FRO (FRO)

$7.9B
Market Cap
20.9
P/E Ratio
0.06
Beta
4.96%
Dividend Yield
Piotroski 7/9Beneish M -2.65 Clean

Quantitative Summary

Deterministic

Strong operational fundamentals (Piotroski 7/9).

Generated deterministically from quant metrics and financial statements. Not a recommendation.

Algorithmic Teardown

AI-Generated

The company exhibits a distinct divergence between its capital efficiency and revenue trajectory, generating an ROIC of 9.3% while simultaneously contracting sales by 4.2% year-over-year. This contraction suggests that the current profitability is being driven disproportionately by leverage or margin expansion rather than volume growth, as evidenced by healthy gross margins of 32.8% and net margins of 19.3%. Fundamental quality indicators appear robust; a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 signals strong financial health with positive operating cash flow and improving profitability, while a Beneish M-Score of -2.65 effectively rules out earnings manipulation risks typically associated with aggressive accounting practices.

Valuation metrics present a mixed signal relative to historical norms and implied growth rates. Trading at a current P/E multiple of 20.9x, the stock commands a premium that likely assumes continued margin stability despite declining top-line activity. However, the DCF model calculates a fair value of $20, which may imply that the market is pricing in a recovery or that the current valuation does not fully account for the revenue headwinds. The gap between the explicit multiple and the discounted cash flow output requires scrutiny regarding whether the 19.3% net margin can be sustained without top-line expansion to justify the price-to-earnings ratio against sector peers.

The risk profile is characterized by a significant delta in growth momentum versus capital returns, creating an asymmetric setup where high profitability masks underlying revenue erosion. The combination of shrinking revenues and static ROIC suggests that future earnings visibility may depend heavily on operational efficiency gains or cost-cutting measures rather than market share expansion. Investors must weigh the strength of the balance sheet indicators against the potential downside risk inherent in a business model that is profitable but failing to scale its top line, leaving uncertainty regarding whether current valuations adequately price this structural challenge.

Generated by LLM from quantitative data inputs. May contain inaccuracies. Not investment advice.

DCF Sandbox

Interactive

Sensitivity Matrix

TG ↓ / WACC →8%10%12%
2%$26$17$12
3%$32$20$13
4%$40$24$15

Center = base case. Green = >10% upside, Red = >10% downside vs .

Pre-computed DCF: WACC=10.0%, terminal growth 3%. Fair value $20 (+0.0%). Not investment advice.

Price Chart with Moving Averages

Loading chart...
SMA 50 SMA 200

Quant Health Deep Dive

7/9
Piotroski F-Score
Strong — high operational efficiency and profitability signals
-2.65
Beneish M-Score
Below threshold — no statistical earnings quality concern per Beneish model. Threshold: <-2.22 = below threshold.

Profitability & Value Creation

32.8%
Gross Margin
19.3%
Net Margin
9.3%
ROIC
-4.2%
Revenue Growth (YoY)
-23.5%
Earnings Growth (YoY)
669.9M
Free Cash Flow
31%
FCF Payout Ratio

✅ Conservative payout — room for dividend increases.

Balance Sheet Health

1.29x
Debt / Equity
1.43x
Current Ratio
2.7x
Interest Coverage
2.6x
Net Debt / EBITDA
944.6M
EBITDA

Earnings Surprise History

Q4
✗ Miss
Est: $0.22
Act: $0.18
-19.7%
Q3
✗ Miss
Est: $0.55
Act: $0.36
-34.1%
Q2
✗ Miss
Est: $0.24
Act: $0.19
-20.3%
Q1
✗ Miss
Est: $1.13
Act: $1.03
-8.6%

EPS estimates vs actuals for the most recent reported quarters. Source: yfinance.

Underwater (Drawdown from Peak)

How far below the all-time high the price has been over time. Deeper = more pain for holders.

Loading drawdown chart...

Rolling 60-Day Beta vs S&P 500 (VOO)

How the stock's sensitivity to market moves changes over time. β > 1 = more volatile than the market.

Loading beta chart...
Rolling Beta Market (β = 1.0)

Fundamentals

15.1
Forward P/E
PEG Ratio
3.15
Price/Book
4M
Avg Volume
$39.89
52W High
$14.81
52W Low
52W Range Position

Passive Flow Attribution

ETF Draft Effect
$34M
Tracked Passive Exposure
3
ETFs Holding FRO
0.04%
Avg Weight in ETFs
$86B
Total ETF AUM

When investors buy or sell ETFs like VSS or VGK, the fund manager is mechanically forced to buy or sell FRO shares regardless of FRO's individual fundamentals. We estimate $34M of passive capital is structurally linked to FRO through 3 tracked ETFs. Passive flows have a limited but growing influence on FRO's daily trading dynamics.

