ENLT.TA (ENLT.TA)

$29.8B
Market Cap
68.5
P/E Ratio
0.76
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 5/9Altman Z 2.9 Gray ZoneBeneish M -2.05 Flag (> −2.22)ROIC−WACC -5.2%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Financial health is average: Piotroski 5/9, Altman Z 2.9. Beneish M-Score of -2.05 exceeds the -2.22 academic threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency for ENLT.TA presents a significant structural concern, as the return on invested capital of 3.7% falls sharply below the weighted average cost of capital at 8.9%, creating a negative spread of -5.2%. This indicates that current operations are destroying shareholder value despite impressive top-line momentum and high profitability ratios; specifically, gross margins stand at 76.9% with net margins expanding to 22.7% alongside revenue growth accelerating by 46.0% year-over-year. While the Beneish M-Score of -2.05 suggests low earnings manipulation risk and a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 reflects moderate financial strength, the Altman Z-Score of 2.9 signals elevated distress potential relative to historical norms, creating a paradoxical profile where aggressive growth metrics coexist with inefficient capital deployment that fails to cover financing costs.

Valuation multiples reflect extreme market optimism, with the current price-to-earnings ratio at 68.5x far exceeding typical benchmarks for firms exhibiting such wide negative ROIC-WACC spreads. The market appears to be pricing in a future reversion of operating leverage or an assumption that margin expansion will eventually generate returns sufficient to justify the high cost of capital, yet no explicit data supports this transition given the current -5.2% spread. This disparity between historical valuation anchors and present-day multiples implies that any deviation from the projected 46.0% revenue growth trajectory could precipitate a severe multiple compression, as the stock lacks the fundamental earnings power to sustain its premium pricing under normal economic conditions.

The risk-reward landscape is skewed heavily toward downside volatility if capital efficiency does not improve rapidly. The combination of negative value creation and an Altman Z-Score approaching the distress zone suggests that current growth rates may be unsustainable or supported by temporary factors rather than durable competitive moats. Without a clear inflection point where ROIC surpasses WACC, the high valuation leaves little margin for error regarding execution risks or macroeconomic headwinds that could impact such a leveraged growth profile.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

5/9
Piotroski F-Score
Average — mixed operational signals
2.9
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.05
Beneish M-Score
Above threshold — earnings quality may warrant further review per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

76.9%
Gross Margin
22.7%
Net Margin
3.7%
ROIC
8.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -5.2%— Negative spread.
+46.0%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+198.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-1.5B
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

3.33x
Debt / Equity
0.67x
Current Ratio
2.6x
Interest Coverage
6.9x
Net Debt / EBITDA
-4.63%
FCF Yield
480.2M
EBITDA

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

86.8
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1678.93
Price/Book
527684
Avg Volume
$24740.00
52W High
$5359.00
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in ENLT.TA to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ENLT.TA Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ENLT.TAEpicenterSCZETF5801.TLow Risk4004.TMed Risk5706.TLow RiskPLS.AXUnknownDPLM.LLow Risk
ENLT.TA Price Drop (%)0

If ENLT.TA (ENLT.TA) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Furukawa Electric Co Ltd (5801.T) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ENLT.TA. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ENLT.TA Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ENLT.TA

ETFs with Highest ENLT.TA Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ENLT.TA Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does ENLT.TA convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$-1,529,922,000
EBITDA
$480M
FCF Conversion
-319%
Reinvestment Rate
419%
-319% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
3.7%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-5.2%

ENLT.TA converts -319% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, negative FCF conversion — the company is consuming cash faster than it generates EBITDA, which is unsustainable long-term. The 419% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-5.2%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare ENLT.TA to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.