CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicCVI trades at 127.7x earnings — a 267% premium to its sector average of 34.8x — without a dominant ROIC-WACC spread. Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 8/9) with Altman Z of 2.7.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of CVR Energy reveal a stark divergence between operational efficiency and profitability generation. Despite a robust Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 indicating strong financial health and low earnings manipulation risk per the Beneish M-Score, the company is currently destroying value by generating an ROIC of just 5.0% against a WACC of 9.2%, resulting in a negative spread of -4.3%. This capital allocation inefficiency stems from razor-thin net margins at 0.4% and gross margins of only 4.7%, which fail to compensate for the company's leverage or asset turnover within the DuPont framework, while revenue contracts by 5.9% year-over-year. The Altman Z-Score of 2.7 places the firm in a gray zone regarding bankruptcy risk, suggesting that despite its solid balance sheet structure, current operating dynamics are under severe pressure to sustain solvency without margin expansion.
Valuation metrics present an extreme disconnect from historical norms and sector peers, with a current P/E multiple of 127.7x vastly exceeding the energy sector average of 30.5x. This premium pricing implies that the market is anticipating a fundamental transformation in capital efficiency or a significant re-rating of margins to justify such high multiples; however, given the negative ROIC-WACC spread and declining top-line growth, the current valuation suggests an expectation of earnings acceleration far beyond what recent operational data supports. The disparity between the low multiple relative to historical averages (if implied) versus the massive deviation from sector peers highlights a potential mispricing or aggressive forward-looking consensus that relies on assumptions not yet reflected in today's financial statements.
The risk profile is characterized by high downside volatility driven by deteriorating revenue trends and capital destruction, despite defensive indicators like the low Beneish M-Score of -2.81 signaling clean earnings. Investors must weigh the safety of a strong F-Score against the immediate threat posed by negative value creation and an unsustainable valuation gap that leaves little room for error in execution or market sentiment shifts.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
Passive Flow Attribution
ETF Draft EffectWhen investors buy or sell ETFs like XOP or VDE, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell CVI shares regardless of CVR Energy, Inc.'s individual fundamentals. We estimate $50M of passive capital is structurally linked to CVI through 6 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on CVI's daily trading dynamics.
Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in CVR Energy, Inc. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If CVR Energy, Inc. (CVI) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with CVI. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
CVI Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest CVI Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 7 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
CVI Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does CVR Energy, Inc. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
CVR Energy, Inc. converts -40% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 140% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-4.3%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 1 | $34.39 | $34.39 |
| 2026-05-12 | 538 | $34.88 | $18,765.44 |
| 2026-05-11 | 273 | $33.55 | $9,159.15 |
| 2026-05-08 | 398 | $32.58 | $12,966.84 |
| 2026-05-05 | 73 | $34.20 | $2,496.6 |
| 2026-05-01 | 1,526 | $33.14 | $50,571.64 |
| 2026-04-20 | 37,600 | $29.44 | $1.1M |
| 2026-04-09 | 1,183 | $32.68 | $38,660.44 |
| 2026-04-07 | 446 | $32.54 | $14,512.84 |
| 2026-04-02 | 437 | $31.60 | $13,809.2 |
| 2026-04-01 | 20,990 | $33.65 | $706,313.5 |
| 2026-03-31 | 1,055 | $34.94 | $36,861.7 |
| 2026-03-23 | 1,299 | $33.82 | $43,932.18 |
| 2026-03-20 | 636 | $32.13 | $20,434.68 |
| 2026-03-19 | 377 | $32.91 | $12,407.07 |
| 2026-03-17 | 5,254 | $28.22 | $148,267.88 |
| 2026-03-02 | 489 | $24.16 | $11,814.24 |
| 2026-02-25 | 81 | $21.71 | $1,758.51 |
| 2026-02-23 | 50 | $20.72 | $1,036 |
| 2026-02-03 | 158 | $22.49 | $3,553.42 |
| 2026-02-02 | 158 | $22.74 | $3,592.92 |
| 2026-01-30 | 6,449 | $22.28 | $143,683.72 |
| 2026-01-12 | 23 | $22.97 | $528.31 |
| 2025-12-24 | 6,058 | $26.29 | $159,264.82 |
| 2025-12-23 | 6,081 | $26.61 | $161,815.41 |
| 2025-12-22 | 3,471 | $27.56 | $95,660.76 |
| 2025-12-03 | 37 | $34.62 | $1,280.94 |
| 2025-12-01 | 100 | $34.53 | $3,453 |
| 2025-11-21 | 115 | $34.34 | $3,949.1 |
| 2025-11-05 | 481 | $36.50 | $17,556.5 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare CVI to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.