Passive exposure = Σ (ETF AUM × stock weight in ETF) across 3 tracked ETFs. Actual passive ownership is larger (includes mutual funds). Not investment advice.

ETF Contagion Visualizer

Simulate a price drop in FRO to visualize passive redemption contagion across ETFs and collateral stocks.

FRO Shock
-0%
Est. Passive Redemption
$0
Systemic Risk
STABLE
FROEpicenterVGKETFSPDWETFVSSETFASMLLow RiskSMSNUnknownA000660UnknownHSBAUnknownASMLLow Risk
FRO Price Drop (%)0

If FRO (FRO) experiences a significant drawdown, ETF redemptions can create collateral selling pressure on co-held stocks. Our model identifies ASML Holding NV (ASML) as the most exposed collateral stock, sharing 1 ETFs with FRO. This is the "Passive Contagion" effect described in the Inelastic Market Hypothesis.

Contagion model based on shared ETF exposure and constituent weights across 3 tracked ETFs. Estimated selling pressure is a simplified model — actual impact depends on market liquidity, ETF redemption mechanics, and market-maker activity.

FRO Ownership Dynamics

Ticker
FRO

ETFs with Highest FRO Exposure

Float lock-up computed from 3 ETFs tracked by SecuritiesDB. Actual passive ownership is higher (includes mutual funds, pension funds, etc.).

FRO Capital Efficiency

How efficiently does FRO convert operating profits into free cash? The FCF Conversion ratio measures the gap between accounting earnings and real cash generation.

Free Cash Flow
$670M
EBITDA
$945M
FCF Conversion
71%
Reinvestment Rate
29%
71% of EBITDA → Free Cash
0% (cash burn)25% (low)50% (efficient)100% (pure cash)

FRO converts 71% of its EBITDA into free cash flow, an exceptional conversion rate indicating an asset-light business model with minimal capital reinvestment drag.

Capital efficiency = Free Cash Flow ÷ EBITDA. Reinvestment = (EBITDA − FCF) ÷ EBITDA. Metrics from latest annual filings. Not investment advice.

Fails-to-Deliver (FTD) History

SEC-reported settlement failures. Elevated FTDs can indicate high short-selling pressure, operational settlement issues, or naked shorting activity.

DateFailed SharesClose PriceNotional Value
2026-05-1479,309$37.19$2.9M
2026-05-1316,066$38.53$619,022.98
2026-05-1212,659$38.15$482,940.85
2026-05-11210$39.51$8,297.1
2026-05-083,573$38.12$136,202.76
2026-05-071,469$37.70$55,381.3
2026-04-273,271$35.59$116,414.89
2026-04-234$34.66$138.64
2026-04-20600$37.13$22,278
2026-04-1761$35.15$2,144.15
2026-04-0930,375$36.15$1.1M
2026-04-0824,369$34.98$852,427.62
2026-04-06241,952$36.60$8.9M
2026-04-014,301$34.86$149,932.86
2026-03-261$33.75$33.75
2026-03-256$35.44$212.64
2026-03-202,694$32.88$88,578.72
2026-03-121,082$33.50$36,247
2026-03-0913,000$34.56$449,280
2026-03-0612,738$34.92$444,810.96
2026-03-052,900$36.28$105,212
2026-03-0345$39.62$1,782.9
2026-02-274,236$37.28$157,918.08
2026-02-2410,642$35.09$373,427.78
2026-02-23194,370$34.72$6.7M
2026-02-20306,019$33.82$10.3M
2026-02-19300,061$33.28$10.0M
2026-02-1140,759$29.05$1.2M
2026-02-1039,073$29.10$1.1M
2026-02-0344,296$28.56$1.3M

Source: SEC Regulation SHO FTD data. Data is reported with a ~30 day delay. High FTD quantities relative to average daily volume may indicate settlement stress.

Compare FRO to Peers

Quant metrics computed deterministically from financial statements and price data. Updated: N/A.

SecuritiesDB provides programmatic data aggregation for informational purposes only. None of the metrics, summaries, or algorithmic flags constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any security.