Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 6.8x earnings — a 90% discount to the sector average of 65.2x — AUPH is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 6.9 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold). Beneish M-Score of 8.64 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency for Aurinia Pharmaceuticals is neutral, as the return on invested capital exactly matches the weighted average cost of capital, resulting in a zero spread that indicates no economic value creation from existing assets. Despite this lack of margin expansion relative to financing costs, profitability metrics are robust with net margins exceeding 100% and gross margins near 89%, suggesting strong pricing power or low variable costs typical of specialized pharmaceuticals. Financial stability appears solid given an Altman Z-Score of 6.9 well above the distress threshold, while a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals healthy fundamental strength; however, the Beneish M-Score of 8.64 warrants scrutiny regarding potential earnings manipulation risks that contradicts the otherwise positive operational trajectory.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence between current market pricing and intrinsic value estimates derived from discounted cash flow analysis. Trading at approximately 6.8x forward earnings is markedly depressed compared to the sector average of 37.5x, implying the market may be over-penalizing the stock relative to its peers or discounting future growth prospects aggressively. The DCF model suggests a fair value of $22 per share, which would require substantial appreciation from current levels if realized, yet this premium assumes the company can sustain revenue growth rates near 20% annually while overcoming the capital efficiency gap where ROIC fails to outpace WACC.
The risk-reward profile is characterized by high volatility potential driven by a wide valuation compression against sector norms and specific integrity concerns flagged by the elevated Beneish M-Score. While the low multiple offers an attractive entry point for investors betting on mean reversion toward the $22 fair value, the zero ROIC-WACC spread indicates that future share price appreciation must rely entirely on increased leverage or asset turnover rather than organic capital efficiency improvements. The combination of strong top-line growth and financial solvency contrasts sharply with the market's apparent skepticism regarding earnings quality, creating a scenario where downside protection is theoretically high but upside realization depends heavily on resolving the discrepancy between reported profitability and actual economic return on assets.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 12.2% | 14.2% | 16.2% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $25 | $20 | $17 |
| 3% | $27 | $22 | $18 |
| 4% | $30 | $23 | $19 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=14.2%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $22 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like GWX or VFMO, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell AUPH shares regardless of Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $11M of passive capital is structurally linked to AUPH through 5 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on AUPH's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 5 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. (AUPH) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with AUPH. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 5 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
AUPH Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest AUPH Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 5 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
AUPH Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc. converts 98% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 0.0% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-14 | 15,320 | $16.03 | $245,579.6 |
| 2026-05-13 | 122,310 | $15.99 | $2.0M |
| 2026-04-28 | 71,547 | $16.37 | $1.2M |
| 2026-04-21 | 720 | $15.96 | $11,491.2 |
| 2026-04-20 | 7,829 | $16.05 | $125,655.45 |
| 2026-04-17 | 7 | $15.83 | $110.81 |
| 2026-04-01 | 1,938 | $14.82 | $28,721.16 |
| 2026-03-23 | 934 | $14.02 | $13,094.68 |
| 2026-02-27 | 10,679 | $13.97 | $149,185.63 |
| 2026-02-18 | 38 | $14.31 | $543.78 |
| 2026-02-09 | 78,346 | $14.44 | $1.1M |
| 2026-02-06 | 33,518 | $14.26 | $477,966.68 |
| 2026-01-29 | 1,926 | $14.57 | $28,061.82 |
| 2026-01-28 | 1,420 | $14.57 | $20,689.4 |
| 2026-01-27 | 1,561 | $14.71 | $22,962.31 |
| 2026-01-26 | 1,700 | $14.53 | $24,701 |
| 2026-01-20 | 1,300 | $14.85 | $19,305 |
| 2026-01-15 | 311 | $15.23 | $4,736.53 |
| 2026-01-13 | 2,729 | $15.28 | $41,699.12 |
| 2026-01-09 | 6,540 | $15.33 | $100,258.2 |
| 2026-01-08 | 16,609 | $16.02 | $266,076.18 |
| 2025-12-26 | 1,800 | $16.28 | $29,304 |
| 2025-12-22 | 2,097 | $16.18 | $33,929.46 |
| 2025-12-11 | 2,345 | $15.47 | $36,277.15 |
| 2025-11-26 | 255 | $16.28 | $4,151.4 |
| 2025-11-24 | 28,380 | $15.68 | $444,998.4 |
| 2025-11-20 | 1,290 | $15.20 | $19,608 |
| 2025-11-17 | 1,797 | $15.35 | $27,583.95 |
| 2025-11-13 | 817 | $15.54 | $12,696.18 |
| 2025-11-12 | 34,077 | $15.68 | $534,327.36 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare AUPH to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.