Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (DJT)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 4/9. Beneish M-Score of 4.95 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 8% | 10% | 12% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $1 | $1 | $1 |
| 3% | $2 | $1 | $1 |
| 4% | $2 | $1 | $1 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $1 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Trump Media & Technology Group Corp. (DJT) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Facebook Inc. Class A (META) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with DJT. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
DJT Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest DJT Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-13 | 21,422 | $8.73 | $187,014.06 |
| 2026-05-12 | 1,315 | $8.83 | $11,611.45 |
| 2026-05-11 | 60 | $8.93 | $535.8 |
| 2026-05-08 | 61,467 | $9.02 | $554,432.34 |
| 2026-05-07 | 2,641 | $9.10 | $24,033.1 |
| 2026-05-06 | 41,936 | $9.20 | $385,811.2 |
| 2026-05-04 | 15,344 | $9.39 | $144,080.16 |
| 2026-05-01 | 4 | $9.15 | $36.6 |
| 2026-04-29 | 186 | $9.16 | $1,703.76 |
| 2026-04-28 | 10,145 | $9.95 | $100,942.75 |
| 2026-04-27 | 4,590 | $9.35 | $42,916.5 |
| 2026-04-24 | 363 | $9.17 | $3,328.71 |
| 2026-04-22 | 102 | $9.82 | $1,001.64 |
| 2026-04-20 | 1,600 | $10.26 | $16,416 |
| 2026-04-14 | 1 | $9.60 | $9.6 |
| 2026-04-10 | 315 | $9.26 | $2,916.9 |
| 2026-04-06 | 12,165 | $9.18 | $111,674.7 |
| 2026-04-02 | 495 | $9.06 | $4,484.7 |
| 2026-04-01 | 40,872 | $9.28 | $379,292.16 |
| 2026-03-31 | 18,862 | $8.72 | $164,476.64 |
| 2026-03-30 | 32,296 | $8.47 | $273,547.12 |
| 2026-03-27 | 186,752 | $8.59 | $1.6M |
| 2026-03-26 | 14,929 | $9.19 | $137,197.51 |
| 2026-03-25 | 123,447 | $8.78 | $1.1M |
| 2026-03-24 | 260 | $9.05 | $2,353 |
| 2026-03-20 | 71,298 | $8.66 | $617,440.68 |
| 2026-03-19 | 330,211 | $9.13 | $3.0M |
| 2026-03-16 | 50,957 | $9.80 | $499,378.6 |
| 2026-03-13 | 443,741 | $9.94 | $4.4M |
| 2026-03-12 | 135,965 | $10.37 | $1.4M |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare DJT to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.