BP.L (BP.L)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicStrong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency for BP.L appears constrained, evidenced by a low ROIC of 5.1% which suggests the firm generates returns barely above risk-free rates, failing to create significant economic value despite a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 indicating robust financial health and improving fundamentals. The DuPont decomposition reveals a critical structural weakness: while gross margins sit at 17.7%, net margin is effectively zero, implying that operational leverage or heavy interest burdens are erasing profitability entirely. This disconnect between high asset turnover potential and negligible bottom-line earnings creates an environment where equity value relies heavily on balance sheet strength rather than operating performance, even as revenue growth stagnates at a mere 0.1% year-over-year.
Valuation metrics present a stark divergence between market pricing and intrinsic models; the current P/E ratio of 38.6x sits significantly elevated relative to typical energy sector multiples given the lack of earnings power, yet this premium contrasts sharply with a DCF fair value estimate of $6. This wide gap implies that the market is currently pricing in substantial future growth expectations or asset revaluation potential that are not reflected in current cash flows, potentially masking underlying operational stagnation. The discrepancy suggests investors may be anticipating a fundamental turnaround or strategic shift that could unlock the trapped equity value hidden within the company's balance sheet.
Without specific data on risk factor deltas, insider trading activity, or Fama-French alpha adjustments, the risk-reward profile remains ambiguous despite the high Piotroski score suggesting low distress probability. The combination of stagnant revenue growth and zero net margins creates a precarious operating environment where even minor cost overruns could trigger significant downside volatility against the current lofty valuation multiple.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $7 | $5 | $4 |
| 3% | $8 | $6 | $4 |
| 4% | $10 | $7 | $5 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $6 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in BP.L to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If BP.L (BP.L) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies HSBC Holdings PLC (HSBA.L) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with BP.L. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
BP.L Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest BP.L Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
BP.L Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does BP.L convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
BP.L converts 37% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 63% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare BP.L to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.