Consumer Cyclical

Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA)

$299.0B
Market Cap
22.3
P/E Ratio
0.43
Beta
0.81%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 1.8 DistressBeneish M -2.05 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC +3.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

At 22.3x earnings — a 36% discount to the sector average of 35.0x — BABA is in the lower valuation range. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.8. Beneish M-Score of -2.05 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of Alibaba Group Holding Limited present a mixed profile characterized by robust profitability metrics offsetting modest capital efficiency. The company generates strong returns through high operational leverage, evidenced by a gross margin of 40.0% and a net margin of 13.1%, which collectively drive the DuPont ROE decomposition via superior profit margins rather than excessive leverage or asset turnover. Financial integrity is further supported by a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.05, suggesting low earnings manipulation risk, alongside a solid Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicating strong financial health. However, the capital allocation efficiency remains constrained; while the ROIC-WACC spread sits at +3.2%, an absolute ROIC of only 9.5% implies limited value creation relative to the cost of capital compared to high-growth peers. Additionally, the Altman Z-Score of 1.8 signals elevated bankruptcy risk that warrants close monitoring despite otherwise stable fundamentals.

Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing in significant future growth expectations not fully reflected in current earnings power. Trading at a P/E ratio of 22.3x against a sector average of 34.6x, the stock appears relatively undervalued within its consumer cyclical peer group, potentially offering an entry point for contrarian investors. This discount contrasts sharply with the DCF-derived fair value estimate of $162 per share; if this target is accurate and current market prices are significantly lower, it implies the market may be underestimating the company's long-term growth trajectory or failing to adequately price in its margin expansion capabilities. The divergence between the conservative multiple relative to peers and the higher implied valuation from cash flow modeling creates a tension where short-term sentiment conflicts with intrinsic value assessments.

Risk-adjusted returns appear sensitive to macroeconomic headwinds given the elevated bankruptcy risk indicated by the Altman Z-Score, which could compress margins if revenue growth fails to stabilize above 5.9%. The combination of moderate capital efficiency and heightened solvency concerns suggests that while the valuation gap offers potential upside based on DCF assumptions, the path to realizing this value is fraught with execution risks that could widen the spread between current prices and fair value estimates further before converging.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%6.3%8.3%
2%$139$128$85
3%$181$162$99
4%$264$225$119

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $162 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

22.3x
BABA P/E
35.0x
Sector Avg
-36%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.8
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.05
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

40.0%
Gross Margin
13.1%
Net Margin
9.5%
ROIC
6.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: +3.2%— Positive spread.
+5.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+62.6%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
77.5B
Free Cash Flow
38%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.66x
Debt / Equity
1.55x
Current Ratio
17.2x
Interest Coverage
0.3x
Net Debt / EBITDA
21.44%
FCF Yield
207.5B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $12.81
Act: $12.52
-2.3%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $15.47
Act: $14.75
-4.7%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $5.78
Act: $4.36
-24.5%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $10.94
Act: $7.09
-35.2%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

16.2
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.93
Price/Book
12M
Avg Volume
$192.67
52W High
$95.73
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$113M
Tracked Passive Exposure
4
ETFs Holding BABA
1.08%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$10B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XNTK or ARKF, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell BABA shares regardless of Alibaba Group Holding Limited's individual fundamentals. We estimate $113M of passive capital is structurally linked to BABA through 4 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on BABA's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 4 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in Alibaba Group Holding Limited to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

BABA Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
BABAEpicenterARKKETFARKWETFXNTKETFTSLALow RiskAMDLow RiskSHOPLow RiskHOODHigh RiskCOINLow Risk
BABA Price Drop (%)0

If Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies TESLA INC (TSLA) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with BABA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 4 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

BABA Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
BABA

Float lock-up computed from 4 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

BABA Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does Alibaba Group Holding Limited convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$77.5B
EBITDA
$207.5B
FCF Conversion
37%
Reinvestment Rate
63%
37% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
9.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
3.2%

Alibaba Group Holding Limited converts 37% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 63% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 3.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1418,090$145.81$2.6M
2026-05-114,300$140.06$602,258
2026-05-086,350$141.00$895,350
2026-05-069,054$132.26$1.2M
2026-05-05374$133.27$49,842.98
2026-05-0451,487$131.50$6.8M
2026-05-01150$131.88$19,782
2026-04-30409$130.43$53,345.87
2026-04-295,655$130.85$739,956.75
2026-04-282,384$132.52$315,927.68
2026-04-244,408$131.70$580,533.6
2026-04-222,237$135.38$302,845.06
2026-04-202,300$141.01$324,323
2026-04-1762,040$138.59$8.6M
2026-04-131,304$127.33$166,038.32
2026-04-102,002$127.68$255,615.36
2026-04-0929,550$125.32$3.7M
2026-04-0811,664$119.72$1.4M
2026-04-0721,178$122.31$2.6M
2026-04-068,719$122.05$1.1M
2026-04-02924$123.73$114,326.52
2026-04-019,342$125.46$1.2M
2026-03-31184$121.98$22,444.32
2026-03-263,664$129.87$475,843.68
2026-03-25234$125.48$29,362.32
2026-03-2014,000$124.90$1.7M
2026-03-197,852$134.43$1.1M
2026-03-1812,297$136.57$1.7M
2026-03-16173,601$135.21$23.5M
2026-03-13137,084$134.20$18.4M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare BABA to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.