BN.TO (BN.TO)

$123.5B
Market Cap
80.9
P/E Ratio
1.86
Beta
0.71%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 6/9Altman Z 0.5 DistressBeneish M -2.51 CleanROIC−WACC -4.5%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 0.5.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of the entity reveal a significant divergence between capital efficiency and profitability, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -4.5%, indicating that current operations are destroying value relative to the cost of equity. While the DuPont components suggest resilience in gross margins at 24.1% and a strong Beneish M-Score of -2.51 pointing toward low earnings manipulation risk, these strengths are undermined by a net margin contraction to 1.7% and accelerating revenue decline of -12.7%. The balance sheet quality is further flagged by an Altman Z-Score of 0.5, which signals distress territory despite the company maintaining a respectable Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 that suggests reasonable financial strength relative to peers.

Valuation metrics present a stark disconnect from underlying operational performance, with the current P/E ratio at 80.9x standing in sharp contrast to a deteriorating growth trajectory and negative capital returns. This premium multiple implies the market is pricing in substantial future recovery or transformation not yet reflected in historical cash flows, creating a scenario where earnings multiples are decoupled from fundamental value drivers like ROIC. Without evidence of margin expansion or revenue stabilization to justify such high valuation levels, the stock appears priced for a growth narrative that current fundamentals do not support.

The convergence of negative capital returns and distressed Z-Score metrics creates a pronounced risk/reward asymmetry where downside protection is limited by solvency concerns while upside remains contingent on unproven turnaround potential. Investors must weigh whether the high F-Score indicates temporary operational hurdles or if the Altman signal presages deeper structural issues that could further compress valuation multiples in subsequent periods.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

6/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
0.5
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.51
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

24.1%
Gross Margin
1.7%
Net Margin
3.8%
ROIC
8.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -4.5%— Negative spread.
-12.7%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+103.9%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-3.8B
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

2.12x
Debt / Equity
0.85x
Current Ratio
1.3x
Interest Coverage
6.4x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-1.16%
FCF Yield
31.8B
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
2.03
Price/Book
3M
Avg Volume
$68.44
52W High
$41.25
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in BN.TO to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

BN.TO Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
BN.TOEpicenterEWCETFRYHigh RiskTDHigh RiskSHOPLow RiskENB.TOHigh RiskBMO.TOHigh Risk
BN.TO Price Drop (%)0

If BN.TO (BN.TO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Royal Bank of Canada (RY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with BN.TO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

BN.TO Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
BN.TO

ETFs with Highest BN.TO Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

BN.TO Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does BN.TO convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-3,794,000,000
EBITDA
$31.8B
FCF Conversion
-12%
Reinvestment Rate
112%
-12% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
3.8%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-4.5%

BN.TO converts -12% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 112% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.5%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare BN.TO to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.