DTE.DE (DTE.DE)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicFinancial health is average: Piotroski 6/9, Altman Z 1.2.
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of DTE.DE present a mixed profile characterized by robust profitability metrics juxtaposed with significant balance sheet fragility. The company generates an ROIC-WACC spread of +1.7%, indicating value creation that exceeds the cost of capital, supported by a net margin of 8.1% and an impressive gross margin of 61.1%. However, the DuPont decomposition reveals this return is driven more likely by leverage than operational efficiency or pricing power, given the modest revenue growth of only 2.8% year-over-year. This structural concern is underscored by a deteriorating Altman Z-Score of 1.2, signaling elevated bankruptcy risk, while the Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 suggests moderate financial strength but potential weakness in recent score components such as leverage or profitability trends.
Valuation metrics suggest the market prices this entity at a multiple of 16.3x earnings, which requires context against historical norms and sector peers to determine if it represents an opportunity or a premium for its risk profile. A DCF analysis implies a fair value of $308 per share; comparing this intrinsic estimate directly against current trading levels reveals whether the stock is undervalued relative to its cash flow potential or overvalued given its specific growth constraints and capital structure risks. The convergence of low single-digit revenue expansion with high gross margins warrants scrutiny regarding sustainability, as the valuation may already be pricing in assumptions that do not align with the observed 2.8% top-line trajectory.
The risk-reward dynamic hinges on reconciling the solid return spread against the precarious solvency indicators and sluggish growth rate. While the positive ROIC-WACC spread theoretically supports shareholder value creation, the low Altman Z-Score introduces a tail-risk premium that could compress multiples or trigger distress events unrelated to core operations. Investors must weigh whether the 16.3x P/E multiple adequately compensates for the balance sheet vulnerabilities indicated by the financial scores and the limited revenue expansion headwinds inherent in the current business model.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 6% | 6.5% | 8.5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $272 | $241 | $156 |
| 3% | $360 | $308 | $183 |
| 4% | $535 | $431 | $223 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=6.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $308 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in DTE.DE to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If DTE.DE (DTE.DE) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Siemens AG (SIE.DE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with DTE.DE. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
DTE.DE Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest DTE.DE Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
DTE.DE Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does DTE.DE convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
DTE.DE converts 43% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. The 57% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 1.7% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Compare DTE.DE to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.