Ero Copper Corp. (ERO)
Quantitative Summary
DeterministicAt 9.9x earnings — a 73% discount to the sector average of 36.7x — ERO is in the lower valuation range. Financial health metrics are strong: Piotroski 8/9, Altman Z 3.1 (above 3.0 safe zone threshold).
Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.
Algorithmic Teardown
AI-GeneratedThe fundamental economics of Ero Copper Corp. demonstrate a robust quality profile characterized by an ROIC-WACC spread of +4.2%, indicating capital generation that comfortably exceeds the cost of equity. This efficiency is underpinned by exceptional profitability metrics, with net and gross margins at 33.6% and 43.9% respectively, driving revenue growth to 67.1%. The DuPont decomposition suggests this return on equity is primarily fueled by high margin expansion rather than financial leverage or asset turnover acceleration. Creditworthiness appears strong given an Altman Z-Score of 3.1, while the Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and Beneish M-Score of -2.57 signal robust fundamental health with minimal earnings manipulation risk.
Valuation metrics present a significant divergence from historical norms and peer averages. The current P/E ratio of 9.9x stands in stark contrast to the sector average of 37.1x, suggesting the market prices this basic materials asset at a substantial discount relative to its industry peers. Furthermore, while the DCF model implies a fair value of $9 based on projected cash flows and growth assumptions, the current trading multiple does not align with these intrinsic valuation parameters. This discrepancy indicates that either the market is pricing in severe downside risks or expects a material re-rating if future performance matches historical trends.
Risk assessment reveals no explicit data regarding Fama-French alpha generation, insider transaction activity, or specific volatility deltas within the provided dataset. Consequently, while the fundamental quality and margin expansion are compelling, the wide valuation gap relative to sector peers represents the primary uncertainty variable. The convergence of high Piotroski scores with a depressed P/E suggests potential value creation if operational growth persists, yet the lack of insider data prevents confirmation of management confidence in these near-term projections.
Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.
DCF Sandbox
InteractiveSensitivity Matrix
| TG ↓ / WACC → | 10.3% | 12.3% | 14.3% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2% | $11 | $8 | $6 |
| 3% | $12 | $9 | $6 |
| 4% | $14 | $10 | $7 |
Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs —.
Pre-computed DCF: WACC=12.3%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $9 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.
Valuation Context
Price Chart with Moving Averages
Quant Health Deep Dive
Profitability & Value Creation
Balance Sheet Health
Earnings Surprise History
EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.
Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)
How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.
Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)
How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.
Fundamentals
ETF Contagion Visualizer
Simulate a price drop in Ero Copper Corp. to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.
If Ero Copper Corp. (ERO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies MEIKO ELECTRONICS CO LTD (6787) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with ERO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.
Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 2 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.
ERO Ownership Dynamics
ETFs with Highest ERO Exposure
Float lock-up computed from 2 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).
ERO Capital Efficiency
How efficiently does Ero Copper Corp. convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.
Ero Copper Corp. converts 24% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a moderate conversion rate — significant EBITDA is consumed by capital expenditures, working capital changes, or interest payments. The 76% reinvestment rate signals aggressive capacity expansion. The positive ROIC-WACC spread of 4.2% confirms that reinvested capital creates shareholder value.
Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.
Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History
SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.
| Date | Failed Shares | Close Price | Notional Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-08 | 41 | $27.10 | $1,111.1 |
| 2026-05-07 | 11,282 | $27.07 | $305,403.74 |
| 2026-04-30 | 8,651 | $25.95 | $224,493.45 |
| 2026-04-29 | 4,831 | $26.40 | $127,538.4 |
| 2026-04-28 | 4,335 | $27.53 | $119,342.55 |
| 2026-04-27 | 20,059 | $27.31 | $547,811.29 |
| 2026-04-23 | 4 | $27.65 | $110.6 |
| 2026-04-22 | 4,091 | $26.97 | $110,334.27 |
| 2026-04-21 | 28,202 | $28.39 | $800,654.78 |
| 2026-04-20 | 2,850 | $28.95 | $82,507.5 |
| 2026-04-16 | 35,155 | $29.72 | $1.0M |
| 2026-04-14 | 7,510 | $32.12 | $241,221.2 |
| 2026-04-02 | 1,412 | $28.05 | $39,606.6 |
| 2026-03-31 | 1,383 | $24.93 | $34,478.19 |
| 2026-03-26 | 4,549 | $25.41 | $115,590.09 |
| 2026-03-23 | 9,742 | $23.59 | $229,813.78 |
| 2026-03-17 | 4,069 | $27.00 | $109,863 |
| 2026-03-12 | 7,915 | $28.00 | $221,620 |
| 2026-03-11 | 10,081 | $28.09 | $283,175.29 |
| 2026-03-10 | 3,993 | $28.20 | $112,602.6 |
| 2026-03-06 | 17,502 | $28.92 | $506,157.84 |
| 2026-03-05 | 2,097 | $31.70 | $66,474.9 |
| 2026-03-04 | 81,014 | $30.83 | $2.5M |
| 2026-03-03 | 112,997 | $33.39 | $3.8M |
| 2026-03-02 | 88,769 | $34.18 | $3.0M |
| 2026-02-27 | 4,578 | $34.42 | $157,574.76 |
| 2026-02-26 | 743 | $34.37 | $25,536.91 |
| 2026-02-25 | 770 | $33.49 | $25,787.3 |
| 2026-02-24 | 11,408 | $31.13 | $355,131.04 |
| 2026-02-23 | 1,518 | $30.15 | $45,767.7 |
Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.
Compare ERO to Peers
Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.
SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.