FATE (FATE)

Market Cap
P/E Ratio
Beta
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 1/9

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Below-average fundamentals indicated by Piotroski score of 1/9.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

1/9
Piotroski F-Score
Weak — below-average operational and profitability metrics

Profitability & Value Creation

-2051.1%
Net Margin
-41.3%
ROIC
-51.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+26.8%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
-112.0M
Free Cash Flow

Balance Sheet Health

0.54x
Debt / Equity
5.79x
Current Ratio
-134.8M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.38
Act: $-0.32
+15.7%
Q3
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.34
Act: $-0.29
+15.8%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.28
Act: $-0.27
+4.3%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $-0.27
Act: $-0.27
+0.5%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
Price/Book
Avg Volume
52W High
52W Low
52W Range Position

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in FATE to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

FATE Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
FATEEpicenterVHTETFLLYLow RiskJNJLow RiskABBVMed RiskUNHMed RiskMRKLow Risk
FATE Price Drop (%)0

If FATE (FATE) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies Eli Lilly & Co. (LLY) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with FATE. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 1 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

FATE Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
FATE

ETFs with Highest FATE Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 1 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-07121,810$2.29$278,944.9
2026-04-29497$1.30$646.1
2026-04-2836,960$1.31$48,417.6
2026-04-136,806$1.24$8,439.44
2026-03-2431$1.15$35.65
2026-03-17794$1.16$921.04
2026-02-264,127$1.48$6,107.96
2026-02-24265$1.51$400.15
2026-02-11427$1.09$465.43
2026-02-0616$1.05$16.8
2026-02-041,591$1.16$1,845.56
2025-12-311,033$0.98$1,012.34
2025-12-2911,343$1.00$11,343
2025-12-2410,539$0.98$10,328.22
2025-12-1668$1.12$76.16
2025-12-12104$1.11$115.44
2025-12-102,668$1.05$2,801.4
2025-11-242,481$1.03$2,555.43
2025-11-1416,372$0.99$16,208.28
2025-11-122,824$1.12$3,162.88
2025-11-06425,600$1.09$463,904

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare FATE to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.