Energy

CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI)

$3.5B
Market Cap
127.7
P/E Ratio
1.14
Beta
4.25%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 8/9Altman Z 2.7 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.81 CleanROIC−WACC -4.3%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

CVI trades at 127.7x earnings — a 267% premium to its sector average of 34.8x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 2.7.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The fundamental economics of CVR Energy reveal a stark divergence between operational efficiency and profitability generation. Despite a robust Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicating strong financial health and low earnings manipulation risk per the Beneish M-Score, the company is currently destroying value by generating an ROIC of just 5.0% against a WACC of 9.2%, resulting in a negative spread of -4.3%. This capital allocation inefficiency stems from razor-thin net margins at 0.4% and gross margins of only 4.7%, which fail to compensate for the company's leverage or asset turnover within the DuPont framework, while revenue contracts by 5.9% year-over-year. The Altman Z-Score of 2.7 places the firm in a gray zone regarding bankruptcy risk, suggesting that despite its solid balance sheet structure, current operating dynamics are under severe pressure to sustain solvency without margin expansion.

Valuation metrics present an extreme disconnect from historical norms and sector peers, with a current P/E multiple of 127.7x vastly exceeding the energy sector average of 30.5x. This premium pricing implies that the market is anticipating a fundamental transformation in capital efficiency or a significant re-rating of margins to justify such high multiples; however, given the negative ROIC-WACC spread and declining top-line growth, the current valuation suggests an expectation of earnings acceleration far beyond what recent operational data supports. The disparity between the low multiple relative to historical averages (if implied) versus the massive deviation from sector peers highlights a potential mispricing or aggressive forward-looking consensus that relies on assumptions not yet reflected in today's financial statements.

The risk profile is characterized by high downside volatility driven by deteriorating revenue trends and capital destruction, despite defensive indicators like the low Beneish M-Score of -2.81 signaling clean earnings. Investors must weigh the safety of a strong F-Score against the immediate threat posed by negative value creation and an unsustainable valuation gap that leaves little room for error in execution or market sentiment shifts.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Valuation Context

127.7x
CVI P/E
34.8x
Sector Avg
+267%
vs Sector

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

8/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
2.7
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.81
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

4.7%
Gross Margin
0.4%
Net Margin
5.0%
ROIC
9.3%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -4.3%— Negative spread.
-5.9%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+285.7%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-238.0M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

3.13x
Debt / Equity
1.79x
Current Ratio
1.7x
Interest Coverage
2.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-5.12%
FCF Yield
591.0M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.88
Act: $-0.58
+34.4%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $-0.13
Act: $-0.23
-75.4%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $0.23
Act: $0.40
+74.6%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.83
Act: $-0.80
+3.7%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

33.5
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
4.75
Price/Book
1M
Avg Volume
$41.67
52W High
$15.10
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$50M
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding CVI
0.10%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$50B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like XOP or VDE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CVI shares regardless of CVR Energy, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $50M of passive capital is structurally linked to CVI through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CVI's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in CVR Energy, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

CVI Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
CVIEpicenterSPSMETFVDEETFSPTMETFXOMLow RiskCVXLow RiskCOPLow RiskSMMed RiskWMBHigh Risk
CVI Price Drop (%)0

If CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CVI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

CVI Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
CVI

Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

CVI Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does CVR Energy, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-238,000,000
EBITDA
$591M
FCF Conversion
-40%
Reinvestment Rate
140%
-40% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
5.0%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-4.3%

CVR Energy, Inc. converts -40% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 140% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-131$34.39$34.39
2026-05-12538$34.88$18,765.44
2026-05-11273$33.55$9,159.15
2026-05-08398$32.58$12,966.84
2026-05-0573$34.20$2,496.6
2026-05-011,526$33.14$50,571.64
2026-04-2037,600$29.44$1.1M
2026-04-091,183$32.68$38,660.44
2026-04-07446$32.54$14,512.84
2026-04-02437$31.60$13,809.2
2026-04-0120,990$33.65$706,313.5
2026-03-311,055$34.94$36,861.7
2026-03-231,299$33.82$43,932.18
2026-03-20636$32.13$20,434.68
2026-03-19377$32.91$12,407.07
2026-03-175,254$28.22$148,267.88
2026-03-02489$24.16$11,814.24
2026-02-2581$21.71$1,758.51
2026-02-2350$20.72$1,036
2026-02-03158$22.49$3,553.42
2026-02-02158$22.74$3,592.92
2026-01-306,449$22.28$143,683.72
2026-01-1223$22.97$528.31
2025-12-246,058$26.29$159,264.82
2025-12-236,081$26.61$161,815.41
2025-12-223,471$27.56$95,660.76
2025-12-0337$34.62$1,280.94
2025-12-01100$34.53$3,453
2025-11-21115$34.34$3,949.1
2025-11-05481$36.50$17,556.5

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare CVI to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.