ASML.AS (ASML.AS)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 10.9 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe company exhibits exceptional fundamental quality, characterized by a robust ROIC-WACC spread of 21.1%, indicating highly efficient capital allocation relative to its cost of equity. This superior return is driven primarily by expansive net margins at 29.4% rather than operational leverage or balance sheet risk; the DuPont decomposition reveals that while asset turnover sits modestly at 0.65x and financial leverage provides a multiplier of only 2.58x, the margin profile dominates the 49.0% ROE generation. Integrity metrics further reinforce this view, with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 signaling strong financial health, an Altman Z-Score of 10.9 suggesting negligible bankruptcy risk, and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.84 that points to low earnings manipulation probability.
Despite these operational strengths, the current valuation presents a significant premium, trading at a P/E ratio of 47.5x which must be weighed against historical norms and sector averages not provided in the dataset. The market appears to price in substantial future growth, as reflected by the reported revenue expansion of 15.6% year-over-year; however, this multiple implies that current earnings are fully valued or exceeded based on a DCF fair value calculation of $667. Any deviation from the implied growth assumptions embedded within such a high multiple could materially compress valuation multiples, creating potential downside volatility if execution falters relative to these aggressive expectations.
No specific risk factor deltas, insider trading activity, or Fama-French alpha data were provided in the input to refine the risk-reward profile further. Consequently, the investment thesis rests entirely on whether the company can sustain its margin expansion and revenue growth trajectory to justify the current premium valuation without relying on leverage increases or significant turnover improvements.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 11.5% | 13.5% | 15.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $767 | $624 | $525 |
| 3% | $836 | $667 | $554 |
| 4% | $923 | $719 | $587 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=13.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $667 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
DuPont Analysis — ROE Decomposition
Breaking down Return on Equity to see how the company generates its ROE — efficiency, margins, or leverage.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like EZU or DWM, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ASML.AS shares regardless of ASML.AS's individual fundamentals. We estimate $673M of passive capital is structurally linked to ASML.AS through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ASML.AS's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in ASML.AS to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If ASML.AS (ASML.AS) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Siemens AG (SIE.DE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ASML.AS. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ASML.AS Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ASML.AS Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ASML.AS Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does ASML.AS convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
ASML.AS converts 88% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 21.1% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare ASML.AS to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.