CNQ.TO (CNQ.TO)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 7/9, Altman Z 3.3 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe capital allocation efficiency demonstrates a robust spread between return on invested capital and the weighted average cost of capital, with ROIC exceeding WACC by 2.8 percentage points, indicating value creation above the hurdle rate. This profitability is underpinned by high operating leverage rather than financial engineering or asset turnover; specifically, a net margin of 24.5% drives returns while gross margins sit at 21.3%, suggesting strong pricing power within a mature business model. Financial integrity metrics further corroborate this fundamental quality: the company posts a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a Beneish M-Score of -2.46, signaling low earnings manipulation risk and solid financial health, while an Altman Z-Score of 3.3 places it in the safe zone regarding bankruptcy probability.
Valuation metrics suggest the market is pricing for modest growth rather than aggressive expansion, with revenue growing at a sequentialized annual rate of 6.4%. The current multiple of 13.6x sits significantly below typical high-quality energy peers and implies that investors are not fully discounting future cash flow potential; however, a DCF analysis points to a fair value of $31, which would necessitate an upward revision in assumptions regarding long-term growth or margin persistence to bridge the gap between current pricing and intrinsic worth. This divergence indicates that while the fundamental economics support a higher valuation multiple, the market remains conservative on forward-looking expectations.
Risk-adjusted return profiles appear favorable given the combination of high margins and low distress risk, yet the absence of specific sector beta data limits a precise assessment of Fama-French alpha generation relative to peers. The convergence of strong Piotroski scores with moderate revenue growth suggests resilience against economic downturns, though the 6.4% top-line expansion rate may constrain upside if macro conditions tighten further. Ultimately, the stock presents a profile where downside protection is anchored by superior capital efficiency and clean earnings quality, while upside depends on whether market sentiment shifts to recognize the full extent of its ROIC-WACC spread in future multiples.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8.6% | 10.6% | 12.6% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $38 | $28 | $21 |
| 3% | $44 | $31 | $23 |
| 4% | $52 | $35 | $25 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.6%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $31 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in CNQ.TO to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If CNQ.TO (CNQ.TO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Royal Bank of Canada (RY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CNQ.TO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CNQ.TO Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest CNQ.TO Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CNQ.TO Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does CNQ.TO convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
CNQ.TO converts 38% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 62% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 2.8% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare CNQ.TO to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.