Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 12.6x earnings — a 81% discount to the sector average of 65.0x — ARW is in the lower valuation range. Financial health is average: Piotroski 4/9, Altman Z 2.0. Beneish M-Score of -2.03 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Arrow Electronics reveal a capital allocation challenge where the return on invested capital of 7.2% falls short of the weighted average cost of capital at 8.8%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value erosion rather than creation. This dynamic is reinforced by a DuPont-style view indicating thin profitability, with net margins compressed to just 1.8% despite gross margins holding steady at 11.2%; while revenue growth remains robust at 10.5%, the low margin structure limits earnings power relative to sales expansion. Quality metrics present a mixed signal: the Beneish M-Score of -2.03 indicates strong financial health with minimal likelihood of manipulation, yet the Altman Z-Score of 2.0 and Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 highlight elevated distress risk and mediocre fundamental strength compared to high-quality peers.
Valuation metrics display a significant divergence between this stock and its sector benchmarks, trading at a current P/E multiple of 12.6x versus a technology sector average of 58.2x. This substantial discount implies the market is pricing in persistent execution risks or fears regarding margin compression rather than simply rewarding growth potential. While the implied growth rate embedded within this low multiple appears conservative relative to the reported 10.5% revenue expansion, the negative ROIC-WACC spread suggests that even with current growth rates, the company may struggle to generate excess returns on new capital deployments unless operating leverage improves significantly or cost structures are optimized.
The risk-reward profile is further complicated by conflicting quality indicators; while the low Beneish score offers some assurance regarding earnings integrity, the proximity of the Altman Z-Score to the distress threshold necessitates caution regarding liquidity and solvency under stress scenarios. Investors must weigh whether the current valuation discount adequately compensates for the capital efficiency drag evidenced by the negative spread or if it reflects a permanent structural disadvantage in an industry demanding higher margins.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like MDYV or VFVA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ARW shares regardless of Arrow Electronics, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $726M of passive capital is structurally linked to ARW through 8 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ARW's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 8 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Arrow Electronics, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Arrow Electronics, Inc. (ARW) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies RELIANCE INC (RS) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ARW. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 12 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ARW Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ARW Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 12 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ARW Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Arrow Electronics, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Arrow Electronics, Inc. converts -3% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 103% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-1.7%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-12 | 3,182 | $202.56 | $644,545.92 |
| 2026-05-11 | 3,100 | $194.95 | $604,345 |
| 2026-05-08 | 3,193 | $189.83 | $606,127.19 |
| 2026-05-06 | 153 | $186.41 | $28,520.73 |
| 2026-05-01 | 9 | $187.83 | $1,690.47 |
| 2026-04-29 | 885 | $184.02 | $162,857.7 |
| 2026-04-28 | 291 | $186.51 | $54,274.41 |
| 2026-04-23 | 172 | $181.54 | $31,224.88 |
| 2026-04-20 | 136 | $174.97 | $23,795.92 |
| 2026-04-15 | 2 | $173.66 | $347.32 |
| 2026-04-10 | 13,648 | $157.43 | $2.1M |
| 2026-04-08 | 102 | $147.76 | $15,071.52 |
| 2026-04-07 | 739 | $147.23 | $108,802.97 |
| 2026-04-06 | 369 | $145.85 | $53,818.65 |
| 2026-04-02 | 650 | $146.63 | $95,309.5 |
| 2026-04-01 | 965 | $143.41 | $138,390.65 |
| 2026-03-25 | 512 | $144.24 | $73,850.88 |
| 2026-03-23 | 137 | $136.64 | $18,719.68 |
| 2026-03-17 | 165 | $141.03 | $23,269.95 |
| 2026-03-13 | 365 | $140.53 | $51,293.45 |
| 2026-03-11 | 256 | $139.96 | $35,829.76 |
| 2026-03-06 | 111 | $143.13 | $15,887.43 |
| 2026-02-23 | 455 | $157.03 | $71,448.65 |
| 2026-02-20 | 4 | $153.88 | $615.52 |
| 2026-02-19 | 85 | $153.03 | $13,007.55 |
| 2026-02-13 | 1,245 | $155.64 | $193,771.8 |
| 2026-02-10 | 71 | $158.11 | $11,225.81 |
| 2026-02-06 | 738 | $141.10 | $104,131.8 |
| 2026-02-03 | 122 | $133.62 | $16,301.64 |
| 2026-02-02 | 499 | $132.49 | $66,112.51 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ARW to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.