026-04-30 | 57,589 | $17.33 | $998,017.37 |
| 2026-04-28 | 13,849 | $18.76 | $259,807.24 |
| 2026-04-23 | 976 | $19.23 | $18,768.48 |
| 2026-04-21 | 12,031 | $20.83 | $250,605.73 |
| 2026-04-20 | 6,221 | $20.96 | $130,392.16 |
| 2026-04-16 | 2,133 | $20.29 | $43,278.57 |
| 2026-04-14 | 2,979 | $20.76 | $61,844.04 |
| 2026-04-13 | 740 | $20.74 | $15,347.6 |
| 2026-04-10 | 119,955 | $20.45 | $2.5M |
| 2026-04-09 | 318 | $20.62 | $6,557.16 |
| 2026-04-08 | 103 | $20.12 | $2,072.36 |
| 2026-04-07 | 22,677 | $19.30 | $437,666.1 |
| 2026-04-06 | 6,746 | $19.31 | $130,265.26 |
| 2026-04-02 | 4,200 | $19.61 | $82,362 |
| 2026-03-30 | 22,592 | $17.14 | $387,226.88 |
| 2026-03-26 | 5,829 | $17.48 | $101,890.92 |
| 2026-03-25 | 45,851 | $16.73 | $767,087.23 |
| 2026-03-23 | 500 | $16.11 | $8,055 |
| 2026-03-20 | 85,650 | $16.74 | $1.4M |
| 2026-03-19 | 3,165 | $17.65 | $55,862.25 |
| 2026-03-16 | 2,394 | $18.58 | $44,480.52 |
| 2026-03-10 | 785 | $19.32 | $15,166.2 |
| 2026-03-09 | 810 | $19.33 | $15,657.3 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ARIS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.