ENR.DE (ENR.DE)

$120.6B
Market Cap
65.6
P/E Ratio
1.83
Beta
0.48%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 2.2 Gray ZoneROIC−WACC -5.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 2.2.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency for this entity presents a notable divergence from traditional value investing criteria, characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of -5.0%, indicating that current returns on invested capital fail to cover the cost of financing. Despite this negative economic moat in terms of absolute return generation, earnings quality metrics remain robust; a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals strong fundamental stability and financial health, while an Altman Z-Score of 2.2 suggests a moderate buffer against bankruptcy risk. This dichotomy is further illuminated by the DuPont components: although net margins are compressed at 3.6%, they are supported by healthy gross margins of 16.8% and accelerating revenue growth of 13.4% year-over-year, implying that top-line expansion may be driving profitability despite thin operating spreads.

Valuation metrics reflect a significant premium relative to historical norms and sector peers, with the current P/E ratio standing at 65.6x. This multiple appears disconnected from the underlying capital efficiency, as the DCF model implies a fair value of $95, suggesting that market pricing may be anticipating growth rates far exceeding what is currently realized or sustainable given the negative ROIC-WACC spread. The disparity between the high valuation multiple and the sub-par return on invested capital indicates that investors are likely pricing in aggressive future margin expansion or leverage increases rather than relying on current operational economics to justify the equity cost.

While the Piotroski score offers some comfort regarding financial stability, the combination of a negative ROIC-WACC spread and an elevated P/E ratio creates a scenario where downside protection relies heavily on continued revenue acceleration. The market's willingness to assign such a high multiple despite weak capital efficiency suggests that any deviation in growth trajectory or margin compression could lead to significant mean reversion in valuation multiples, as the current price does not appear anchored by intrinsic value derived from present cash flow generation capabilities.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →13.9%15.9%17.9%
2%$106$91$79
3%$113$95$82
4%$121$100$86

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=15.9%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $95 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
2.2
Altman Z-Score
Grey Zone — between 1.8 and 3.0 thresholds. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.

Profitability & Value Creation

16.8%
Gross Margin
3.6%
Net Margin
10.9%
ROIC
15.9%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -5.0%— Negative spread.
+13.4%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+19.4%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
4.1B
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

4.31x
Debt / Equity
0.90x
Current Ratio
8.6x
Interest Coverage
-2.0x
Net Debt / EBITDA
3.65%
FCF Yield
4.2B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $0.34
Act: $0.76
+125.7%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.21
Act: $0.21
-1.1%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.33
Act: $0.32
-2.4%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $0.82
Act: $0.92
+12.3%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

25.4
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
10.71
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$171.65
52W High
$41.81
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$314M
Tracked Passive Exposure
2
ETFs Holding ENR.DE
3.00%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$10B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like EWG or EZU, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell ENR.DE shares regardless of ENR.DE's individual fundamentals. We estimate $314M of passive capital is structurally linked to ENR.DE through 2 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on ENR.DE's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 2 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in ENR.DE to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

ENR.DE Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
ENR.DEEpicenterEZUETFEWGETFSIE.DEMed RiskSAP.DELow RiskALV.DEHigh RiskASML.ASLow RiskDTE.DEHigh Risk
ENR.DE Price Drop (%)0

If ENR.DE (ENR.DE) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Siemens AG (SIE.DE) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 2 ETFs with ENR.DE. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

ENR.DE Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
ENR.DE

ETFs with Highest ENR.DE Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 0 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

ENR.DE Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does ENR.DE convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$4.1B
EBITDA
$4.2B
FCF Conversion
98%
Reinvestment Rate
2%
98% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
10.9%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-5.0%

ENR.DE converts 98% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-5.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare ENR.DE to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.