FR0000120578 (FR0000120578)

$98.5B
Market Cap
20.3
P/E Ratio
0.36
Beta
5.03%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Altman Z 1.6 DistressBeneish M -2.56 CleanROIC−WACC -2.0%

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9) with Altman Z of 1.6.

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The capital allocation efficiency presents a significant headwind, with an ROIC of 5.5% falling short of the estimated cost of equity at 7.5%, resulting in a negative spread that suggests value destruction relative to financing costs despite robust profitability metrics. This apparent contradiction is partially explained by high leverage inherent in DuPont decomposition; while net and gross margins are exceptionally strong at 16.7% and 72.1% respectively, the return on invested capital fails to materialize as a true economic profit generator. Fundamental stability appears resilient given a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a negative Beneish M-Score of -2.56 indicating low earnings manipulation risk, yet an Altman Z-Score of 1.6 signals elevated distress probability that warrants scrutiny regarding the sustainability of such thin operating spreads against debt obligations.

Valuation multiples currently sit at 20.3x P/E, a premium that requires rigorous justification given the negative ROIC-WACC spread and moderate revenue growth trajectory of only 5.5% year-over-year. The divergence between current pricing and a calculated DCF fair value of $96 implies the market is either discounting future cash flow volatility associated with the low Z-Score or anticipating an acceleration in organic top-line expansion beyond historical norms. Without evidence that leverage will compress to improve ROIC, the multiple appears stretched relative to the underlying capital efficiency, creating a scenario where price appreciation must be driven almost entirely by growth rather than margin expansion or asset turnover improvements.

Risk assessment reveals a dichotomy between operational integrity and solvency constraints; while the low Beneish score supports confidence in reported earnings quality, the Altman Z-Score of 1.6 introduces substantial downside risk that could rapidly erode equity value if liquidity pressures mount. The negative return on capital further complicates the risk/reward profile, as any adverse shock to margins or turnover would likely exacerbate financial distress rather than cushion it through internal cash generation. Investors must weigh the high-margin business model against the precarious balance sheet implied by the Z-Score and sub-par ROIC before forming a view on future performance potential.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →6%7.5%9.5%
2%$112$81$58
3%$145$96$65
4%$211$120$75

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=7.5%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $96 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
1.6
Altman Z-Score
Distress Zone — below 1.8 threshold per academic model. Thresholds: >3 safe, 1.8–3 grey, <1.8 distress.
-2.56
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

72.1%
Gross Margin
16.7%
Net Margin
5.5%
ROIC
7.5%
WACC
ROIC − WACC Spread: -2.0%— Negative spread.
+5.5%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+40.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
7.2B
Free Cash Flow
66%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

0.77x
Debt / Equity
1.09x
Current Ratio
10.9x
Interest Coverage
0.5x
Net Debt / EBITDA
6.86%
FCF Yield
12.5B
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✓ Beat
Est: $1.67
Act: $1.79
+7.1%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $1.64
Act: $1.59
-2.9%
Q2
✓ Beat
Est: $2.70
Act: $2.91
+7.9%
Q1
✓ Beat
Est: $1.47
Act: $1.53
+4.4%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

9.1
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
1.39
Price/Book
2M
Avg Volume
$103.64
52W High
$74.85
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$1.4B
Tracked Passive Exposure
6
ETFs Holding FR0000120578
0.37%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$385B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like EFA or IEFA, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FR0000120578 shares regardless of FR0000120578's individual fundamentals. We estimate $1.4B of passive capital is structurally linked to FR0000120578 through 6 tracked ETFs. Index rebalances and ETF creation/redemption cycles can create noticeable volume spikes unrelated to company news.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 6 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in FR0000120578 to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

FR0000120578 Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
FR0000120578EpicenterIEFAETFEFAETFSCHFETFNL0010273215Low RiskCH0012032048Low RiskNVDALow RiskCH0012005267Low RiskAAPLLow Risk
FR0000120578 Price Drop (%)0

If FR0000120578 (FR0000120578) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding N.V. (NL0010273215) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 3 ETFs with FR0000120578. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 6 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

FR0000120578 Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
FR0000120578

Float lock-up computed from 6 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

FR0000120578 Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does FR0000120578 convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$7.2B
EBITDA
$12.5B
FCF Conversion
58%
Reinvestment Rate
42%
58% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)
ROIC
5.5%
ROIC − WACC Spread
-2.0%

FR0000120578 converts 58% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, a healthy conversion rate indicating efficient capital management — the business generates substantial cash after reinvestment. However, the ROIC-WACC spread is negative (-2.0%), suggesting reinvested capital is destroying shareholder value.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Compare FR0000120578 to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.